arXiv subjects

Liang Lyu

Publications and source records attributed to Liang Lyu.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

MMH-Planner: Multi-Mode Hybrid Trajectory Planning Method for UAV Efficient Flight Based on Real-Time Spatial Awareness

Motion planning is a critical component of intelligent unmanned systems, enabling their complex autonomous operations. However, current planning algorithms still face limitations in planning efficiency due to inflexible strategies and weak adaptability. To address this, this paper proposes a multi-mode hybrid trajectory planning method for UAVs based on real-time environmental awareness, which dynamically selects the optimal planning model for high-quality trajectory generation in response to environmental changes. First, we introduce a goal-oriented spatial awareness method that rapidly assesses flight safety in the upcoming environments. Second, a multi-mode hybrid trajectory planning mechanism is proposed, which can enhance the planning efficiency by selecting the optimal planning model for trajectory generation based on prior spatial awareness. Finally, we design a lazy replanning strategy that triggers replanning only when necessary to reduce computational resource consumption while maintaining flight quality. To validate the performance of the proposed method, we conducted comprehensive comparative experiments in simulation environments. Results demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) algorithms across multiple metrics, achieving the best performance particularly in terms of the average number of planning iterations and computational cost per iteration. Furthermore, the effectiveness of our approach is further verified through real-world flight experiments integrated with a self-developed intelligent UAV platform.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

A Bayesian Framework for Human-AI Collaboration: Complementarity and Correlation Neglect

We develop a decision-theoretic model of human-AI interaction to study when AI assistance improves or impairs human decision-making. A human decision-maker observes private information and receives a recommendation from an AI system, but may combine these signals imperfectly. We show that the effect of AI assistance decomposes into two main forces: the marginal informational value of the AI beyond what the human already knows, and a behavioral distortion arising from how the human uses the AI's recommendation. Central to our analysis is a micro-founded measure of informational overlap between human and AI knowledge. We study an empirically relevant form of imperfect decision-making -- correlation neglect -- whereby humans treat AI recommendations as independent of their own information despite shared evidence. Under this model, we characterize how overlap and AI capabilities shape the Human-AI interaction regime between augmentation, impairment, complementarity, and automation, and draw key insights.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Clinician-Friendly Foundation Models for Ophthalmic Image Diagnostics without Fine-Tuning or Technical Barriers

Artificial intelligence (AI) shows remarkable potential in medical imaging diagnostics, yet most current models require retraining when applied across different clinical settings, limiting their scalability. We developed GlobeReady, a deployment-oriented platform powered by the RetiGlobe foun- dation model and local feature augmentation. RetiGlobe was pretrained in two stages: 1) self-supervised learning using DINOv2 on 38 million synthetic ophthalmic images, and 2) contrastive learning using CLIP on 475,845 real image-text pairs spanning diverse ethnicities, imaging devices, and geographic regions worldwide. We evaluate GlobeReady on 488,448 ophthalmic images, including color fundus photographs (CFPs) and optical coherence tomography scans, from multi-centres in China, Singapore, Vietnam and the UK. Prospective testing included usability assessment with 31 ophthalmologists. Exploratory analyses evaluated domain generalisability, Bayesian uncertainty quantification, out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, and feature-based case retrieval.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Wikipedia Contributions in the Wake of ChatGPT

How has Wikipedia activity changed for articles with content similar to ChatGPT following its introduction? We estimate the impact using differences-in-differences models, with dissimilar Wikipedia articles as a baseline for comparison, to examine how changes in voluntary knowledge contributions and information-seeking behavior differ by article content. Our analysis reveals that newly created, popular articles whose content overlaps with ChatGPT 3.5 saw a greater decline in editing and viewership after the November 2022 launch of ChatGPT than dissimilar articles did. These findings indicate heterogeneous substitution effects, where users selectively engage less with existing platforms when AI provides comparable content. This points to potential uneven impacts on the future of human-driven online knowledge contributions.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

MisinfoEval: Generative AI in the Era of "Alternative Facts"

The spread of misinformation on social media platforms threatens democratic processes, contributes to massive economic losses, and endangers public health. Many efforts to address misinformation focus on a knowledge deficit model and propose interventions for improving users' critical thinking through access to facts. Such efforts are often hampered by challenges with scalability, and by platform users' personal biases. The emergence of generative AI presents promising opportunities for countering misinformation at scale across ideological barriers. In this paper, we introduce a framework (MisinfoEval) for generating and comprehensively evaluating large language model (LLM) based misinformation interventions. We present (1) an experiment with a simulated social media environment to measure effectiveness of misinformation interventions, and (2) a second experiment with personalized explanations tailored to the demographics and beliefs of users with the goal of countering misinformation by appealing to their pre-existing values. Our findings confirm that LLM-based interventions are highly effective at correcting user behavior (improving overall user accuracy at reliability labeling by up to 41.72%). Furthermore, we find that users favor more personalized interventions when making decisions about news reliability and users shown personalized interventions have significantly higher accuracy at identifying misinformation.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

Matching of Users and Creators in Two-Sided Markets with Departures

Many online platforms of today, including social media sites, are two-sided markets bridging content creators and users. Most of the existing literature on platform recommendation algorithms largely focuses on user preferences and decisions, and does not simultaneously address creator incentives. We propose a model of content recommendation that explicitly focuses on the dynamics of user-content matching, with the novel property that both users and creators may leave the platform permanently if they do not experience sufficient engagement. In our model, each player decides to participate at each time step based on utilities derived from the current match: users based on alignment of the recommended content with their preferences, and creators based on their audience size. We show that a user-centric greedy algorithm that does not consider creator departures can result in arbitrarily poor total engagement, relative to an algorithm that maximizes total engagement while accounting for two-sided departures. Moreover, in stark contrast to the case where only users or only creators leave the platform, we prove that with two-sided departures, approximating maximum total engagement within any constant factor is NP-hard. We present two practical algorithms, one with performance guarantees under mild assumptions on user preferences, and another that tends to outperform algorithms that ignore two-sided departures in practice.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Centrality with Diversity

Graph centrality measures use the structure of a network to quantify central or "important" nodes, with applications in web search, social media analysis, and graphical data mining generally. Traditional centrality measures such as the well known PageRank interpret a directed edge as a vote in favor of the importance of the linked node. We study the case where nodes may belong to diverse communities or interests and investigate centrality measures that can identify nodes that are simultaneously important to many such diverse communities. We propose a family of diverse centrality measures formed as fixed point solutions to a generalized nonlinear eigenvalue problem. Our measure can be efficiently computed on large graphs by iterated best response and we study its normative properties on both random graph models and real-world data. We find that we are consistently and efficiently able to identify the most important diverse nodes of a graph, that is, those that are simultaneously central to multiple communities.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2019

Proportionally Fair Clustering

We extend the fair machine learning literature by considering the problem of proportional centroid clustering in a metric context. For clustering $n$ points with $k$ centers, we define fairness as proportionality to mean that any $n/k$ points are entitled to form their own cluster if there is another center that is closer in distance for all $n/k$ points. We seek clustering solutions to which there are no such justified complaints from any subsets of agents, without assuming any a priori notion of protected subsets. We present and analyze algorithms to efficiently compute, optimize, and audit proportional solutions. We conclude with an empirical examination of the tradeoff between proportional solutions and the $k$-means objective.

cs.LG↗