arXiv subjects

Linbo Wang

Publications and source records attributed to Linbo Wang.

50 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

arXiv2022

IV estimation of causal hazard ratio

Cox's proportional hazards model is one of the most popular statistical models to evaluate associations of exposure with a censored failure time outcome. When confounding factors are not fully observed, the exposure hazard ratio estimated using a Cox model is subject to unmeasured confounding bias. To address this, we propose a novel approach for the identification and estimation of the causal hazard ratio in the presence of unmeasured confounding factors. Our approach is based on a binary instrumental variable, and an additional no-interaction assumption in a first stage regression of the treatment on the IV and unmeasured confounders. We propose, to the best of our knowledge, the first consistent estimator of the (population) causal hazard ratio within an instrumental variable framework. A version of our estimator admits a closed-form representation. We derive the asymptotic distribution of our estimator, and provide a consistent estimator for its asymptotic variance. Our approach is illustrated via simulation studies and a data application.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

Robust Estimation of Propensity Score Weights via Subclassification

Weighting estimators based on propensity scores are widely used for causal estimation in a variety of contexts, such as observational studies, marginal structural models and interference. They enjoy appealing theoretical properties such as consistency and possible efficiency under correct model specification. However, this theoretical appeal may be diminished in practice by sensitivity to misspecification of the propensity score model. To improve on this, we borrow an idea from an alternative approach to causal effect estimation in observational studies, namely subclassification estimators. It is well known that compared to weighting estimators, subclassification methods are usually more robust to model misspecification. In this paper, we first discuss an intrinsic connection between the seemingly unrelated weighting and subclassification estimators, and then use this connection to construct robust propensity score weights via subclassification. We illustrate this idea by proposing so-called full-classification weights and accompanying estimators for causal effect estimation in observational studies. Our novel estimators are both consistent and robust to model misspecification, thereby combining the strengths of traditional weighting and subclassification estimators for causal effect estimation from observational studies. Numerical studies show that the proposed estimators perform favorably compared to existing methods.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

In Search of Robust Measures of Generalization

One of the principal scientific challenges in deep learning is explaining generalization, i.e., why the particular way the community now trains networks to achieve small training error also leads to small error on held-out data from the same population. It is widely appreciated that some worst-case theories -- such as those based on the VC dimension of the class of predictors induced by modern neural network architectures -- are unable to explain empirical performance. A large volume of work aims to close this gap, primarily by developing bounds on generalization error, optimization error, and excess risk. When evaluated empirically, however, most of these bounds are numerically vacuous. Focusing on generalization bounds, this work addresses the question of how to evaluate such bounds empirically. Jiang et al. (2020) recently described a large-scale empirical study aimed at uncovering potential causal relationships between bounds/measures and generalization. Building on their study, we highlight where their proposed methods can obscure failures and successes of generalization measures in explaining generalization. We argue that generalization measures should instead be evaluated within the framework of distributional robustness.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

Identifiability of causal effects with multiple causes and a binary outcome

Unobserved confounding presents a major threat to causal inference from observational studies. Recently, several authors suggest that this problem may be overcome in a shared confounding setting where multiple treatments are independent given a common latent confounder. It has been shown that under a linear Gaussian model for the treatments, the causal effect is not identifiable without parametric assumptions on the outcome model. In this paper, we show that the causal effect is indeed identifiable if we assume a general binary choice model for the outcome with a non-probit link. Our identification approach is based on the incongruence between Gaussianity of the treatments and latent confounder, and non-Gaussianity of a latent outcome variable. We further develop a two-step likelihood-based estimation procedure.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

Conditional Independence Beyond Domain Separability: Discussion of Engelke and Hitz (2020)

We congratulate Engelke and Hitz on a thought-provoking paper on graphical models for extremes. A key contribution of the paper is the introduction of a novel definition of conditional independence for a multivariate Pareto distribution. Here, we outline a proposal for independence and conditional independence of general random variables whose support is a general set Omega in multidimensional real number space. Our proposal includes the authors' definition of conditional independence, and the analogous definition of independence as special cases. By making our proposal independent of the context of extreme value theory, we highlight the importance of the authors' contribution beyond this particular context.

math.ST↗

arXiv2020

Causal inference in degenerate systems: An impossibility result

Causal relationships among variables are commonly represented via directed acyclic graphs. There are many methods in the literature to quantify the strength of arrows in a causal acyclic graph. These methods, however, have undesirable properties when the causal system represented by a directed acyclic graph is degenerate. In this paper, we characterize a degenerate causal system using multiplicity of Markov boundaries. We show that in this case, it is impossible to find an identifiable quantitative measure of causal effects that satisfy a set of natural criteria. To supplement the impossibility result, we also develop algorithms to identify degenerate causal systems from observed data. Performance of our algorithms is investigated through synthetic data analysis.

math.ST↗

arXiv2019

Causal inference with confounders missing not at random

It is important to draw causal inference from observational studies, which, however, becomes challenging if the confounders have missing values. Generally, causal effects are not identifiable if the confounders are missing not at random. We propose a novel framework to nonparametrically identify causal effects with confounders subject to an outcome-independent missingness, that is, the missing data mechanism is independent of the outcome, given the treatment and possibly missing confounders. We then propose a nonparametric two-stage least squares estimator and a parametric estimator for causal effects.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2018

Identification and Estimation of Causal Effects with Outcomes Truncated by Death

It is common in medical studies that the outcome of interest is truncated by death, meaning that a subject has died before the outcome could be measured. In this case, restricted analysis among survivors may be subject to selection bias. Hence, it is of interest to estimate the survivor average causal effect, defined as the average causal effect among the subgroup consisting of subjects who would survive under either exposure. In this paper, we consider the identification and estimation problems of the survivor average causal effect. We propose to use a substitution variable in place of the latent membership in the always-survivor group. The identification conditions required for a substitution variable are conceptually similar to conditions for a conditional instrumental variable, and may apply to both randomized and observational studies. We show that the survivor average causal effect is identifiable with use of such a substitution variable, and propose novel model parameterizations for estimation of the survivor average causal effect under our identification assumptions. Our approaches are illustrated via simulation studies and a data analysis.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2018

Bounded, efficient and multiply robust estimation of average treatment effects using instrumental variables

Instrumental variables (IVs) are widely used for estimating causal effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding. Under the standard IV model, however, the average treatment effect (ATE) is only partially identifiable. To address this, we propose novel assumptions that allow for identification of the ATE. Our identification assumptions are clearly separated from model assumptions needed for estimation, so that researchers are not required to commit to a specific observed data model in establishing identification. We then construct multiple estimators that are consistent under three different observed data models, and multiply robust estimators that are consistent in the union of these observed data models. We pay special attention to the case of binary outcomes, for which we obtain bounded estimators of the ATE that are guaranteed to lie between -1 and 1. Our approaches are illustrated with simulations and a data analysis evaluating the causal effect of education on earnings.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2017

Discrete Choice Models for Nonmonotone Nonignorable Missing Data: Identification and Inference

Nonmonotone missing data arise routinely in empirical studies of social and health sciences, and when ignored, can induce selection bias and loss of efficiency. In practice, it is common to account for nonresponse under a missing-at-random assumption which although convenient, is rarely appropriate when nonresponse is nonmonotone. Likelihood and Bayesian missing data methodologies often require specification of a parametric model for the full data law, thus a priori ruling out any prospect for semiparametric inference. In this paper, we propose an all-purpose approach which delivers semiparametric inferences when missing data are nonmonotone and not at random. The approach is based on a discrete choice model (DCM) as a means to generate a large class of nonmonotone nonresponse mechanisms that are nonignorable. Sufficient conditions for nonparametric identification are given, and a general framework for fully parametric and semiparametric inference under an arbitrary DCM is proposed. Special consideration is given to the case of logit discrete choice nonresponse model (LDCM) for which we describe generalizations of inverse-probability weighting, pattern-mixture estimation, doubly robust estimation and multiply robust estimation.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2017

Viewpoint Selection for Photographing Architectures

This paper studies the problem of how to choose good viewpoints for taking photographs of architectures. We achieve this by learning from professional photographs of world famous landmarks that are available on the Internet. Unlike previous efforts devoted to photo quality assessment which mainly rely on 2D image features, we show in this paper combining 2D image features extracted from images with 3D geometric features computed on the 3D models can result in more reliable evaluation of viewpoint quality. Specifically, we collect a set of photographs for each of 15 world famous architectures as well as their 3D models from the Internet. Viewpoint recovery for images is carried out through an image-model registration process, after which a newly proposed viewpoint clustering strategy is exploited to validate users' viewpoint preferences when photographing landmarks. Finally, we extract a number of 2D and 3D features for each image based on multiple visual and geometric cues and perform viewpoint recommendation by learning from both 2D and 3D features using a specifically designed SVM-2K multi-view learner, achieving superior performance over using solely 2D or 3D features. We show the effectiveness of the proposed approach through extensive experiments. The experiments also demonstrate that our system can be used to recommend viewpoints for rendering textured 3D models of buildings for the use of architectural design, in addition to viewpoint evaluation of photographs and recommendation of viewpoints for photographing architectures in practice.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2016

Causal analysis of ordinal treatments and binary outcomes under truncation by death

It is common that in multiarm randomized trials, the outcome of interest is "truncated by death," meaning that it is only observed or well defined conditioning on an intermediate outcome. In this case, in addition to pairwise contrasts, the joint inference for all treatment arms is also of interest. Under a monotonicity assumption we present methods for both pairwise and joint causal analyses of ordinal treatments and binary outcomes in presence of truncation by death. We illustrate via examples the appropriateness of our assumptions in different scientific contexts.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2016

On falsification of the binary instrumental variable model

Instrumental variables are widely used for estimating causal effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding. The discrete instrumental variable model has testable implications on the law of the observed data. However, current assessments of instrumental validity are typically based solely on subject-matter arguments rather than these testable implications, partly due to a lack of formal statistical tests with known properties. In this paper, we develop simple procedures for testing the binary instrumental variable model. Our methods are based on existing approaches for comparing two treatments, such as the t-test and the Gail--Simon test. We illustrate the importance of testing the instrumental variable model by evaluating the exogeneity of college proximity using the National Longitudinal Survey of Young Men.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2016

On Modeling and Estimation for the Relative Risk and Risk Difference

A common problem in formulating models for the relative risk and risk difference is the variation dependence between these parameters and the baseline risk, which is a nuisance model. We address this problem by proposing the conditional log odds-product as a preferred nuisance model. This novel nuisance model facilitates maximum-likelihood estimation, but also permits doubly-robust estimation for the parameters of interest. Our approach is illustrated via simulations and a data analysis.

stat.ME↗