arXiv subjects

Lisa Ehrlinger

Publications and source records attributed to Lisa Ehrlinger.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

WiDiff: Extracting Changes from Wikidata's Edit History

Knowledge graphs have become a key resource for integrating heterogeneous data and powering downstream tasks such as question answering, entity linking, and semantic search. They are built and maintained incrementally, either (i) fully automated, e.g., YAGO, (ii) semiautomatically with community oversight, e.g., DBpedia, or (iii) manually through collaborative editing, e.g., Wikidata. Understanding the evolution of knowledge graphs is essential as changes may reflect real-world updates, error corrections, or noise introduced by vandalism, all of which affect the reliability of downstream applications. Among openly available knowledge graphs, Wikidata is the most challenging case to study evolution, with over 120 million entities edited by humans and bots and an edit history spanning more than a decade. Although Wikidata exposes change data in various formats (e.g., periodic dumps and real-time event streams), none support analytical queries over the complete edit history. Therefore, we present WiDiff, a tool that extracts changes from Wikidata's complete edit history and provides a unified interface for large-scale analytical queries over it.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2026

Data Quality Rule Generation with LLMs

The validation of data, such as customer and employee data, is an important task in many organizations. Errors in data can have severe consequences. For example, a wrong drug unit in a patient record can lead to life-threatening medication errors, and a missing street number in an address to failed deliveries. Companies often employ rule-based enterprise data quality (DQ) tools, which allow domain experts to specify rules to validate the data over time. While rule-based DQ tools are computationally efficient and provide explainable reports, maintaining a comprehensive rule set manually is challenging, as domain experts often overlook essential rules, especially in complex domains and large data volumes. Hence, closing these gaps remains an open problem in practice. In this paper, we address the challenge of automated DQ rule generation. For this, we formalize a generalizable generate-filter framework and introduce LeDQeR, an LLM-based DQ rule generation approach. First, a large language model (LLM) generates candidates rules from an observed dirty data tuple for a given rule-based DQ tool syntax. Second, we apply four filter techniques that ensure the (i) executability, (ii) correctness, and (iii) generalizability, and avoid (iv) redundancy of the generated rules. An extensive experimental evaluation suggests that LeDQeR is able to produce effective and compact rule sets for various datasets and error types.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Evaluating Data Quality Tools: Measurement Capabilities and LLM Integration

High data quality is critical for reliable analytics and operational efficiency. A growing ecosystem of tools has emerged to support data quality management, ranging from lightweight open-source libraries to comprehensive enterprise platforms. This paper evaluates six data quality tools: Great Expectations, Deequ, Evidently, Informatica, Experian, and Ataccama. The evaluation criteria cover rule definition, duplicate detection, metric aggregation, and uncertainty handling, and were derived from real-world use cases of company partners. We further examine to what extent these tools integrate Large Language Models (LLMs). Our findings show that proprietary tools offer more comprehensive measurement features and emerging LLM-based assistance, while open-source tools provide flexibility at the cost of higher implementation effort. Across all tools, LLM integration remains limited to rule creation workflows. Direct data validation through LLMs is not yet supported by any of the evaluated tools.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2026

A Catalog of Data Errors

Data errors are widespread in real-world databases and severely impact downstream applications, such as machine learning pipelines or business analytics reports. Causes of such errors are manifold and can arise during both the design phase and the operational phase of a database. Some error types, such as missing values, duplicate tuples, or constraint violations, are widely recognized; others, such as disguised missing values or word transpositions, remain underexplored. Existing attempts to define and classify errors in data offer valuable but limited taxonomies, mostly informal and not covering the full range of error types. With the rise of AI, practitioners must increasingly detect and correct statistical errors such as bias and outliers, which are rarely considered within existing error taxonomies. This catalog presents a comprehensive list of 35 distinct error types, including both data errors (e.g., missing values, duplicate tuples) and error indicators (e.g., outliers, bias) for tabular data, classified into three non-overlapping categories: missing, incorrect, and redundant. For each error type, we provide a formal definition and practical example, and resolve terminological inconsistencies across related work. Our catalog enables researchers and practitioners to address various error types and systematically implement error-specific detection and cleaning strategies in data quality tools.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2025

Is SHACL Suitable for Data Quality Assessment?

Knowledge graphs have been widely adopted in both enterprises, such as the Google Knowledge Graph, and open platforms like Wikidata, to represent domain knowledge and support artificial intelligence applications. They model real-world information as nodes and edges. To embrace flexibility, knowledge graphs often lack enforced schemas (i.e., ontologies), leading to potential data quality issues, such as semantically overlapping nodes. Yet ensuring their quality is essential, as issues in the data can affect applications relying on them. To assess the quality of knowledge graphs, existing works propose either high-level frameworks comprising various data quality dimensions without concrete implementations, define tools that measure data quality with ad-hoc SPARQL queries, or promote the usage of constraint languages, such as the Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL), to assess and improve the quality of the graph. Although the latter approaches claim to address data quality assessment, none of them comprehensively tries to cover all data quality dimensions. In this paper, we explore this gap by investigating the extent to which SHACL can be used to assess data quality in knowledge graphs. Specifically, we defined SHACL shapes for 69 data quality metrics proposed by Zaveri et al. [1] and implemented a prototype that automatically instantiates these shapes and computes the corresponding data quality measures from their validation results. All resources are provided for repeatability.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2025

Unfolding Data Quality Dimensions in Practice: A Survey

Data quality describes the degree to which data meet specific requirements and are fit for use by humans and/or downstream tasks (e.g., artificial intelligence). Data quality can be assessed across multiple high-level concepts called dimensions, such as accuracy, completeness, consistency, or timeliness. While extensive research and several attempts for standardization (e.g., ISO/IEC 25012) exist for data quality dimensions, their practical application often remains unclear. In parallel to research endeavors, a large number of tools have been developed that implement functionalities for the detection and mitigation of specific data quality issues, such as missing values or outliers. With this paper, we aim to bridge this gap between data quality theory and practice by systematically connecting low-level functionalities offered by data quality tools with high-level dimensions, revealing their many-to-many relationships. Through an examination of seven open-source data quality tools, we provide a comprehensive mapping between their functionalities and the data quality dimensions, demonstrating how individual functionalities and their variants partially contribute to the assessment of single dimensions. This systematic survey provides both practitioners and researchers with a unified view on the fragmented landscape of data quality checks, offering actionable insights for quality assessment across multiple dimensions.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2024

Data Quality Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities

Data-oriented applications, their users, and even the law require data of high quality. Research has divided the rather vague notion of data quality into various dimensions, such as accuracy, consistency, and reputation. To achieve the goal of high data quality, many tools and techniques exist to clean and otherwise improve data. Yet, systematic research on actually assessing data quality in its dimensions is largely absent, and with it, the ability to gauge the success of any data cleaning effort. We propose five facets as ingredients to assess data quality: data, source, system, task, and human. Tapping each facet for data quality assessment poses its own challenges. We show how overcoming these challenges helps data quality assessment for those data quality dimensions mentioned in Europe's AI Act. Our work concludes with a proposal for a comprehensive data quality assessment framework.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2020

Knowledge Graphs in Manufacturing and Production: A Systematic Literature Review

Knowledge graphs in manufacturing and production aim to make production lines more efficient and flexible with higher quality output. This makes knowledge graphs attractive for companies to reach Industry 4.0 goals. However, existing research in the field is quite preliminary, and more research effort on analyzing how knowledge graphs can be applied in the field of manufacturing and production is needed. Therefore, we have conducted a systematic literature review as an attempt to characterize the state-of-the-art in this field, i.e., by identifying exiting research and by identifying gaps and opportunities for further research. To do that, we have focused on finding the primary studies in the existing literature, which were classified and analyzed according to four criteria: bibliometric key facts, research type facets, knowledge graph characteristics, and application scenarios. Besides, an evaluation of the primary studies has also been carried out to gain deeper insights in terms of methodology, empirical evidence, and relevance. As a result, we can offer a complete picture of the domain, which includes such interesting aspects as the fact that knowledge fusion is currently the main use case for knowledge graphs, that empirical research and industrial application are still missing to a large extent, that graph embeddings are not fully exploited, and that technical literature is fast-growing but seems to be still far from its peak.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2019

A Survey of Data Quality Measurement and Monitoring Tools

High-quality data is key to interpretable and trustworthy data analytics and the basis for meaningful data-driven decisions. In practical scenarios, data quality is typically associated with data preprocessing, profiling, and cleansing for subsequent tasks like data integration or data analytics. However, from a scientific perspective, a lot of research has been published about the measurement (i.e., the detection) of data quality issues and different generally applicable data quality dimensions and metrics have been discussed. In this work, we close the gap between research into data quality measurement and practical implementations by investigating the functional scope of current data quality tools. With a systematic search, we identified 667 software tools dedicated to "data quality", from which we evaluated 13 tools with respect to three functionality areas: (1) data profiling, (2) data quality measurement in terms of metrics, and (3) continuous data quality monitoring. We selected the evaluated tools with regard to pre-defined exclusion criteria to ensure that they are domain-independent, provide the investigated functions, and are evaluable freely or as trial. This survey aims at a comprehensive overview on state-of-the-art data quality tools and reveals potential for their functional enhancement. Additionally, the results allow a critical discussion on concepts, which are widely accepted in research, but hardly implemented in any tool observed, for example, generally applicable data quality metrics.

cs.DB↗