Kang G. Shin | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Context-Aware Intelligent Vehicles

Intelligent vehicles increasingly support adaptive applications beyond driving themselves, ranging from context-aware ADAS and automated driving to in-cabin monitoring and fleet management, all under tight requirements on accuracy, latency, cost, and reliability. Meeting these requirements is challenging because vehicles operate in complex, uncertain, and rapidly changing environments while running on resource-constrained computing platforms. This paper argues that context-situational factors that give meaning to sensor signals and constrain decisions-should be treated as a first-class principle for next-generation vehicle systems, and operationalized as a unified, shared state for learning, risk assessment, and closed-loop control across the software stack. We systematically review state-of-the- art (SOTA) context-aware methods spanning (i) environment understanding, (ii) planning and control, (iii) safety and security, and (iv) connected vehicles. Based on a trend analysis of context-aware design, we identify four key technical challenges in building a general contextual engine for future intelligent vehicles: multi-modal context fusion, temporal context modeling, handling rare events, and collaborative context sharing. We hope this survey will motivate the development of robust and efficient context-aware vehicle applications.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Adversarial Calibration Attack on Autonomous Vehicles

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) rely on accurate camera-LiDAR calibration for multimodal sensor fusion. In practice, calibration can drift due to vibration, temperature variation, or minor sensor displacement, motivating online calibration algorithms that detect and correct misalignment at runtime while allowing the vehicle to continue operating without a factory visit. Existing AV attacks largely assume correct calibration. We instead identify online sensor calibration as a new attack plane. A corrupted calibration update can persist across subsequent fusion operations, causing system-wide errors that propagate from perception to planning and control. We present Adversarial Calibration Attack (ACA), the first physical attack against camera-LiDAR online calibration. Using a single adversarial poster, ACA first spoofs the miscalibration detector to trigger the calibration process and then steers the calibration estimator toward an incorrect transformation. A unified optimization jointly designs the poster's geometry and texture for both objectives. We evaluate ACA across benchmark datasets, simulation, and physical experiments. On benchmark datasets such as KITTI and nuScenes, ACA induces up to 33.9 degrees mean rotational calibration error, thereby severely degrading object detection. In the CARLA simulator, the attack causes a collision when the corrupted calibration is accepted in vulnerable scenarios crafted by the attacker. On a real Husky robot, a printed adversarial poster successfully reproduces the calibration error. These results demonstrate that online calibration is a practical and safety-critical attack surface for AVs.

cs.RO↗