Voice-Based AI Feedback in Higher Education: A Field Study on Quality and Actionability
Student feedback is a critical input for continuous improvement in higher education, yet traditional end-of-semester written surveys suffer from low response rates, superficial answers, satisficing, and limited actionability. Voice-based conversational AI agents can conduct structured interviews at scale, asking open-ended questions and probing follow-ups, and may capture richer qualitative feedback than written instruments. This research proposal asks what characteristics, depth, and strategic value feedback collected through voice-based conversational AI agents has in higher education, and whether such agents elicit detailed, honest, and actionable feedback that can support instructional improvement and institutional learning. Drawing on survey-mode-effects research, the Computers As Social Actors (CASA) paradigm, and dynamic capabilities theory, we develop three hypotheses on elaboration, social presence and disclosure, and actionability. A completed technical pilot at the Technical University of Munich established the feasibility of telephone-based AI interviews; the main field study is planned for the "Advanced Leadership Communication" course at MIT Sloan with approximately 60 students, using a convergent mixed-methods design and a four-dimensional coding framework for actionability (specificity, thematic richness, constructive orientation, contextual depth). The study extends CASA theory to evaluative educational settings, characterizes voice-based AI as a distinct feedback modality, and links micro-level feedback quality to institutional sensing capabilities.