arXiv subjects

Liudong Chen

Publications and source records attributed to Liudong Chen.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Fairness as an Investment: Dynamic Participation and Long-Run Profit in Virtual Power Plants

We show that incorporating fairness constraints into virtual power plant (VPP) operations can incentivize consumer participation and thus improve the aggregator's long-run profitability. VPPs rely on sustained participation from heterogeneous consumers to provide a variety of grid services whose timing and frequency are often uncertain. As a result, consumers' willingness and ability to provide flexibility evolve over time, creating a dynamic link between past participation and future resource availability. We develop a dynamic aggregation framework to study how fairness in service allocation affects future participation and long-run profitability. By linking current dispatch decisions to future resource availability, we show that fairer allocations can strengthen consumer engagement, expand aggregate availability, and create additional value during high-price and high-demand events. To balance fairness and operational efficiency, we introduce a slack-augmented allocation mechanism that preserves most of the participation benefits from fairness while avoiding unnecessary reductions in service procurement. We derive conditions under which the resulting availability gains outweigh the short-run cost of redistribution and validate the approach using real-world consumer behavior and electricity market data from Norway.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2026

Fair Aggregation in Virtual Power Plants

A virtual power plant (VPP) is operated by an aggregator that acts as a market intermediary, aggregating consumers to participate in wholesale power markets. By setting incentive prices, the aggregator induces consumers to sell energy and profits by providing this aggregated energy to the market. This supply is enabled by consumers' flexibility to adjust electricity consumption in response to market conditions. However, heterogeneity in flexibility means that profit-maximizing VPP pricing can create inequalities in participation and benefit allocation across consumers. In this paper, we develop a fairness-aware pricing framework to analyze how different fairness notions reshape system performance, measured by consumer Nash welfare, total consumer utility, and social welfare. We consider three fairness criteria: energy fairness, which ensures equitable energy provision; price fairness, which ensures similar incentive prices; and utility fairness, which ensures comparable levels of consumer utility. We model the aggregator-consumer interaction as a Stackelberg game and derive consumers' optimal responses to incentive prices. Using a stylized model, we show that profit-only pricing systematically disadvantages less flexible consumers. We further show that energy fairness can either improve or worsen all performance measures, and gains across most measures arise only at moderate fairness levels. Surprisingly, price fairness never benefits less flexible consumers, even when it reduces price disparities. By contrast, utility fairness protects less flexible consumers without benefiting more flexible ones. We validate our findings using data from an experiment in Norway under a tiered pricing scheme. Our results provide regulators and VPP operators with a systematic map linking fairness definitions and enforcement levels to operational and welfare outcomes.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Gaming on Coincident Peak Shaving: Equilibrium and Strategic Behavior

Power system operators and electric utility companies often impose a coincident peak demand charge on customers when the aggregate system demand reaches its maximum. This charge incentivizes customers to strategically shift their peak usage away from the system's collective peak, which helps reduce stress on electricity infrastructure. In this paper, we develop a game-theoretic model to analyze how such strategic behavior affects overall system efficiency. We show that depending on the extent of customers' demand-shifting capabilities, the resulting coincident peak shaving game can exhibit concavity, quasi-concavity with discontinuities, or non-concavity with discontinuities. In a two-agent, two-period setting, we derive closed-form Nash equilibrium solutions for each scenario and generalize our findings to multi-agent contexts. We prove the stability of the equilibrium points and propose an algorithm for computing equilibrium outcomes under all game configurations. Our results indicate that the peak-shaving outcome at the equilibrium of the game model is comparable to the optimal outcome of the natural centralized model. However, there is a significant loss in efficiency. Under quasi-concave and non-concave conditions, this inefficiency grows with increased customer flexibility and larger disparities in marginal shifting costs; we also examine how the number of agents influences system performance. Finally, numerical simulations with real-world applications validate our theoretical insights.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2024

A Prudent Framework for Understanding Risk-Awareness in Demand Response

We show that risk-aware behaviors in demand response originate from superquadratic state-dependent cost functions and price uncertainty with skewed distributions. We obtain such results through developing a novel theoretical demand response framework that combines non-anticipatory multi-stage decision-making with superquadratic cost functions. We introduce the concept of prudent demand, defined by a positive third-order derivative of the cost function, which is the first principle for risk-averse behavior despite a risk-neutral objective. Our analysis establishes that future price uncertainty affects immediate consumption decisions, and the extent of this response scales proportionally with the skewness of the price distribution. We visualize our theoretical findings through numerical simulations and illustrate their practical implications using a real-world case study.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2023

Equitable Time-Varying Pricing Tariff Design: A Joint Learning and Optimization Approach

Time-varying pricing tariffs incentivize consumers to shift their electricity demand and reduce costs, but may increase the energy burden for consumers with limited response capability. The utility must thus balance affordability and response incentives when designing these tariffs by considering consumers' response expectations. This paper proposes a joint learning-based identification and optimization method to design equitable time-varying tariffs. Our proposed method encodes historical prices and demand response data into a recurrent neural network (RNN) to capture high-dimensional and non-linear consumer price response behaviors. We then embed the RNN into the tariff design optimization, formulating a non-linear optimization problem with a quadratic objective. We propose a gradient-based solution method that achieves fast and scalable computation. Simulation using real-world consumer data shows that our equitable tariffs protect low-income consumers from price surges while effectively motivating consumers to reduce peak demand. The method also ensures revenue recovery for the utility company and achieves robust performance against demand response uncertainties and prediction errors.

cs.LG↗