arXiv subjects

Linzhe Zhang

Publications and source records attributed to Linzhe Zhang.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

What Can a Recurrent State Safely Forget?

Recurrent models must preserve information that changes future behavior while suppressing hidden-state error. These objectives conflict: contraction improves stability, but contraction along a future-distinguishing direction destroys memory. We formalize this boundary through the predictive quotient of a recurrent state space. Two hidden states are equivalent when they induce the same conditional future; their equivalence classes form predictive fibers. Every exact semantics-preserving corrector acts as the identity on this quotient. At a regular point with hidden dimension d and predictive dimension k, it can eliminate at most d - k independent directions. This establishes a discrete-continuous boundary: finite predictive states admit positive-radius exact correction basins, whereas an uncountable continuum of future-distinguishable states cannot be decoded after arbitrary positive-radius perturbations in finite-dimensional Euclidean space. To operationalize this principle, we develop an auditable finite-future framework. A compact deployment bank W is evaluated against an independent audit bank A (W subseteq A) on a declared correction domain. Under generative probe access and audit-metric coverage, finite stochastic rollouts furnish a high-probability certificate for the separation margin Omega_{W|A}(delta). Preserving learned W-predictions within this certified margin guarantees bounded audit-semantic distortion. For intrinsic audit dimension k, the required probe outcomes scale as O(M * Omega^{-(k+2)}), where M = |A|; a matching minimax lower bound proves this exponent is optimal. Extending guarantees to continuous futures is achieved via an explicit completeness modulus. Controlled experiments validate the certified margins, scaling laws, and automated probe refinement under a safety-first evaluation paradigm.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Discovering Physical Representation Languages

Before a machine can discover a physical law, it must discover what its measurements are: which observations live on cells, which are intensive or extensive, which sectors are dual, and which distinctions are merely gauge. We introduce physical representation-language discovery, the problem of recovering this hidden ontology directly from anonymous controlled experiments. We give an identifiability theory and constructive polynomial-time procedure that recovers a carrier and differential sequence, measurement types and orientation twist, noninvertible refinement semantics, primal-dual Maxwell diagrams, and the residual equivalences that no permitted experiment can break. The theory turns material nuisance into a commutant, uses refinement to separate quantities from coordinates, and selects physics only after its representation has been recovered. For a certified finite experiment family, we prove an end-to-end two-stage measurement bound and a matching minimax rate in dimension, accuracy, and confidence. Blind Maxwell experiments recover complete primal/relative-dual ontologies on regular and unstructured carriers under jointly corrupted observations; an independent unstructured RLC system demonstrates that the result is not specific to Maxwell. The framework scales to tens of thousands of cells per carrier, while stress audits demonstrate robustness across severe physical regimes - including non-Markovian memory, nonlinearities, nonlocality, and complex constitutive hysteresis. A public FDTD audit demonstrates the emergence of anonymous curl structure from incomplete field data, while characterizing the informational prerequisites for complete recovery. The goal is to move scientific ML from learning laws in a human-supplied language to discovering the language in which laws become expressible, establishing exact theoretical limits on observational identifiability.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Blind Thermodynamic Ontology Discovery from Anonymous Experiments

Before a machine learning model can learn a thermodynamic equation of state, it must discover what its measurements represent: which channels scale with system size, which are intensive conjugates, how sectors pair through contact, and which potential governs stability. When sensors expose only an unknown linear mixture of extensive states and intensive responses, passive observations cannot disentangle physical quantities from coordinate artifacts. We formulate the problem of discovering this hidden thermodynamic ontology directly from anonymous controlled experiments. We present an operational identifiability theory and a constructive polynomial-time algorithm that extracts extensive and intensive scaling sectors from replication contrasts, recovers their dual cotangent pairing from thermal contact and reciprocity, verifies a globally admissible concave potential via discrete cyclic concavity, and determines an invariant matroid of reservoir ensembles. We prove that the residual observational equivalence is strictly (x, lambda) ~ (A x, a A^{-T} lambda + beta), establishing the sharp observational limit that no permitted experiment can break. Blind evaluations on van der Waals fluids and Curie-Weiss magnets confirm robust recovery under ill-conditioned mixing, correctly resolving anonymous Maxwell tie-lines while rejecting non-equilibrium continuations. External validation across six real fluids from the NIST WebBook demonstrates that operational ontology discovery transfers across real physical substances without coordinate leakage.

cs.LG↗