arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Lijian Wu

Publications and source records attributed to Lijian Wu.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

ChartJudgeBench: Evaluating LMM Judges for Chart-to-Code Generation

Building strong chart-to-code systems increasingly relies on reinforcement learning, whose effectiveness depends critically on the quality of the reward signal. Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) play a natural critical role in jointly assessing chart visual appearance and task requirements. They are therefore increasingly used as visual critics and reward models, yet their reliability as judges remains largely unexplored. To this end, we introduce ChartJudgeBench, a diagnostic vision-language benchmark for assessing LMM judges in chart-to-code workflows. It includes 1,003 Chart Perception Alignment (CPA) instances for pairwise chart comparison and 650 Chart Reasoning Judgment (CRJ) instances for binary Accept/Reject verification in Chart Reproduction and Chart Editing. Together, these tasks emulate the core judging decisions required in agentic refinement and RL-based chart optimization. Our evaluation of strong LMMs reveals four systematic limitations: (i) positional bias in pairwise comparison, (ii) a strong tendency to overpredict Accept, (iii) difficulty in matching visual styles and aesthetics, and (iv) an unexpected leniency bias in RL-trained models. These findings show that current LMM judges require explicit reliability validation before being used as critics or reward models in chart-to-code optimization. The code and data are available on ChartJudgeBench.

cs.CV

From Charts to Code: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Multimodal Models

We introduce Chart2Code, a new benchmark for evaluating the chart understanding and code generation capabilities of large multimodal models (LMMs). Chart2Code is explicitly designed from a user-driven perspective, capturing diverse real-world scenarios and progressively increasing task difficulty. It consists of three levels: Level 1 (Chart Reproduction) reproduces charts from a reference figure and user query; Level 2 (Chart Editing) involves complex modifications such as changing chart types or adding elements; and Level 3 (Long-Table to Chart Generation) requires models to transform long, information-dense tables into faithful charts following user instructions. To our knowledge, this is the first hierarchical benchmark that reflects practical chart2code usage while systematically scaling task complexity. In total, Chart2Code contains 2,023 tasks across 22 chart types, paired with multi-level evaluation metrics that assess both code correctness and the visual fidelity of rendered charts. We benchmark 25 state-of-the-art (SoTA) LMMs, including both proprietary and the latest open-source models such as GPT-5, Qwen2.5-VL, InternVL3/3.5, MiMo-VL, and Seed-1.6-VL. Experimental results demonstrate that even the SoTA model GPT-5 averages only 0.57 on code-based evaluation and 0.22 on chart-quality assessment across the editing tasks, underscoring the difficulty of Chart2Code. We anticipate this benchmark will drive advances in multimodal reasoning and foster the development of more robust and general-purpose LMMs. Our code and data are available on Chart2Code.

cs.SE

RDPP-TD: Reputation and Data Privacy-Preserving based Truth Discovery Scheme in Mobile Crowdsensing

Truth discovery (TD) plays an important role in Mobile Crowdsensing (MCS). However, existing TD methods, including privacy-preserving TD approaches, estimate the truth by weighting only the data submitted in the current round, which often results in low data quality. Moreover, there is a lack of effective TD methods that preserve both reputation and data privacy. To address these issues, a Reputation and Data Privacy-Preserving based Truth Discovery (RDPP-TD) scheme is proposed to obtain high-quality data for MCS. The RDPP-TD scheme consists of two key approaches: a Reputation-based Truth Discovery (RTD) approach, which integrates the weight of current-round data with workers' reputation values to estimate the truth, thereby achieving more accurate results, and a Reputation and Data Privacy-Preserving (RDPP) approach, which ensures privacy preservation for sensing data and reputation values. First, the RDPP approach, when seamlessly integrated with RTD, can effectively evaluate the reliability of workers and their sensing data in a privacy-preserving manner. Second, the RDPP scheme supports reputation-based worker recruitment and rewards, ensuring high-quality data collection while incentivizing workers to provide accurate information. Comprehensive theoretical analysis and extensive experiments based on real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed RDPP-TD scheme provides strong privacy protection and improves data quality by up to 33.3%.

cs.CE