arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Kushagra Chatterjee

Publications and source records attributed to Kushagra Chatterjee.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

A Configuration-LP Framework for Connected $k$-Median Clustering

We study the \emph{connected $k$-median} clustering problem, a clustering problem that augments the classical $k$-median objective with connectivity constraints. We focus on the \emph{overlapping} variant of the problem, where clusters are allowed to share vertices. In addition to a metric space $(V,d)$, the input contains a connected graph $G$ on the same vertex set $V$ of size $n$. The goal is to select at most $k$ centers $C$ and assign vertices to them so as to minimize the $k$-median cost (i.e., $\sum_{v\in V} d(v,C)$), subject to the constraint that each cluster induces a connected subgraph of $G$. Since the metric space and the connectivity graph are independent, the problem is significantly more challenging than standard clustering. Eube et al.~\cite{eube2025esa} showed that even the assignment version is $\Omega(\log n)$-hard to approximate and gave approximation algorithms with guarantees depending polynomially on $k$. We develop a configuration-LP-based framework that combines covering LP techniques with a rooted minimum-density oracle. For the assignment version, we obtain an $O(\log^2 n)$-approximation. For the general version, we develop a bicriteria framework that opens $O(k\log n)$ centers while achieving an $O(\log^2 n)$-approximation in cost. %Our results provide a different LP-based approach for handling connectivity constraints in clustering problems and demonstrate that configuration LPs, covering LPs, and rooted density oracles can be combined effectively to obtain approximation guarantees for clustering objectives under graph-theoretic constraints.

cs.DS

A Few Shared Random Bits Suffice for Constant-Round Almost Stable Matching

We show that almost stable matching can be solved in constant distributed rounds on general bipartite graphs $G=(V,E)$ using only a few shared random bits. Specifically, in the $\congest$ model, we compute a matching whose expected number of blocking pairs is at most $\varepsilon |E|$ in $O\left(\frac{\log(1/\varepsilon)}{\varepsilon^4}\right)$ rounds using $O\left(\log(1/\varepsilon)\right)$ shared random bits. Thus, for every constant $\varepsilon>0$, the round complexity is $O(1)$, independent of the number of vertices and the maximum degree. Previous algorithms achieve constant round complexity only for bounded-degree or almost-regular graphs; on general graphs, their round complexity depends polylogarithmically on $n$. Our main technical idea is a degree-guarded freezing rule that allows widely varying degrees to be handled by a single global charging argument, avoiding the $\Theta(\log n)$ successive degree thresholds used in previous work. The shared random bits are used only to select a common random output iteration. As consequences, we obtain an $O\left( \frac{\log(1/\varepsilon)}{\varepsilon^4} + \frac{\log n}{\varepsilon} \right)$-round $\congest$ algorithm without pre-shared randomness, via a low-diameter decomposition, and an $O\left(\frac{\log(1/\varepsilon)}{\varepsilon^4}\right)$-round algorithm in the fully-scalable Massively Parallel Computation ($\mpc$) model with linear total memory.

cs.DC

Creating Robust and Fair Graph Structures for Connectivity and Clustering

Graph algorithms are central to large-scale applications such as navigation systems, social networks, and data analysis platforms. This thesis studies two important challenges in such systems: robustness to failures and fairness in clustering outcomes. In the first part, we investigate fault-tolerant reachability preservers in directed graphs. We present the first non-trivial constructions of dual fault-tolerant pairwise reachability preservers that remain resilient to two edge or vertex failures, achieving a sparse construction of size $O(n^{4/3}|\mathcal{P}|^{1/3})$. In the second part, we study fair clustering algorithms that ensure balanced representation of protected groups. We develop approximation algorithms for fair consensus clustering and introduce the framework of closest fair clustering, establishing hardness results and efficient algorithms for multi-group settings. Building on this framework, we obtain improved guarantees for fair correlation clustering and design the first streaming algorithm for fair consensus clustering using only logarithmic memory. Together, these results contribute toward the design of graph algorithms that are both robust and socially responsible.

cs.DS

A Generic Framework for Fair Consensus Clustering in Streams

Consensus clustering seeks to combine multiple clusterings of the same dataset, potentially derived by considering various non-sensitive attributes by different agents in a multi-agent environment, into a single partitioning that best reflects the overall structure of the underlying dataset. Recent work by Chakraborty et al, introduced a fair variant under proportionate fairness and obtained a constant-factor approximation by naively selecting the best closest fair input clustering; however, their offline approach requires storing all input clusterings, which is prohibitively expensive for most large-scale applications. In this paper, we initiate the study of fair consensus clustering in the streaming model, where input clusterings arrive sequentially and memory is limited. We design the first constant-factor algorithm that processes the stream while storing only a logarithmic number of inputs. En route, we introduce a new generic algorithmic framework that integrates closest fair clustering with cluster fitting, yielding improved approximation guarantees not only in the streaming setting but also when revisited offline. Furthermore, the framework is fairness-agnostic: it applies to any fairness definition for which an approximately close fair clustering can be computed efficiently. Finally, we extend our methods to the more general k-median consensus clustering problem.

cs.LG

Generalizing Fair Clustering to Multiple Groups: Algorithms and Applications

Clustering is a fundamental task in machine learning and data analysis, but it frequently fails to provide fair representation for various marginalized communities defined by multiple protected attributes -- a shortcoming often caused by biases in the training data. As a result, there is a growing need to enhance the fairness of clustering outcomes, ideally by making minimal modifications, possibly as a post-processing step after conventional clustering. Recently, Chakraborty et al. [COLT'25] initiated the study of \emph{closest fair clustering}, though in a restricted scenario where data points belong to only two groups. In practice, however, data points are typically characterized by many groups, reflecting diverse protected attributes such as age, ethnicity, gender, etc. In this work, we generalize the study of the \emph{closest fair clustering} problem to settings with an arbitrary number (more than two) of groups. We begin by showing that the problem is NP-hard even when all groups are of equal size -- a stark contrast with the two-group case, for which an exact algorithm exists. Next, we propose near-linear time approximation algorithms that efficiently handle arbitrary-sized multiple groups, thereby answering an open question posed by Chakraborty et al. [COLT'25]. Leveraging our closest fair clustering algorithms, we further achieve improved approximation guarantees for the \emph{fair correlation clustering} problem, advancing the state-of-the-art results established by Ahmadian et al. [AISTATS'20] and Ahmadi et al. [2020]. Additionally, we are the first to provide approximation algorithms for the \emph{fair consensus clustering} problem involving multiple (more than two) groups, thus addressing another open direction highlighted by Chakraborty et al. [COLT'25].

cs.LG

Towards Fair Representation: Clustering and Consensus

Consensus clustering, a fundamental task in machine learning and data analysis, aims to aggregate multiple input clusterings of a dataset, potentially based on different non-sensitive attributes, into a single clustering that best represents the collective structure of the data. In this work, we study this fundamental problem through the lens of fair clustering, as introduced by Chierichetti et al. [NeurIPS'17], which incorporates the disparate impact doctrine to ensure proportional representation of each protected group in the dataset within every cluster. Our objective is to find a consensus clustering that is not only representative but also fair with respect to specific protected attributes. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to address this problem and provide a constant-factor approximation. As part of our investigation, we examine how to minimally modify an existing clustering to enforce fairness -- an essential postprocessing step in many clustering applications that require fair representation. We develop an optimal algorithm for datasets with equal group representation and near-linear time constant factor approximation algorithms for more general scenarios with different proportions of two group sizes. We complement our approximation result by showing that the problem is NP-hard for two unequal-sized groups. Given the fundamental nature of this problem, we believe our results on Closest Fair Clustering could have broader implications for other clustering problems, particularly those for which no prior approximation guarantees exist for their fair variants.

cs.LG

Online fair division with arbitrary entitlements

The division of goods in the online realm poses opportunities and challenges. While innovative mechanisms can be developed, uncertainty about the future may hinder effective solutions. This project aims to explore fair distribution models for goods among agents with arbitrary entitlements, specifically addressing food charity challenges in the real world. Building upon prior work in [AAGW15], which focuses on equal entitlements, our project seeks to better understand the proofs of the theorems mentioned in that paper, which currently only provide proof sketches. Our approach employs different proof techniques from those presented in [AAGW15]

cs.GT

Popular Edges with Critical Nodes

In the popular edge problem, the input is a bipartite graph $G = (A \cup B,E)$ where $A$ and $B$ denote a set of men and a set of women respectively, and each vertex in $A\cup B$ has a strict preference ordering over its neighbours. A matching $M$ in $G$ is said to be {\em popular} if there is no other matching $M'$ such that the number of vertices that prefer $M'$ to $M$ is more than the number of vertices that prefer $M$ to $M'$. The goal is to determine, whether a given edge $e$ belongs to some popular matching in $G$. A polynomial-time algorithm for this problem appears in \cite{CK18}. We consider the popular edge problem when some men or women are prioritized or critical. A matching that matches all the critical nodes is termed as a feasible matching. It follows from \cite{Kavitha14,Kavitha21,NNRS21,NN17} that, when $G$ admits a feasible matching, there always exists a matching that is popular among all feasible matchings. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for the popular edge problem in the presence of critical men or women. We also show that an analogous result does not hold in the many-to-one setting, which is known as the Hospital-Residents Problem in literature, even when there are no critical nodes.

cs.DS

Pairwise Reachability Oracles and Preservers under Failures

In this paper, we consider reachability oracles and reachability preservers for directed graphs/networks prone to edge/node failures. Let $G = (V, E)$ be a directed graph on $n$-nodes, and $P\subseteq V\times V$ be a set of vertex pairs in $G$. We present the first non-trivial constructions of single and dual fault-tolerant pairwise reachability oracle with constant query time. Furthermore, we provide extremal bounds for sparse fault-tolerant reachability preservers, resilient to two or more failures. Prior to this work, such oracles and reachability preservers were widely studied for the special scenario of single-source and all-pairs settings. However, for the scenario of arbitrary pairs, no prior (non-trivial) results were known for dual (or more) failures, except those implied from the single-source setting. One of the main questions is whether it is possible to beat the $O(n |P|)$ size bound (derived from the single-source setting) for reachability oracle and preserver for dual failures (or $O(2^k n|P|)$ bound for $k$ failures). We answer this question affirmatively.

cs.DS