arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Keita Yokoyama

Publications and source records attributed to Keita Yokoyama.

36 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Ramsey's theorem for pairs, collection, and proof size

We prove that any proof of a $\forall Σ^0_2$ sentence in the theory $\mathrm{WKL}_0 + \mathrm{RT}^2_2$ can be translated into a proof in $\mathrm{RCA}_0$ at the cost of a polynomial increase in size. In fact, the proof in $\mathrm{RCA}_0$ can be found by a polynomial-time algorithm. On the other hand, $\mathrm{RT}^2_2$ has non-elementary speedup over the weaker base theory $\mathrm{RCA}^*_0$ for proofs of $Σ_1$ sentences. We also show that for $n \ge 0$, proofs of $Π_{n+2}$ sentences in $\mathrm{B}Σ_{n+1}+\exp$ can be translated into proofs in $\mathrm{I}Σ_{n} + \exp$ at polynomial cost. Moreover, the $Π_{n+2}$-conservativity of $\mathrm{B}Σ_{n+1} + \exp$ over $\mathrm{I}Σ_{n} + \exp$ can be proved in $\mathrm{PV}$, a fragment of bounded arithmetic corresponding to polynomial-time computation. For $n \ge 1$, this answers a question of Clote, Hájek, and Paris.

math.LO↗

How strong is Ramsey's theorem if infinity can be weak?

We study the first-order consequences of Ramsey's Theorem for $k$-colourings of $n$-tuples, for fixed $n, k \ge 2$, over the relatively weak second-order arithmetic theory $\mathrm{RCA}^*_0$. Using the Chong-Mourad coding lemma, we show that in a model of $\mathrm{RCA}^*_0 + \neg \mathrm{I}Σ^0_1$, $\mathrm{RT}^n_k$ is equivalent to its own relativization to any proper $Σ^0_1$-definable cut, so its truth value remains unchanged in all extensions of the model with the same first-order universe. We give an axiomatization of the first-order consequences of $\mathrm{RCA}^*_0 + \mathrm{RT}^n_k$ for $n \ge 3$. We show that they form a non-finitely axiomatizable subtheory of PA whose $Π_3$ fragment is $\mathrm{B}Σ_1 + \exp$ and whose $Π_{\ell+3}$ fragment for $\ell \ge 1$ lies between $\mathrm{I}Σ_\ell \Rightarrow \mathrm{B}Σ_{\ell+1}$ and $\mathrm{B}Σ_{\ell+1}$. We also consider the first-order consequences of $\mathrm{RCA}^*_0 + \mathrm{RT}^2_k$. We show that they form a subtheory of $\mathrm{I}Σ_2$ whose $Π_3$ fragment is $\mathrm{B}Σ_1 + \exp$ and whose $Π_4$ fragment is strictly weaker than $\mathrm{B}Σ_2$ but not contained in $\mathrm{I}Σ_1$. Additionally, we consider a principle $Δ^0_2$-$\mathrm{RT}^2_2$, defined like $\mathrm{RT}^2_2$ but with both the $2$-colourings and the solutions allowed to be $Δ^0_2$-sets. We show that the behaviour of $Δ^0_2$-$\mathrm{RT}^2_2$ over $\mathrm{RCA}_0 + \mathrm{B}Σ^0_2$ is similar to that of $\mathrm{RT}^2_2$ over $\mathrm{RCA}^*_0$, and that $\mathrm{RCA}_0 + \mathrm{B}Σ^0_2 + Δ^0_2$-$\mathrm{RT}^2_2$ is $Π_4$- but not $Π_5$-conservative over $\mathrm{B}Σ_2$. However, the statement we use to witness lack of $Π_5$-conservativity is not provable in $\mathrm{RCA}_0 +\mathrm{RT}^2_2$.

math.LO↗

The reverse mathematics of theorems of Jordan and Lebesgue

The Jordan decomposition theorem states that every function $f \colon [0,1] \to \mathbb{R}$ of bounded variation can be written as the difference of two non-decreasing functions. Combining this fact with a result of Lebesgue, every function of bounded variation is differentiable almost everywhere in the sense of Lebesgue measure. We analyze the strength of these theorems in the setting of reverse mathematics. Over $\mathsf{RCA}_0$, a stronger version of Jordan's result where all functions are continuous is equivalent to $\mathsf{ACA}_0$, while the version stated is equivalent to $\mathsf{WKL}_0$. The result that every function on $[0,1]$ of bounded variation is almost everywhere differentiable is equivalent to $\mathsf{WWKL}_0$. To state this equivalence in a meaningful way, we develop a theory of Martin-Löf randomness over $\mathsf{RCA}_0$.

math.LO↗

Very weak fragments of weak Kőnig's lemma

It is well-known that any finite $Π^{0}_{1}$-class of $2^{\mathbb N}$ has a computable member. Then, how can we understand this in the context of reverse mathematics? In this note, we consider several very weak fragments of Kőnig's lemma to answer this qeustion.

math.LO↗

Leveraging an Efficient and Semantic Location Embedding to Seek New Ports of Bike Share Services

For short distance traveling in crowded urban areas, bike share services are becoming popular owing to the flexibility and convenience. To expand the service coverage, one of the key tasks is to seek new service ports, which requires to well understand the underlying features of the existing service ports. In this paper, we propose a new model, named for Efficient and Semantic Location Embedding (ESLE), which carries both geospatial and semantic information of the geo-locations. To generate ESLE, we first train a multi-label model with a deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) by feeding the static map-tile images and then extract location embedding vectors from the model. Compared to most recent relevant literature, ESLE is not only much cheaper in computation, but also easier to interpret via a systematic semantic analysis. Finally, we apply ESLE to seek new service ports for NTT DOCOMO's bike share services operated in Japan. The initial results demonstrate the effectiveness of ESLE, and provide a few insights that might be difficult to discover by using the conventional approaches.

cs.LG↗

Ekeland's variational principle in weak and strong systems of arithmetic

We analyze Ekeland's variational principle in the context of reverse mathematics. We find that that the full variational principle is equivalent to $Π^1_1$-${\sf CA}_0$, a strong theory of second-order arithmetic, while natural restrictions (e.g.~to compact spaces or continuous functions) yield statements equivalent to weak König's lemma (${\sf WKL}_0$) and to arithmetical comprehension (${\sf ACA}_0$). We also find that the localized version of Ekeland's variational principle is equivalent to $Π^1_1$-${\sf CA}_0$ even when restricting to continuous functions. This is a rare example of a statement about continuous functions having great logical strength.

math.LO↗

Combinatorial principles equivalent to weak induction

We consider two combinatorial principles, ${\sf{ERT}}$ and ${\sf{ECT}}$. Both are easily proved in ${\sf{RCA}}_0$ plus ${Σ^0_2}$ induction. We give two proofs of ${\sf{ERT}}$ in ${\sf{RCA}}_0$, using different methods to eliminate the use of ${Σ^0_2}$ induction. Working in the weakened base system ${\sf{RCA}}_0^*$, we prove that ${\sf{ERT}}$ is equivalent to ${Σ^0_1}$ induction and ${\sf{ECT}}$ is equivalent to ${Σ^0_2}$ induction. We conclude with a Weihrauch analysis of the principles, showing ${\sf{ERT}} {\equiv_{\rm W}} {\sf{LPO}}^* {<_{\rm W}}{\sf{TC}_{\mathbb N}}^* {\equiv_{\rm W}} {\sf{ECT}}$.

math.LO↗

Some upper bounds on ordinal-valued Ramsey numbers for colourings of pairs

We study Ramsey's theorem for pairs and two colours in the context of the theory of $α$-large sets introduced by Ketonen and Solovay. We prove that any $2$-colouring of pairs from an $ω^{300n}$-large set admits an $ω^n$-large homogeneous set. We explain how a formalized version of this bound gives a more direct proof, and a strengthening, of the recent result of Patey and Yokoyama [Adv. Math. 330 (2018), 1034--1070] stating that Ramsey's theorem for pairs and two colours is $\forallΣ^0_2$-conservative over the axiomatic theory $\mathsf{RCA}_0$ (recursive comprehension).

math.CO↗

Erdos-Moser and ISigma_2

The first-order part of the Ramsey's Theorem for pairs with an arbitrary number of colors is known to be precisely BSigma03. We compare this to the known division of Ramsey's Theorem for pairs into the weaker principles, EM (the Erdős-Moser principle) and ADS (the ascending-descending sequence principle): we show that the additional strength beyond ISigma02 is entirely due to the arbitrary color analog of ADS. Specifically, we show that ADS for an arbitrary number of colors implies BSigma03 while EM for an arbitrary number of colors is Pi11-conservative over ISigma02 and it does not imply ISigma02.

math.LO↗

The proof-theoretic strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs and two colors

Ramsey's theorem for $n$-tuples and $k$-colors ($\mathsf{RT}^n_k$) asserts that every k-coloring of $[\mathbb{N}]^n$ admits an infinite monochromatic subset. We study the proof-theoretic strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs and two colors, namely, the set of its $Π^0_1$ consequences, and show that $\mathsf{RT}^2_2$ is $Π^0_3$ conservative over $\mathsf{I}Σ^0_1$. This strengthens the proof of Chong, Slaman and Yang that $\mathsf{RT}^2_2$ does not imply $\mathsf{I}Σ^0_2$, and shows that $\mathsf{RT}^2_2$ is finitistically reducible, in the sense of Simpson's partial realization of Hilbert's Program. Moreover, we develop general tools to simplify the proofs of $Π^0_3$-conservation theorems.

math.LO↗

The strength of SCT soundness

In this paper we continue the study, from Frittaion, Steila and Yokoyama (2017), on size-change termination in the context of Reverse Mathematics. We analyze the soundness of the SCT method. In particular, we prove that the statement "any program which satisfies the combinatorial condition provided by the SCT criterion is terminating" is equivalent to $\mathrm{WO}(ω_3)$ over $\mathsf{RCA_0}$

math.LO↗

A generalization of Levin-Schnorr's theorem

In this paper, we will generalize the definition of partially random or complex reals, and then show the duality of random and complex, i.e., a generalized version of Levin-Schnorr's theorem. We also study randomness from the view point of arithmetic using the relativization to a complete $Π^0_1$-class.

math.LO↗

The strength of the SCT criterion

We undertake the study of size-change analysis in the context of Reverse Mathematics. In particular, we prove that the SCT criterion is equivalent to $Σ^0_2$-induction over RCA$_0$.

math.LO↗

Reverse Mathematical Bounds for the Termination Theorem

In 2004 Podelski and Rybalchenko expressed the termination of transition-based programs as a property of well-founded relations. The classical proof by Podelski and Rybalchenko requires Ramsey's Theorem for pairs which is a purely classical result, therefore extracting bounds from the original proof is non-trivial task. Our goal is to investigate the termination analysis from the point of view of Reverse Mathematics. By studying the strength of Podelski and Rybalchenko's Termination Theorem we can extract some information about termination bounds.

math.LO↗

On principles between $Σ_1$- and $Σ_2$-induction, and monotone enumerations

We show that many principles of first-order arithmetic, previously only known to lie strictly between $Σ_1$-induction and $Σ_2$-induction, are equivalent to the well-foundedness of $ω^ω$. Among these principles are the iteration of partial functions ($PΣ_1$) of Hájek and Paris, the bounded monotone enumerations principle (non-iterated, BME$_1$) by Chong, Slaman, and Yang, the relativized Paris-Harrington principle for pairs, and the totality of the relativized Ackermann-Péter function. With this we show that the well-foundedness of $ω^ω$ is a far more widespread than usually suspected. Further, we investigate the $k$-iterated version of the bounded monotone iterations principle (BME$_k$), and show that it is equivalent to the well-foundedness of the $k+1$-height $ω$-tower.

math.LO↗

Categorical characterizations of the natural numbers require primitive recursion

Simpson and the second author asked whether there exists a characterization of the natural numbers by a second-order sentence which is provably categorical in the theory RCA$^*_0$. We answer in the negative, showing that for any characterization of the natural numbers which is provably true in WKL$^*_0$, the categoricity theorem implies $Σ^0_1$ induction. On the other hand, we show that RCA$^*_0$ does make it possible to characterize the natural numbers categorically by means of a set of second-order sentences. We also show that a certain $Π^1_2$-conservative extension of RCA$^*_0$ admits a provably categorical single-sentence characterization of the naturals, but each such characterization has to be inconsistent with WKL$^*_0$+superexp.

math.LO↗

Propagation of partial randomness

Let f be a computable function from finite sequences of 0's and 1's to real numbers. We prove that strong f-randomness implies strong f-randomness relative to a PA-degree. We also prove: if X is strongly f-random and Turing reducible to Y where Y is Martin-L"of random relative to Z, then X is strongly f-random relative to Z. In addition, we prove analogous propagation results for other notions of partial randomness, including non-K-triviality and autocomplexity. We prove that f-randomness relative to a PA-degree implies strong f-randomness, hence f-randomness does not imply f-randomness relative to a PA-degree.

math.LO↗