arXiv subjects

Laurent Feuilloley

Publications and source records attributed to Laurent Feuilloley.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The local complexity of certifying parity

In this paper, we consider the problem of locally certifying that the size of a network is even, or more generally, congruent to some fixed number. The parity property is one of the simplest global properties, and it plays an intriguing role in local certification. On the one hand, it is one of the simplest properties in cycles because it is equivalent to 2-colorability, and hence can be certified with a single bit. On the other hand, in general graphs, no non-trivial lower bound on the size of the certificates is known, and the known upper bound basically consists in certifying the \emph{exact} value of $n$. In addition, the nature of the problem makes all the known lower bound approaches fail. We uncover a surprising landscape for parity across different models and graph structures: * In general graphs equipped with identifiers, when allowing verification radius 2, parity can be certified with a constant number of bits. * But in the model of anonymous graphs and allowing verification radius only 1, parity requires $\Omega(\log \log^*n)$ bits. * Finally, in bounded expansion graph classes (such as bounded-degree graphs and planar graphs), the lower bound does not apply: in the same restricted model we can design a constant-size certification. We introduce several new tools that we expect to be useful in other contexts, in particular ways to \emph{encode a parent at each node with a constant number of bits} (via implicit use of the IDs and conflict-free colorings) and a new lower bound technique, with complex topologies and higher-order Ramsey-type arguments.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

Polynomial Time Local Decision Revisited

We consider three classification systems for distributed decision tasks: With unbounded computation and certificates, defined by Balliu, D'Angelo, Fraigniaud, and Olivetti [JCSS'18], and with (two flavors of) polynomially bounded local computation and certificates, defined in recent works by Aldema Tshuva and Oshman [OPODIS'23], and by Reiter [PODC'24]. The latter two differ in the way they evaluate the polynomial bounds: the former considers polynomials with respect to the size of the graph, while the latter refers to being polynomial in the size of each node's local neighborhood. We start by revisiting decision without certificates. For this scenario, we show that the latter two definitions coincide: roughly, a node cannot know the graph size, and thus can only use a running time dependent on its neighborhood. We then consider decision with certificates. With existential certificates ($\Sigma_1$-type classes), a larger running time defines strictly larger classes of languages: when it grows from being polynomial in each node's view, through polynomial in the graph's size, and to unbounded, the derived classes strictly contain each other. With universal certificates ($\Pi_1$-type classes), on the other hand, we prove a surprising incomparability result: having running time bounded by the graph size sometimes allows us to decide languages undecidable even with unbounded certificates. We complement these results with other containment and separation results, which together portray a surprisingly complex lattice of strict containment relations between the classes at the base of the three classification systems.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

Proving there is a leader without naming it

Local certification is a mechanism for certifying to the nodes of a network that a certain property holds. In this framework, nodes are assigned labels, called certificates, which are supposed to prove that the property holds. The nodes then communicate with their neighbors to verify the correctness of these certificates. Certifying that there is a unique leader in a network is one of the most classical problems in this setting. It is well-known that this can be done using certificates that encode node identifiers and distances in the graph. These require $O(\log n)$ and $O(\log D)$ bits respectively, where $n$ is the number of nodes and $D$ is the diameter. A matching lower bound is known in cycle graphs (where $n$ and $D$ are equal up to multiplicative constants). A recent line of work has shown that network structure greatly influences local certification. For example, certifying that a network does not contain triangles takes $\Theta(n)$ bits in general graphs, but only $O(\log n)$ bits in graphs of bounded treewidth. This observation raises the question: Is it possible to achieve sublogarithmic leader certification in graph classes that do not contain cycle graphs? And since in that case we cannot write identifiers in a certificate, do we actually need identifiers at all in such topologies? [We answer these questions with results on small diameter graphs, chordal graphs, grids, and dense graphs. See full abstract in the paper.]

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

Complexity landscape for local certification

An impressive recent line of work has charted the complexity landscape of distributed graph algorithms. For many settings, it has been determined which time complexities exist, and which do not (in the sense that no local problem could have an optimal algorithm with that complexity). In this paper, we initiate the study of the landscape for space complexity of distributed graph algorithms. More precisely, we focus on the local certification setting, where a prover assigns certificates to nodes to certify a property, and where the space complexity is measured by the size of the certificates. Already for anonymous paths and cycles, we unveil a surprising landscape: - There is a gap between complexity $O(1)$ and $\Theta(\log \log n)$ in paths. This is the first gap established in local certification. - There exists a property that has complexity $\Theta(\log \log n)$ in paths, a regime that was not known to exist for a natural property. - There is a gap between complexity $O(1)$ and $\Theta(\log n)$ in cycles, hence a gap that is exponentially larger than for paths. We then generalize our result for paths to the class of trees. Namely, we show that there is a gap between complexity $O(1)$ and $\Theta(\log \log d)$ in trees, where $d$ is the diameter. We finally describe some settings where there are no gaps at all. To prove our results we develop a new toolkit, based on various results of automata theory and arithmetic, which is of independent interest.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Renaming in distributed certification

Local certification is the area of distributed network computing asking the following question: How to certify to the nodes of a network that a global property holds, if they are limited to a local verification? In this area, it is often essential to have identifiers, that is, unique integers assigned to the nodes. In this short paper, we show how to reduce the range of the identifiers, in three different settings. More precisely, we show how to rename identifiers in the classical local certification setting, when we can (resp.\ cannot) choose the new identifiers, and we show how a global certificate can help to encode very compactly a new identifier assignment that is not injective in general, but still useful in applications. We conclude with a number of applications of these results: For every $\ell$, there are local certification schemes for the properties of having clique number at most $\ell$, having diameter at most $\ell$, and having independence number at most~2, with certificates of size $O(n)$. We also show that there is a global certification scheme for bipartiteness with a certificate of size $O(n)$. All these results are optimal.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

How local constraints influence network diameter and applications to LCL generalizations

In this paper, we investigate how local rules enforced at every node can influence the topology of a network. More precisely, we establish several results on the diameter of trees as a function of the number of nodes, as listed below. These results have important consequences on the landscape of locally checkable labelings (LCL) on \emph{unbounded} degree graphs, a case in which our lack of knowledge is in striking contrast with that of \emph{bounded degree graphs}, that has been intensively studied recently. [See paper for full abstract.]

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Decreasing verification radius in local certification

This paper deals with local certification, specifically locally checkable proofs: given a graph property, the task is to certify whether a graph satisfies the property. The verification of this certification needs to be done locally without the knowledge of the whole graph. More precisely, a distributed algorithm, called a verifier, is executed on each vertex. The verifier observes the local neighborhood up to a constant distance and either accepts or rejects. We examine the trade-off between the visibility radius and the size of certificates. We describe a procedure that decreases the radius by encoding the neighbourhood of each vertex into its certificate. We also provide a corresponding lower bound on the required certificate size increase, showing that such an approach is close to optimal.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Local certification of forbidden subgraphs

Detecting specific structures in a network has been a very active theme of research in distributed computing for at least a decade. In this paper, we start the study of subgraph detection from the perspective of local certification. Remember that a local certification is a distributed mechanism enabling the nodes of a network to check the correctness of the current configuration, thanks to small pieces of information called certificates. Our main question is: For a given graph $H$, what is the minimum certificate size that allows checking that the network does not contain $H$ as a (possibly induced) subgraph? We show a variety of lower and upper bounds, uncovering an interesting interplay between the optimal certificate size, the size of the forbidden subgraph, and the locality of the verification. Along the way we introduce several new technical tools, in particular what we call the \emph{layered map}, which is not specific to forbidden subgraphs and that we expect to be useful for certifying many other properties.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Global certification via perfect hashing

In this work, we provide an upper bound for global certification of graph homomorphism, a generalization of graph coloring. In certification, the nodes of a network should decide if the network satisfies a given property, thanks to small pieces of information called certificates. Here, there is only one global certificate which is shared by all the nodes, and the property we want to certify is the existence of a graph homomorphism to a given graph. For bipartiteness, a special case of graph homomorphism, Feuilloley and Hirvonen proved in~\cite{FeuilloleyH18} some upper and lower bounds on the size of the optimal certificate, and made the conjecture that their lower bound could be improved to match their upper bound. We prove that this conjecture is false: their lower bound was in fact optimal, and we prove it by providing the matching upper bound using a known result of perfect hashing.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2023

Local certification of local properties: tight bounds, trade-offs and new parameters

Local certification is a distributed mechanism enabling the nodes of a network to check the correctness of the current configuration, thanks to small pieces of information called certificates. For many classic global properties, like checking the acyclicity of the network, the optimal size of the certificates depends on the size of the network, $n$. In this paper, we focus on properties for which the size of the certificates does not depend on $n$ but on other parameters. We focus on three such important properties and prove tight bounds for all of them. Namely, we prove that the optimal certification size is: $\Theta(\log k)$ for $k$-colorability (and even exactly $\lceil \log k \rceil$ bits in the anonymous model while previous works had only proved a $2$-bit lower bound); $(1/2)\log t+o(\log t)$ for dominating sets at distance $t$ (an unexpected and tighter-than-usual bound) ; and $\Theta(\log \Delta)$ for perfect matching in graphs of maximum degree $\Delta$ (the first non-trivial bound parameterized by $\Delta$). We also prove some surprising upper bounds, for example, certifying the existence of a perfect matching in a planar graph can be done with only two bits. In addition, we explore various specific cases for these properties, in particular improving our understanding of the trade-off between locality of the verification and certificate size.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2023

When Should You Wait Before Updating? Toward a Robustness Refinement

Consider a dynamic network and a given distributed problem. At any point in time, there might exist several solutions that are equally good with respect to the problem specification, but that are different from an algorithmic perspective, because some could be easier to update than others when the network changes. In other words, one would prefer to have a solution that is more robust to topological changes in the network; and in this direction the best scenario would be that the solution remains correct despite the dynamic of the network. In~\cite{CasteigtsDPR20}, the authors introduced a very strong robustness criterion: they required that for any removal of edges that maintain the network connected, the solution remains valid. They focus on the maximal independent set problem, and their approach consists in characterizing the graphs in which there exists a robust solution (the existential problem), or even stronger, where any solution is robust (the universal problem). As the robustness criteria is very demanding, few graphs have a robust solution, and even fewer are such that all of their solutions are robust. In this paper, we ask the following question: \textit{Can we have robustness for a larger class of networks, if we bound the number $k$ of edge removals allowed}? (See the full paper for the full abstract.)

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Pattern detection in ordered graphs

A popular way to define or characterize graph classes is via forbidden subgraphs or forbidden minors. These characterizations play a key role in graph theory, but they rarely lead to efficient algorithms to recognize these classes. In contrast, many essential graph classes can be recognized efficiently thanks to characterizations of the following form: there must exist an ordering of the vertices such that some ordered pattern does not appear, where a pattern is basically an ordered subgraph. These pattern characterizations have been studied for decades, but there have been recent efforts to better understand them systematically. In this paper, we focus on a simple problem at the core of this topic: given an ordered graph of size $n$, how fast can we detect whether a fixed pattern of size $k$ is present? Following the literature on graph classes recognition, we first look for patterns that can be detected in linear time. We prove, among other results, that almost all patterns on three vertices (which capture many interesting classes, such as interval, chordal, split, bipartite, and comparability graphs) fall in this category. Then, in a finer-grained complexity perspective, we prove conditional lower bounds for this problem. In particular we show that for a large family of patterns on four vertices it is unlikely that subquadratic algorithm exist. Finally, we define a parameter for patterns, the merge-width, and prove that for patterns of merge-width $t$, one can solve the problem in $O(n^{ct})$ for some constant~$c$. As a corollary, we get that detecting outerplanar patterns and other classes of patterns can be done in time independent of the size of the pattern.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Lower bound for constant-size local certification

Given a network property or a data structure, a local certification is a labeling that allows to efficiently check that the property is satisfied, or that the structure is correct. The quality of a certification is measured by the size of its labels: the smaller, the better.This notion plays a central role in self-stabilization, because the size of the certification is a lower bound (and often an upper bound) on the memory needed for silent self-stabilizing construction of distributed data structures. From the point of view of distributed computing in general, it is also a measure of the locality of a property (e.g. properties of the network itself, such as planarity). When it comes to the size of the certification labels, one can identify three important regimes: the properties for which the optimal size is polynomial in the number of vertices of the graph, the ones that require only polylogarithmic size, and the ones that can be certified with a constant number of bits. The first two regimes are well studied, with several upper and lower bounds, specific techniques, and active research questions. On the other hand, the constant regime has never been really explored, at least on the lower bound side. The main contribution of this paper is the first non-trivial lower bound for this low regime. More precisely, we show that by using certification on just one bit (a binary certification), one cannot certify $k$-colorability for $k\geq 3$. To do so, we develop a new technique, based on the notion of score, and both local symmetry arguments and a global parity argument. We hope that this technique will be useful for establishing stronger results. We complement this result by a discussion of the implication of lower bounds for this constant-size regime, and with an upper bound for a related problem, illustrating that in some cases one can do better than the natural upper bound.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2022

Short and local transformations between ($\Delta+1$)-colorings

Recoloring a graph is about finding a sequence of proper colorings of this graph from an initial coloring $\sigma$ to a target coloring $\eta$. Adding the constraint that each pair of consecutive colorings must differ on exactly one vertex, one asks: Is there a sequence of colorings from $\sigma$ to $\eta$? If yes, how short can it be? In this paper, we focus on $(\Delta+1)$-colorings of graphs of maximum degree $\Delta$. Feghali, Johnson and Paulusma proved that, if both colorings are non-frozen (i.e. we can change the color of a least one vertex), then a quadratic recoloring sequence always exists. We improve their result by proving that there actually exists a linear transformation (assuming that $\Delta$ is a constant). In addition, we prove that the core of our algorithm can be performed locally. Informally, this means that after some preprocessing, the color changes that a given node has to perform only depend on the colors of the vertices in a constant size neighborhood. We make this precise by designing of an efficient recoloring algorithm in the LOCAL model of distributed computing.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2022

What can be certified compactly?

Local certification consists in assigning labels (called \emph{certificates}) to the nodes of a network to certify a property of the network or the correctness of a data structure distributed on the network. The verification of this certification must be local: a node typically sees only its neighbors in the network. The main measure of performance of a certification is the size of its certificates. In 2011, G\"o\"os and Suomela identified $\Theta(\log n)$ as a special certificate size: below this threshold little is possible, and several key properties do have certifications of this type. A certification with such small certificates is now called a \emph{compact local certification}, and it has become the gold standard of the area, similarly to polynomial time for centralized computing. A major question is then to understand which properties have $O(\log n)$ certificates, or in other words: what is the power of compact local certification? Recently, a series of papers have proved that several well-known network properties have compact local certifications: planarity, bounded-genus, etc. But one would like to have more general results, \emph{i.e.} meta-theorems. In the analogue setting of polynomial-time centralized algorithms, a very fruitful approach has been to prove that restricted types of problems can be solved in polynomial time in graphs with restricted structures. These problems are typically those that can be expressed in some logic, and the graph structures are whose with bounded width or depth parameters. We take a similar approach and prove the first meta-theorems for local certification. (See the abstract of the pdf for more details.)

cs.DC↗

arXiv2021

Classifying grounded intersection graphs via ordered forbidden patterns

It was noted already in the 90s that many classic graph classes, such as interval, chordal, and bipartite graphs, can be characterized by the existence of an ordering of the vertices avoiding some ordered subgraphs, called patterns. Very recently, all the classes corresponding to patterns on three vertices (including the ones mentioned above) have been listed, and proved to be efficiently recognizable. In contrast, very little is known about patterns on four vertices. One of the few graph classes characterized by a pattern on four vertices is the class of intersection graphs of rectangles that are said to be grounded on a line. This class appears naturally in the study of intersection graphs, and similar grounded classes have recently attracted a lot of attention. This paper contains three parts. First, we make a survey of grounded intersection graph classes, summarizing all the known inclusions between these various classes. Second, we show that the correspondence between a pattern on four vertices and grounded rectangle graphs is not an isolated phenomenon. We establish several other pattern characterizations for geometric classes, and show that the hierarchy of grounded intersection graph classes is tightly interleaved with the classes defined patterns on four vertices. We claim that forbidden patterns are a useful tool to classify grounded intersection graphs. Finally, we give an overview of the complexity of the recognition of classes defined by forbidden patterns on four vertices and list several interesting open problems.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2021

Local certification of MSO properties for bounded treedepth graphs

The graph model checking problem consists in testing whether an input graph satisfies a given logical formula. In this paper, we study this problem in a distributed setting, namely local certification. The goal is to assign labels to the nodes of a network to certify that some given property is satisfied, in such a way that the labels can be checked locally. We first investigate which properties can be locally certified with small certificates. Not surprisingly, this is almost never the case, except for not very expressive logic fragments. Following the steps of Courcelle-Grohe, we then look for meta-theorems explaining what happens when we parameterize the problem by some standard measures of how simple the graph classes are. In that direction, our main result states that any MSO formula can be locally certified on graphs with bounded treedepth with a logarithmic number of bits per node, which is the golden standard in certification.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2021

Distributed recoloring of interval and chordal graphs

One of the fundamental and most-studied algorithmic problems in distributed computing on networks is graph coloring, both in bounded-degree and in general graphs. Recently, the study of this problem has been extended in two directions. First, the problem of recoloring, that is computing an efficient transformation between two given colorings (instead of computing a new coloring), has been considered, both to model radio network updates, and as a useful subroutine for coloring. Second, as it appears that general graphs and bounded-degree graphs do not model real networks very well (with, respectively, pathological worst-case topologies and too strong assumptions), coloring has been studied in more specific graph classes. In this paper, we study the intersection of these two directions: distributed recoloring in two relevant graph classes, interval and chordal graphs.

cs.DC↗