arXiv subjects

Linyao Zheng

Publications and source records attributed to Linyao Zheng.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Weaver: Weaving Preference Evidence through Incremental Reasoning for Personalized Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Personalized retrieval-augmented generation requires extracting and applying user preferences from extended interaction histories. This task is challenging because preference evidence is scattered across past conversations and remains bound to specific temporal and situational contexts. Consequently, isolated fragments rarely provide complete support for a response, while preferences expressed under different conditions are easily conflated. To address these limitations, we propose Weaver, a framework that incrementally weaves memory-conditioned retrieval trajectories with compositional preference reasoning for personalized responses. Weaver operates on a Dual-Layer Retrieval and Reasoning Graph that couples an upper Intent Dependency Graph with a lower Memory-Conditioned Retrieval Trajectory Graph. Dependency Information Gap Tracking represents the information needed to answer the current request and its prerequisite dependencies in the upper graph. Memory-Conditioned Incremental Retrieval uses established premises and clues from retrieved conversations to locate missing evidence, recording the resulting retrieval trajectories in the lower graph. Scope-Aware Compositional Reasoning jointly interprets the accumulated evidence to determine which preferences apply to the request. It identifies complementary and alternative support and distinguishes conflicting claims within the same temporal and situational context. These conclusions iteratively update task premises and remaining information gaps, guiding subsequent retrieval to establish a coherent contextual basis for the final response. Experiments on personalized RAG benchmarks, particularly PersonaMem, demonstrate that Weaver outperforms leading baselines in both evidence completeness and answer quality.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

RCER: Reconstructing Cross-Evidence Relations for Iterative Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Iterative retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) accumulates knowledge from retrieved evidence to answer complex questions, but existing methods struggle to reconstruct entity correspondences and inferential dependencies across retrieved passages as new information emerges. We propose RCER, an iterative RAG method that reconstructs these cross-evidence relations directly from accumulated source passages. Inter-round relational evidence acquisition identifies entity correspondences and relational dependencies to drive dynamic problem decomposition and iterative retrieval. Reasoning context reconstruction independently constructs a coherent reasoning context through joint selection of complementary passages and derivation of cross-evidence inferences. Cross-evidence compositional reasoning leverages these inferences to establish entity correspondences and compose relations across selected passages for answer derivation. Experiments show that RCER outperforms the best baselines by 2.83 EM and 3.06 F1 points on average across three multi-hop QA benchmarks and achieves superior performance on narrative and implicit reasoning tasks.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

EvLink: Source-Grounded Evidence Linking for Graph RAG

Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) supports multi-hop reasoning by organizing corpora into structured graphs. However, graph reachability often captures semantic association rather than evidence support, so a reachable passage may still fail to justify a required cross-passage transition. We propose EvLink, an evidence-linking retriever that preserves passages as retrievable evidence units and builds evidence-supported transitions between them. EvLink constructs two types of reliable links: relation-grounded evidence links justified by explicit source relations, and endpoint-alignment links serving as sourcebounded fallbacks. For retrieval, we introduce a two-stage retrieval strategy. First, bounded breadth-first search over source-grounded evidence links recovers bridge passages missed by similarity-based methods. Then, evidenceneed mining with noisy-OR coverage refinement selects a compact, non-redundant evidence set satisfying distinct question facets. Experiments on three multi-hop and two simple QA benchmarks show EvLink consistently outperforms leading GraphRAG baselines with average gains of 2.4 R@5, 1.9 EM, and 2.4 F1

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

LineageRAG: Harnessing GraphRAG by Constructing Evidence Lineages with Source Grounding

Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) retrieves evidence for multi-hop questions over structured cor- pus graphs. Existing GraphRAG methods leave the connection between evidence discovery and source grounding implicit. We propose LineageRAG, which constructs one evidence lin- eage for each query-derived evidence demand and completes it with a verbatim source span when the selected evidence supports that demand. LineageRAG first initializes the evi- dence demands. It then expands each lineage through demand- conditioned retrieval over the corpus graph while retaining the demand associated with every candidate. Lineage completion uses this provenance to select complementary passages and grounds supported demands in verbatim source text. Experi- ments on HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and MuSiQue show that LineageRAG improves R@5, EM, and F1 by 3.51, 5.96, and 5.22 points on average over leading GraphRAG baselines.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

HELENA:Hierarchical Sparse Coordination over a Union of Complementary Topologies for MAS

LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) typically optimize a single topology, restricting reasoning to a narrow trajectory and limiting comprehensive analytical capacity. Naively merging multiple topologies into a composite graph introduces redundant noise propagation across irrelevant connections, degrading solution quality. To address this dilemma, we propose \textbf{Hierarchical Sparse Coordination over a Union of Complementary Topologies for MAS (HELENA)}, a multi-agent framework that balances diverse reasoning paths with sparse task-dependent execution. \helena{} constructs a union MAS graph from complementary candidate topologies selected via Monte Carlo Tree Search and Determinantal Point Process, broadening the reasoning trajectory for comprehensive analysis of complex problems. A Hierarchical Sparse Coordination module then activates only a sparse subgraph at each step while agents exchange compressed latent briefs to suppress redundant noise propagation. Finally, a Local Self-Refinement stage identifies decision units with discrepancy evidence and rewrites them only when contrastive evidence simultaneously confirms a reliable solution-side failure and a challenger-side improvement. Experiments across eight benchmarks show that \helena{} achieves state-of-the-art results on all benchmarks, with an average gain of \pctup{3.47} over the strongest baseline and up to \pctup{10.34} on MMLU-Pro, achieving larger improvements on harder benchmarks at a reasonable additional cost.

cs.MA↗