Leqing Chen | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Evidence-Guided Detection, Localization and Explanation for Text-Centric Image Forensics

The rapid progress of AIGC has made text-centric image manipulation increasingly accessible, creating new forensic challenges that require not only authenticity detection but also spatial grounding and evidence-based explanation. This paper presents our solution to the GenText-Forensics Challenge at ACM Multimedia 2026. We propose an evidence-guided detector-localizer-reasoner system, where an image-level detector provides a global authenticity prior, a dedicated localizer extracts tampered regions as spatial grounding evidence, and an MLLM-based reasoner generates structured forensic reports grounded in this expert forensic evidence. These modules are connected through a cascaded evidence flow: the detector gates the subsequent localization and prompting process, the localizer converts tamper responses into grounding boxes, and the reasoner is trained to synthesize the detector decision and localized evidence into the final report. As a key part of our method, we introduce iterative difficulty-aware mining to improve localization quality and apply report-mask consistency post-processing to align report grounding with predicted masks. On the official hidden test set, our system achieves a final score of 0.638 and ranks second in the challenge, validating the effectiveness of the proposed evidence-guided system. The code is available at https://github.com/peifengLiu42/ACMMM26-evidence-guided-detector-localizer-reasoner-system.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

ReactBench: A Benchmark for Topological Reasoning in MLLMs on Chemical Reaction Diagrams

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel at recognizing individual visual elements and reasoning over simple linear diagrams. However, when faced with complex topological structures involving branching paths, converging flows, and cyclic dependencies, their reasoning capabilities degrade sharply, even on tasks as basic as counting endpoints. Existing benchmarks fail to probe this gap, focusing on semantic comprehension rather than structural reasoning. We introduce ReactBench, a benchmark that reveals fundamental limitations in structural reasoning through chemical reaction diagrams. These real-world scientific diagrams offer an ideal testbed because they naturally span diverse structures from linear chains to cyclic graphs, while requiring both precise local recognition and coherent global reasoning. Our benchmark comprises 1,618 expert-annotated QA pairs across four hierarchical task dimensions. Extensive evaluation across 24 MLLMs reveals a significant performance gap exceeding 30% between anchor-based tasks and holistic structural reasoning tasks. Controlled ablations confirm this bottleneck lies in reasoning, not perception. These findings expose a fundamental deficit in structural understanding and establish directions for advancing visual reasoning.

cs.AI↗