arXiv subjects

Kelly K. Horst

Publications and source records attributed to Kelly K. Horst.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

ORION-CMR: On-scanner Reporting with Integrated Foundation Model for End-to-End Cardiac MRI Analysis and Interpretation

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides comprehensive cardiac assessment but remains underutilized because of the complexity of acquisition, post-processing, and interpretation. Existing artificial intelligence (AI) methods address isolated tasks, limiting clinical integration. We present ORION-CMR (On-scanner Reporting with Integrated fOunda-tioN Model), the first clinically evaluated scanner-native end-to-end CMR foundation model. Pretrained on 12,896,733 CMR images from 9,258 studies, ORION-CMR performs sequence classification, ventricular function assessment, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) detection, binary and multiclass disease classification, and local large language model-based report generation in approximately 90 seconds. The framework. was evaluated on public benchmarks and clinically validated in a multi-vendor cohort of 68 subjects with normal examinations, congenital heart disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, and myocardial infarction. ORION-CMR outperformed supervised baselines and the previously published CMR foundation model (CMR-FM), achieving state-of-the-art performance for LGE classification and scar segmentation. Clinical evaluation achieved an AUC of 0.96 for normal-versus abnormal classification and 0.88 for multiclass disease classification, while generated reports demonstrated 81.4% agreement with expert interpretation. These results demonstrate the feasibility of real-time scanner-native AI-assisted CMR analysis and automated report generation.

eess.IV↗

arXiv2025

Closing the Performance Gap Between AI and Radiologists in Chest X-Ray Reporting

AI-assisted report generation offers the opportunity to reduce radiologists' workload stemming from expanded screening guidelines, complex cases and workforce shortages, while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. In addition to describing pathological findings in chest X-ray reports, interpreting lines and tubes (L&T) is demanding and repetitive for radiologists, especially with high patient volumes. We introduce MAIRA-X, a clinically evaluated multimodal AI model for longitudinal chest X-ray (CXR) report generation, that encompasses both clinical findings and L&T reporting. Developed using a large-scale, multi-site, longitudinal dataset of 3.1 million studies (comprising 6 million images from 806k patients) from Mayo Clinic, MAIRA-X was evaluated on three holdout datasets and the public MIMIC-CXR dataset, where it significantly improved AI-generated reports over the state of the art on lexical quality, clinical correctness, and L&T-related elements. A novel L&T-specific metrics framework was developed to assess accuracy in reporting attributes such as type, longitudinal change and placement. A first-of-its-kind retrospective user evaluation study was conducted with nine radiologists of varying experience, who blindly reviewed 600 studies from distinct subjects. The user study found comparable rates of critical errors (3.0% for original vs. 4.6% for AI-generated reports) and a similar rate of acceptable sentences (97.8% for original vs. 97.4% for AI-generated reports), marking a significant improvement over prior user studies with larger gaps and higher error rates. Our results suggest that MAIRA-X can effectively assist radiologists, particularly in high-volume clinical settings.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Data Scaling Laws for Radiology Foundation Models

Foundation vision encoders such as CLIP and DINOv2, trained on web-scale data, exhibit strong transfer performance across tasks and datasets. However, medical imaging foundation models remain constrained by smaller datasets, limiting our understanding of how data scale and pretraining paradigms affect performance in this setting. In this work, we systematically study continual pretraining of two vision encoders, MedImageInsight (MI2) and RAD-DINO representing the two major encoder paradigms CLIP and DINOv2, on up to 3.5M chest x-rays from a single institution, holding compute and evaluation protocols constant. We evaluate on classification (radiology findings, lines and tubes), segmentation (lines and tubes), and radiology report generation. While prior work has primarily focused on tasks related to radiology findings, we include lines and tubes tasks to counterbalance this bias and evaluate a model's ability to extract features that preserve continuity along elongated structures. Our experiments show that MI2 scales more effectively for finding-related tasks, while RAD-DINO is stronger on tube-related tasks. Surprisingly, continually pretraining MI2 with both reports and structured labels using UniCL improves performance, underscoring the value of structured supervision at scale. We further show that for some tasks, as few as 30k in-domain samples are sufficient to surpass open-weights foundation models. These results highlight the utility of center-specific continual pretraining, enabling medical institutions to derive significant performance gains by utilizing in-domain data.

cs.CV↗