arXiv subjects

Juliette Florin

Publications and source records attributed to Juliette Florin.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Impact of a CSS quantum error correction code in underwater quantum key distribution

Quantum key distribution (QKD) enables secure underwater communications essential for maritime infrastructure. Underwater optical channels introduce substantial photon loss (erasures) and ambient noise that degrade QKD performance. This paper investigates whether two four-qubit Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) quantum error correction codes (QECC) mitigate these impairments in vertical underwater communication BB84 QKD protocol. After developing a comprehensive stochastic channel model incorporating photon loss, geometric spreading, and solar noise, we assess the viability of QECC through the analytical study of the quantum bit error rate (QBER) and the secure key rate (SKR) with and without security depending on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) validated against Monte Carlo simulations. The standard four-qubit CSS code achieves a 3 dB SNR gain at the QBER 11% security threshold; the discard code variant achieves 4.5 dB. However, QECC includes an encoding overhead that reduces the SKR. We demonstrate a crucial relationship between the SKR and the probability of arrival of the sent photon. Analysis shows that QECC is beneficial exclusively in marginal SNR regimes; at high SNR, raw BB84 dominates. For an ocean Type III Jerlov water scenario with sunlight coming from the sun located at the top of the atmosphere, we identify operational depth-range windows where QECC enables communication otherwise infeasible. This analysis establishes that error correction deployment must be scenario-dependent: extend operational range at the cost of throughput when SNR is marginal, or prioritize key generation rates at high SNR.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

Comparative Analysis of Finite Difference and Finite Element Method for Audio Waveform Simulation

In many industries, including aerospace and defense, waveform analysis is commonly conducted to compute the resonance of physical objects, with the Finite Element Method (FEM) being the standard approach. The Finite Difference Method (FDM) is seldom used, and this preference is often stated without formal justification in the literature. In this work, the accuracy, feasibility, and time of simulation of FEM and FDM are compared by simulating the vibration of a guitar string. Python simulations for both methods are implemented, and their results are compared against analytical solutions and experimental data. Additionally, FDM is applied to analyze the sound of a cycling bell to assess its reliability compared to a real cycling bell. Final results show that both FEM and FDM yield similar error margins and accurately predict the system's behavior. Moreover, the errors from FEM and FDM follow the same periodicity with a phase shift when varying the assumed analytical tension and without a phase shift when changing the time interval. However, FEM converges faster with increasing mesh complexity, whereas FDM demonstrates quicker computational performance and achieves stable solutions even with bigger time intervals. Despite this FDM is limited to simpler configurations and often demands extensive mathematical formulation, which can become cumbersome for intricate shapes. For example, modeling a hemispherical object using FDM results in significant simulation times and big calculations. In conclusion, while FDM may offer faster convergence and computation time in certain cases, FEM remains the preferred method in industrial contexts due to its flexibility, scalability, and ease of implementation for complex geometries.

eess.AS↗