arXiv subjects

Lisha Qu

Publications and source records attributed to Lisha Qu.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Quantile Propagation Planning for Budgeted Tail-Risk Evaluation

Risk-aware planning must identify rare, costly outcomes using only a limited number of model evaluations. Monte Carlo rollouts spend this budget on noisy tail estimates, while planning from the mean can miss the tail entirely. We introduce quantile propagation planning (QPP), which propagates a small, fixed set of disturbance quantiles through the dynamics and integrates the resulting cost curve to evaluate both mean and tail risk. The method is exact at the propagated levels, converges as the quantile grid is refined, and admits a one-sided conservatism guarantee under stated structural conditions. In controlled overload and inventory tasks, QPP reduces realized tail cost and constraint violations relative to mean-rollout planning. On overload, it remains competitive with sampled evaluators that use substantially more trajectories. These results position QPP as a transparent, budget-controlled approach to tail-risk evaluation.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Sparse Autoencoders as Implicit Diversification Regularisers for Cross-Sectional Cryptocurrency Returns

Factor models are central to asset pricing and portfolio construction, but neural factors are often difficult to interpret, and their effect on portfolio risk is unclear. A sparse autoencoder (SAE) may address both concerns by describing daily returns across many assets with only a few active features. We ask whether this sparse representation produces stable financial factors and better-diversified portfolios. We study cryptocurrency returns, use equities as a secondary test, and compare the SAE with common benchmarks in a time-ordered evaluation. We find consistently lower volatility in SAE portfolios and link this result to lower correlations among the selected assets. However, the SAE does not outperform a simple contrarian strategy on risk-adjusted return, and its factor identities are not stable across training runs. Our contribution is to show that sparse coding can support portfolio diversification, while clearly separating this risk effect from claims about alpha or stable factor identities.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Checkpoint Reload Explains Most of the Measured State Gap in Two State Discovery Reproductions

Temporal models that maintain per-sequence latent states during training must reconstruct those states when the stored table is unavailable at inference. This creates a basic consistency question: do the reconstructed states agree with those formed during training? We study this question for State Discovery in World Machine, which updates stored states in parallel each epoch but performs inference by sequential rollout from an all-zero start. On Toy1D, we analyze two paired-checkpoint runs whose decoded-state MSE is 27 to 36 percent above the published value. We compare the stored table with rollouts under the best-validation checkpoint reloaded after training and the last-epoch weights that wrote the table. Matching the rollout to the table-writing weights removes 90 to 91 percent of the mean per-dimension Wasserstein-1 distance. Causal distillation and frozen SD updates do not satisfy their pre-specified criteria under either checkpoint. Overall, checkpoint reload accounts for most of the measured gap in these runs.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

The Label Complexity of Useful Class-Conditional Prediction Sets under Distribution Shift

Prediction sets can make deployed classifiers safer by returning several plausible labels when a single prediction is uncertain. Their value depends on classwise reliability: average coverage can meet its target while rare or difficult classes fail repeatedly. This concern is sharper after distribution shift, when calibration labels come from a source environment but reliability is needed on the target. We ask what labeled source data and unlabeled target inputs reveal about class-conditional prediction sets, and when target labels are necessary. Under unrestricted joint shift, two target laws can produce the same observable data while requiring different classwise thresholds; any label-free rule covering both must enlarge its sets on one law. We give a labeled target audit that estimates the missing quantiles with a simultaneous guarantee. Probability-scale error is invariant to increasing score transformations, and threshold recovery follows under local regularity. At fixed confidence, achieving threshold tolerance $\varepsilon$ with fixed, nonadaptive class-stratified labeled pairs has total complexity $Θ(K\varepsilon^{-2}\log K)$, or $Θ(\varepsilon^{-2}\log K)$ labels per class under equal allocation. Class imbalance creates a separate acquisition cost; for foreground class probabilities of order $1/K$, the mixed-stream label complexity is also $Θ(K\varepsilon^{-2}\log K)$ at fixed confidence. Experiments on action-recognition and image shifts show that marginal coverage can conceal severe class failures and that source classwise calibration depends on the shift. The results connect the information available at deployment to the target labels needed for useful class-conditional prediction.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

The Premise Is the Problem: Exchangeability Failure in Self-Monitored Test-Time Adaptation

Modern forecasting models are often updated after deployment so they can respond to changing data. These updates can also make predictions worse, so practical systems need a reliable monitor that can detect harmful changes and trigger protection. A natural design is to monitor the same prediction errors that guide the updates. This paper asks whether the statistical guarantee behind such a monitor remains valid when monitoring and adaptation use the same feedback. We study this question in multi-step time-series forecasting. We show that overlapping targets and dependence in forecast errors can break a key assumption required by the guarantee. The monitor may then raise alarms even when no harmful change has occurred, and its response can further damage prediction quality. We also find that adaptation can hide sustained changes from its own monitor, while the original frozen model retains a clearer signal. These results expose a basic failure mode in self-monitored adaptation. They show why reliable deployment requires checking the monitor's assumptions, comparing adaptation with the frozen model under realistic feedback, and limiting the effect of every protective response.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

When the Martingale Never Stops Firing: Anytime-Valid Gating on Real Forecast Streams

Machine learning systems are increasingly corrected while they run, and the decision of when to intervene is increasingly delegated to statistical monitors. Anytime-valid inference promises evidence that can be acted on at any moment, exactly the guarantee this setting needs, and it is moving from theory into deployed monitoring. Conformal test martingales are the change-detection instrument, and Ville's inequality caps their false-alarm probability on exchangeable data. The guarantee is conditional. A deployment inherits it only if the stream it monitors behaves exchangeably. The premise is hardest to satisfy where these monitors are most useful, on dependent data and inside loops where the monitor modifies the learner whose scores it reads. It is also rarely measured. We measure it in a pre-specified case study, where such a monitor gates the online updates of a Kalman adapter correcting frozen time-series foundation models on five forecasting streams. On exchangeable synthetic streams, the same implementation fires in at most 1 of 60 runs. On the real streams, at alpha = 0.05, 135 of 135 clean-stream runs fired. The construction does not explain the firing; the failure comes from the deployed score stream itself. Repeated fires hold the gate's drift response active, and the gated filter amplifies the very transient it was designed to prevent. The component worth keeping makes no validity claim. Huber-style gating of the filter's own updates cuts isolated-spike degradation by an order of magnitude with no dataset specific tuning. Anytime-valid methods proposed for dependent data should therefore be accompanied by null-calibration controls and mechanism traces.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Decomposing Runtime, Kernel, and Quantization Speedups via a Matched FP16 Intermediate: A Hardware-Conditioned Case Study on Four NVIDIA RTX A5000 GPUs

Reported serving speedups from quantized kernels typically bundle the weight format, the kernel, and the inference runtime into one number. We present an attribution study on four NVIDIA RTX A5000 GPUs, 24 GiB each, on a single host with NVLink-bridged pairs. A matched intermediate stack that keeps the faster runtime without the quantized kernel splits the full speedup into a runtime part and a kernel and quantization part. Under matched greedy decoding the full stack reaches $2.58\times$ end to end, with the runtime change accounting for about two thirds of that gain on a logarithmic scale; across three similar model families the kernel and quantization part moves by at most 1.5%. Sharding one instance across all four cards falls well below doubling: a profiler trace attributes about 80% of the per token shortfall to coordination, and an NVLink versus PCIe control on the same hardware shows similar realized bandwidth on both links, pointing away from link bandwidth as the cause. Whether to run one sharded instance or several independent ones depends on the workload and the model, with the ranking reversing on the larger model: the smaller model splits between sharding and multiple instances by workload, while the larger model favors two paired instances on every workload. Quantization extends sustainable concurrent users roughly four times past a reproducible half precision memory cliff. Differences in sampling mode and prompt pool between the two stacks are documented as threats to validity.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Fed-MUnet: Multi-modal Federated Unet for Brain Tumor Segmentation

Deep learning-based techniques have been widely utilized for brain tumor segmentation using both single and multi-modal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) images. Most current studies focus on centralized training due to the intrinsic challenge of data sharing across clinics. To mitigate privacy concerns, researchers have introduced Federated Learning (FL) methods to brain tumor segmentation tasks. However, currently such methods are focusing on single modal MRI, with limited study on multi-modal MRI. The challenges include complex structure, large-scale parameters, and overfitting issues of the FL based methods using multi-modal MRI. To address the above challenges, we propose a novel multi-modal FL framework for brain tumor segmentation (Fed-MUnet) that is suitable for FL training. We evaluate our approach with the BraTS2022 datasets, which are publicly available. The experimental results demonstrate that our framework achieves FL nature of distributed learning and privacy preserving. For the enhancing tumor, tumor core and whole tumor, the mean of five major metrics were 87.5%, 90.6% and 92.2%, respectively, which were higher than SOTA methods while preserving privacy. In terms of parameters count, quantity of floating-point operations (FLOPs) and inference, Fed-MUnet is Pareto optimal compared with the state-of-the-art segmentation backbone while achieves higher performance and tackles privacy issue. Our codes are open-sourced at https://github.com/Arnold-Jun/Fed-MUnet.

cs.CV↗