arXiv subjects

Kemu Xu

Publications and source records attributed to Kemu Xu.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Welfare-Opaque Income: Taxation under AI-Agent Delegation

We study income taxation when an AI agent implements economically relevant choices through a rule hidden from the government. Alongside unobserved productive ability, this hidden preference-to-execution mapping creates \emph{double unobservability}: the same observable tax-base response can carry different welfare consequences. We call the resulting income \emph{welfare-opaque}. Our constructions show that tax-base statistics can coincide while reform welfare effects differ, even when mechanical welfare weights are identical. We derive an optimal-tax condition that adds a response-weighted execution wedge to the familiar sufficient statistics. A higher marginal rate gains a corrective benefit under local over-execution and an additional cost under local under-execution. Observing the wedge identifies the welfare effect of a marginal reform at the prevailing schedule; bounds on it deliver bounds on that effect. A controlled laboratory compares 4,500 model runs across five AI engines. Faithful delegation selects the score maximizer in essentially all runs. Conflicted objectives produce heterogeneous responses: Claude largely preserves the score maximizer, GLM moves predominantly downward, and GPT-mini and Qwen show concentrated lower-tail increases. Qwen also makes substantial downward adjustments. Different engines locate their departures at different points and in different directions of the designed distribution. Explicit scores align model rankings; formula-based objective instructions yield more uneven agreement. Qwen shows a clear positive tax-by-objective interaction, but its direction does not generalize across engines and the pooled sign depends on its inclusion. The analysis identifies execution information as a complement to conventional tax-base statistics.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

The Organization of Inference: Information, Resource Constraints, and AI Production

The economic value of inference depends on how capacity and task information are distributed across stages of AI production. We study these organizational margins using controlled workflow experiments on externally verified software-engineering tasks. In two matched resource panels, direct execution records the same success rate of 59.6 percent at logical-token ceilings of 12,000 and 24,000, while success under information-constrained planning rises from 36.2 to 51.2 percent. The planning disadvantage narrows by 15.0 percentage points (95 percent task-cluster bootstrap interval: 4.2 to 25.8). A strict read-only planning campaign varies whether the planner sees the task issue. At 12,000 tokens, issue access raises success by about 16 percentage points over issue-hidden planning. Compared with direct execution, task-informed planning is about 10 points lower at 12,000 tokens; at 24,000 tokens, it shows a 29.6-point advantage. In the resource panels, direct execution uses substantially less than either ceiling, while the planning workflow's binding rate falls from 46.2 to 0.8 percent and downstream execution accounts for 89.9 percent of the increase in total use. Scale determines the capacity available to a system; workflow and information structure shape the productive value

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

How Do Agent Harnesses Create Value? Planning Information and Release Control in Stateful LLM Agents

Agent harnesses supply planning guidance, organize execution, and check completion. We study how these components affect success, erroneous acceptance, and cost in two Retail experiments and an Airline pilot in $τ^2$-bench. The primary comparison pairs prewritten task-specific plans (Fixed) with shuffled policy text matched in word count (Sham), isolating the contribution of guidance content. Across 265 matched cells, Fixed improves oracle-verified success by 7.17 percentage points (90\% task-clustered bootstrap interval, 1.15--13.36 points), with gains concentrated in higher-complexity tasks. A read-only terminal verifier rejects 61\% of Retail oracle-invalid episodes while withholding 17\% of correct ones, at less than one cent of additional cost per episode. Which component matters more depends on the loss assigned to erroneous acceptance: at low liability the planning gain dominates; at high liability the verifier's avoided false passes dominate---and a standalone verifier captures nearly all the false-pass benefit of the full planning-plus-verification stack at a fraction of its cost.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

The Perceptual Cost of Passthrough: How Video See-Through HMDs Degrade Human Visual Perception of Acuity, Contrast, and Color

Video see-through (VST) technology aims to seamlessly blend the virtual and physical worlds by reconstructing reality through cameras. However, while manufacturers promise high perceptual fidelity, it remains unclear how closely recent commercial VST systems preserve basic visual functions across environmental conditions. In this work, we present an end-to-end perceptual benchmark for three popular VST headsets: Apple Vision Pro, Meta Quest 3, and Meta Quest Pro. Using adapted psychophysical measures, we evaluated participants' visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and color vision under both normal and low-light conditions, with naked-eye vision as the reference. Our results show measurable gaps between VST and naked-eye performance, especially for visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in low-light environments. By mapping these perceptual gaps across devices, visual functions, and lighting levels, this work provides a practical benchmark for current commercial VST capabilities and highlights where experience design or device optimization may need to compensate for perceptual loss.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Delegation Rights: Property, Agency, and Investment Incentives in the Age of AI Agents

AI agents increasingly operate inside digital accounts by exercising privileges that users already hold, raising a new control question: whether an existing account entitlement must be exercised manually or may be exercised through a user-authorized automated proxy. We define \emph{delegation rights} as the revocable, identity-preserving, scope-limited, and mode-specific authority of an account holder to authorize such proxy execution. We develop a three-party incomplete-contracts model with a User, an AI Agent provider, and a Platform. The contested object is not platform ownership, account transferability, data portability, or unrestricted API access, but residual control over the mode of account execution. Under Platform Control, the platform can protect infrastructure, identity systems, privacy boundaries, and third parties, but its discretionary veto weakens the User--Agent coalition's disagreement payoff and depresses relationship-specific investment. Under User Control, hold-up is reduced, but security, privacy, congestion, and third-party risks may remain insufficiently internalized. We then analyze \emph{Certified Delegation}, under which access protection is conditional on verifiable authorization, revocability, auditability, rate-limit compliance, data minimization, and risk mitigation. Certification is therefore not merely a technical safety screen; it is a conditional allocation of residual control. Illustrative mechanism simulations show how this regime can reduce deadweight loss by restoring delegation incentives while bounding residual risk.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Emergent Hierarchical Structure in Large Language Models: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Multi-Scale Representation

Why do language models from different architecture families respond so differently to the same perturbation? We argue that the answer is not scale, but \emph{how architecture shapes information compression}. Analyzing eight Transformer models (7B--70B parameters) from the Llama and Qwen families, we show that every model spontaneously develops discrete functional boundaries dividing its layers into Local, Intermediate, and Global processing segments -- yet boundary locations and per-segment brittleness are determined overwhelmingly by architecture family rather than model size or training configuration. We formalize this regularity as the \textbf{Multi-Scale Probabilistic Generation Theory} (MSPGT), which models an autoregressive Transformer as a Hierarchical Variational Information Bottleneck system and derives a tiered set of falsifiable predictions. Three predictions are strongly confirmed: all eight models exhibit two prominent phase-transition boundaries (P1.1); Llama boundary positions are stable across a $10{\times}$ parameter range ($\mathrm{CV}{=}0.067$--$0.095$) while Qwen positions vary widely ($\mathrm{CV}{=}0.465$--$0.726$), precisely matching our strong- and weak-dominance conditions; and cross-architecture local-segment brittleness spans \textbf{three orders of magnitude} ($493{\times}$ ratio) -- a gap that architecture family alone predicts and that dwarfs any within-family or scale-driven variation.

cs.CL↗