arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Lucía S. Ramirez

Publications and source records attributed to Lucía S. Ramirez.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

How Rich is the Rich-Club? Super Rich-Club Organization in Complex Networks

The rich-club coefficient is used in complex networks to quantify the tendency of progressively higher-degree nodes to be more densely connected than expected by chance. However, it does not capture whether high degree nodes towards the core are actually more interconnected than the original network. Here, we jointly analyze the rich-club coefficient and an enrichment coefficient, which quantifies whether the internal average degree of progressively higher-degree subgraphs is greater than that of the original network, despite the decreasing number of nodes. We apply this framework to real and synthetic networks. Our results reveal three distinct regimes of core organization: rich-club organization without enrichment, enrichment without rich-club organization, and a combination of both, which we call Super Rich-Club organization. In the latter regime, high-degree nodes form cohesive and unusually dense cores that support efficient communication. Our results show that characterizing core organization across structural scales requires considering both relative density and internal connectivity, revealing a stronger form of core organization in real systems with implications for network structure, spectral properties that govern dynamical processes, and communicability.

physics.soc-ph↗

Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact

We study how zealotry and nonlinear social impact affect consensus formation in the nonlinear voter model, evolutionary games, and the partisan voter model. In all three models, consensus is an absorbing state in finite populations, while coexistence is a possible outcome of the deterministic dynamics. We show that sufficiently strong zealotry, i.e. the presence of agents who never change state, can drive infinite populations to consensus in all three models. However, while evolutionary games and the partisan voter model permit zealotry-induced consensus for all values of their model parameters, the nonlinear voter model does not. Central to this difference is the shape of the social impact function, which quantifies how the influence of a group scales with size, and is therefore a measure of majority and minority effects. We derive general conditions relating the slope of this function at small group sizes to the local stability of consensus. Sublinear impact favours minorities and can override zealotry to prevent consensus, whereas superlinear impact promotes majorities and therefore facilitates consensus. We extend the analysis to finite populations, exploring the time-to-consensus, and the shape of quasi-stationary distributions.

physics.soc-ph↗