arXiv subjects

Leroy Chew

Publications and source records attributed to Leroy Chew.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Reintroducing the Second Player in EPR

We present a PSPACE-complete fragment of first order logic we call QEALM (QBF-like EPR by Alternating Level-ordered Miniscoping). Unlike other well-known fragments it is closer to QBF (Quantified Boolean Formulas) in nature because it has game-like alternations and can be restricted to complete problems for the polynomial hierarchy. QEALM is a natural first-order analogue to QBF just as EPR (Effectively Propositional logic) is a first-order analogue to Dependency QBF. We prove the PSPACE and Polynomial Hierarchy completeness theorems of QEALM along with several other nice properties such as closure under Robinson's resolution and retained hardness after intersection with Schaefer fragments. We identify problems in the TPTP library that fall into this fragment and their level in the polynomial hierarchy.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

On Proof Systems for #QBF

For a quantified Boolean formula (QBF), the problem of computing the number of winning strategies is known as the #QBF problem. This problem is considered harder than the analogous #SAT problem. Recently, important proof systems for QBFs and #SAT have been studied. By extending the ideas from both fields, we show that it is possible to design proof systems for #QBF. Such proof systems are important not only for advancing the theory of #QBF but also for certifying and designing better #QBF solvers, an area that is still in its early stages. In this paper, we explore #QBF proof systems to count the number of Skolem functions. Apart from a naive system, we study #QBF systems based on the expansion rule of universal variables in QBFs. We observe that these systems have inherent structural weaknesses that lead to lower bounds. As an alternative, we propose a #QBF proof system that we call Q-MICE, which consists of sound inference rules for computing and certifying the #QBF solution, similar to the line-based #SAT proof system MICE. To demonstrate the strength of Q-MICE, we present various upper bounds, such as the quantified version of the propositional XOR-PAIRS formula, which are known to be hard for MICE. Consequently, we also separate Q-MICE from the expansion-based #QBF proof systems.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Strong (D)QBF Dependency Schemes via Pure Paths with Applications to Proof Checking

Certification for Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF) and Dependency Quantified Boolean Formulas (DQBF) is an ongoing challenge. Recent proof complexity work has shown that the majority of QBF and DQBF techniques can be p-simulated by using the independent extension rule. In propositional logic, extension rules are supported by proof checkers using a more general RAT (Resolution Asymmetric Tautology) rule. The next step in (D)QBF certification would be to update these modern RAT formats to match the strength of this independent extension rule. In this paper we first introduce a new dependency scheme called Dpure. This rule is the missing ingredient that when added to Blinkhorn's proof system DQRAT allows it to be provably p-equivalent to the Independent Extended QU-Res, the most powerful of the known QBF and DQBF proof systems. Up until now, DQRAT has only existed in theory, so we implement a prototype checker DQRAT-check which includes our extra rule. In addition to its inclusion in our proof checker we show Dpure has other properties that have been found for previous dependency schemes, and each of these observations has potential in solving/checking including the sound integration into the dependency learning solver Qute.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

An Expansion-Based Approach for Quantified Integer Programming

Quantified Integer Programming (QIP) bridges multiple domains by extending Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF) to incorporate general integer variables and linear constraints while also generalizing Integer Programming through variable quantification. As a special case of Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problems (QCSP), QIP provides a versatile framework for addressing complex decision-making scenarios. Additionally, the inclusion of a linear objective function enables QIP to effectively model multistage robust discrete linear optimization problems, making it a powerful tool for tackling uncertainty in optimization. While two primary solution paradigms exist for QBF -- search-based and expansion-based approaches -- only search-based methods have been explored for QIP and QCSP. We introduce an expansion-based approach for QIP using Counterexample-Guided Abstraction Refinement (CEGAR), adapting techniques from QBF. We extend this methodology to tackle multistage robust discrete optimization problems with linear constraints and further embed it in an optimization framework, enhancing its applicability. Our experimental results highlight the advantages of this approach, demonstrating superior performance over existing search-based solvers for QIP in specific instances. Furthermore, the ability to model problems using linear constraints enables notable performance gains over state-of-the-art expansion-based solvers for QBF.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2025

Better Extension Variables in DQBF via Independence

We show that extension variables in (D)QBF can be generalised by conditioning on universal assignments. The benefit of this is that the dependency sets of such conditioned extension variables can be made smaller to allow easier refutations. This simple modification instantly solves many challenges in p-simulating the QBF expansion rule, which cannot be p-simulated in proof systems that have strategy extraction. Simulating expansion is even more crucial in DQBF, where other methods are incomplete. In this paper we provide an overview of the strength of this new independent extension rule. We find that a new version of Extended Frege called IndExtFrege+Red can p-simulate a multitude of difficult QBF and DQBF techniques, even techniques that are difficult to approach with ExtFrege+Red. We show six p-simulations, that IndExtFrege+Red p-simulates QRAT, IR(D)-Calc, Q(Drrs)-Res, Fork Resolution, DQRAT and G, which together underpin most DQBF solving and preprocessing techniques. The p-simulations work despite these systems using complicated rules and our new extension rule being relatively simple. Moreover, unlike recent p-simulations by ExtFrege+Red we can simulate the proof rules line by line, which allows us to mix QBF rules more easily with other inference steps.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

Towards Uniform Certification in QBF

We pioneer a new technique that allows us to prove a multitude of previously open simulations in QBF proof complexity. In particular, we show that extended QBF Frege p-simulates clausal proof systems such as IR-Calculus, IRM-Calculus, Long-Distance Q-Resolution, and Merge Resolution. These results are obtained by taking a technique of Beyersdorff et al. (JACM 2020) that turns strategy extraction into simulation and combining it with new local strategy extraction arguments. This approach leads to simulations that are carried out mainly in propositional logic, with minimal use of the QBF rules. Our proofs therefore provide a new, largely propositional interpretation of the simulated systems. We argue that these results strengthen the case for uniform certification in QBF solving, since many QBF proof systems now fall into place underneath extended QBF Frege.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

Hardness of Random Reordered Encodings of Parity for Resolution and CDCL

Parity reasoning is challenging for Conflict-Driven Clause Learning (CDCL) SAT solvers. This has been observed even for simple formulas encoding two contradictory parity constraints with different variable orders (Chew and Heule 2020). We provide an analytical explanation for their hardness by showing that they require exponential resolution refutations with high probability when the variable order is chosen at random. We obtain this result by proving that these formulas, which are known to be Tseitin formulas, have Tseitin graphs of linear treewidth with high probability. Since such Tseitin formulas require exponential resolution proofs, our result follows. We generalize this argument to a new class of formulas that capture a basic form of parity reasoning involving a sum of two random parity constraints with random orders. Even when the variable order for the sum is chosen favorably, these formulas remain hard for resolution. In contrast, we prove that they have short DRAT refutations. We show experimentally that the running time of CDCL SAT solvers on both classes of formulas grows exponentially with their treewidth.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2020

Avoiding Monochromatic Rectangles Using Shift Patterns

Ramsey Theory deals with avoiding certain patterns. When constructing an instance that avoids one pattern, it is observed that other patterns emerge. For example, repetition emerges when avoiding arithmetic progression (Van der Waerden numbers), while reflection emerges when avoiding monochromatic solutions of $a+b=c$ (Schur numbers). We exploit observed patterns when coloring a grid while avoiding monochromatic rectangles. Like many problems in Ramsey Theory, this problem has a rapidly growing search space that makes computer search difficult. Steinbach et al. obtained a solution of an 18 by 18 grid with 4 colors by enforcing a rotation symmetry. However, that symmetry is not suitable for 5 colors. In this article, we will encode this problem into propositional logic and enforce so-called internal symmetries, which preserves satisfiability, to guide SAT-solving. We first observe patterns with 2 and 3 colors, among which the "shift pattern" can be easily generalized and efficiently encoded. Using this pattern, we obtain a new solution of the 18 by 18 grid that is non-isomorphic to the known solution. We further analyze the pattern and obtain necessary conditions to further trim down the search space. We conclude with our attempts on finding a 5-coloring of a 26 by 26 grid, as well as further open problems on the shift pattern.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2017

Feasible Interpolation for QBF Resolution Calculi

In sharp contrast to classical proof complexity we are currently short of lower bound techniques for QBF proof systems. In this paper we establish the feasible interpolation technique for all resolution-based QBF systems, whether modelling CDCL or expansion-based solving. This both provides the first general lower bound method for QBF proof systems as well as largely extends the scope of classical feasible interpolation. We apply our technique to obtain new exponential lower bounds to all resolution-based QBF systems for a new class of QBF formulas based on the clique problem. Finally, we show how feasible interpolation relates to the recently established lower bound method based on strategy extraction.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2016

Lifting QBF Resolution Calculi to DQBF

We examine the existing Resolution systems for quantified Boolean formulas (QBF) and answer the question which of these calculi can be lifted to the more powerful Dependency QBFs (DQBF). An interesting picture emerges: While for QBF we have the strict chain of proof systems Q-Resolution < IR-calc < IRM-calc, the situation is quite different in DQBF. Q-Resolution and likewise universal Resolution are too weak: they are not complete. IR-calc has the right strength: it is sound and complete. IRM-calc is too strong: it is not sound any more, and the same applies to long-distance Resolution. Conceptually, we use the relation of DQBF to EPR and explain our new DQBF calculus based on IR-calc as a subsystem of FO-Resolution.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2014

Tableau vs. Sequent Calculi for Minimal Entailment

In this paper we compare two proof systems for minimal entailment: a tableau system OTAB and a sequent calculus MLK, both developed by Olivetti (1992). Our main result shows that OTAB-proofs can be efficiently translated into MLK-proofs, i.e; MLK p-simulates OTAB. The simulation is technically very involved and answers an open question posed by Olivetti (1992) on the relation between the two calculi. We also show that the two systems are exponentially separated, i.e; there are formulas which have polynomial size MLK-proofs, but require exponential-size OTAB- proofs.

cs.LO↗