arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Jujian Zhang

Publications and source records attributed to Jujian Zhang.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

A bijective proof of a partition theorem of Berkovich and Uncu

In 2016, Berkovich and Uncu proved that, for all nonnegative integers $i$, $j$, and $n$, the number of strict partitions of $n$ with $i$ odd-indexed odd parts and $j$ even-indexed odd parts equals the number of strict partitions of $n$ with $i$ parts congruent to $1$ modulo $4$ and $j$ parts congruent to $3$ modulo $4$. Their proof used generating functions, and they asked for a combinatorial proof. We answer their question with an explicit bijection, assembled from three classical ingredients: $2$-modular diagrams, an insertion algorithm of Chen, Gao, Ji, and Li, and Glaisher's bijection. AxiomProver autonomously formalized and verified the proof of the main theorem in Lean.

math.CO

A problem of Andrews and Dhar on partitions

This paper is motivated by a broad question about AI-assisted mathematics: can an AI system help discover and certify an explicit bijection between two infinite sequences of complicated combinatorial sets already known to be equinumerous? The challenge is to find a reversible structure explaining that equality uniformly across the sequence. We give an affirmative test case in the setting of a partition problem. Andrews and Dhar introduced two partition families $\mathcal{C}_3(n)$ and $\mathcal{D}_3(n)$, and for "nonexceptional'' $n$, they asked for a bijective proof of their equality \[ |\mathcal{C}_3(n)|=\frac{|\mathcal{D}_3(n)|}{3}. \] We prove a residue-class equidistribution theorehm for $\mathcal{D}_3(n)$ that identifies a "canonical third'' subset $\mathcal{D}_3^{(0)}(n)\subseteq \mathcal{D}_3(n)$. Answering their question, we construct a bijection \[ \iota_n:\mathcal{C}_3(n)\longrightarrow \mathcal{D}_3^{(0)}(n) \] as a highly structured composition of four maps. AxiomProver autonomously produced and Lean-verified the equidistribution theorem. The bijection was found through human--AxiomProver collaboration, and the theorem was autoformalized and verified by the system.

math.CO

Reciprocals of Partition Polynomials

Ballantine--Beck--Feigon--Maurischat introduced the subsum polynomial \[ \operatorname{sp}(\lambda,x):=\prod_i (1+x^{\lambda_i}) \] attached to an integer partition $\lambda$, and studied rational functions obtained by summing reciprocals of these polynomials over natural classes of partitions. They posed ten conjectures which naturally divide into coprimality and divisibility questions, special-value and recurrence formulas, and coefficient-shape problems. We prove all of the conjectures in the first two families: the ordinary and binary coprimality/divisibility conjectures, and the odd and ternary special-value/recurrence conjectures. AxiomProver autonomously produced Lean/mathlib formalizations and machine-checkable proofs of these six conjectures, and also discovered a counterexample to the statement as printed; the corrected form remains open.

math.CO

Chebyshev quotients, Demazure multiplicities, and Dyck-path models

We study Chebyshev quotients that arise in the representation theory of Lie algebras, specifically within the theory of Demazure flags for fusion products of $\mathfrak{sl}_2[t]$-modules. Using a recent formula that expresses numerical Demazure multiplicities as coefficients of such quotients, we prove a general eventual non-negativity theorem for the same rational functions that compute these multiplicities: each quotient either terminates or has strictly positive coefficients for sufficiently large degrees, which we in turn interpret in terms of matchings and bounded walks. In several natural infinite families, these are unsigned bounded Dyck path models, giving both a structural explanation for the observed positivity phenomenon and concrete combinatorial models for key families of Demazure multiplicities. The theorems in this paper were autonomously produced and formalized in Lean/Mathlib by AxiomProver from natural-language statements.

math.RT

Formalizing $A_1^{(1)}$ Curve Neighborhoods in Lean 4

Combinatorial curve neighborhoods are somewhat foundational when setting up the quantum Schubert calculus for affine flag manifolds. In the specific case of type $A_1^{(1)}$, you can encode these neighborhoods entirely within the moment graph of the infinite dihedral group $D_\infty$. Building on the framework developed by Mihalcea and Norton, this paper presents a complete, axiom-free formalization of these combinatorial curve neighborhoods in Lean 4. Rather than just wrapping mathematical statements, we formalized $D_\infty$ directly as a Coxeter system to explicitly compute length functions and degree maps. Reachable sets are defined through edge chains bounded by specific degrees, and we ultimately characterize the curve neighborhood by the maximal vertices inside these sets. The core effort here lies in formally verifying the explicit combinatorial formulas for curve neighborhoods of arbitrary elements. Interestingly, by restricting our search space to finite sets, we also managed to extract a fully computable version of these neighborhoods.

math.CO

ABC implies that Ramanujan's tau function misses almost all primes

Lehmer conjectured that Ramanujan's tau-function never vanishes. In a related direction, a folklore conjecture asserts that infinitely many primes arise as absolute values of Ramanujan's tau-function. Recently, Xiong showed that these prime values form a subset of the primes with density at most $2/11$. Assuming the $abc$ Conjecture, we prove the stronger upper bound \[ S(X):=\#\{\ell\le X:\ \ell\ \text{prime and } |\tau(n)|=\ell \text{ for some } n\ge 1\} = O(X^{13/22}), \] which implies that Ramanujan's tau-function misses a density 1 subset of the primes. We give a heuristic suggesting that $S(X)$ should nevertheless be infinite, with predicted order of magnitude \[ S(X)\asymp \frac{C X^{\frac{1}{11}}}{(\log X)^2}. \] The main engine in this note was formalized and produced automatically in Lean/Mathlib by AxiomProver from a natural-language statement of the problem.

math.NT

On the paucity of lattice triangles

A rational triangle $T$ (one whose angles are rational multiples of $\pi$) unfolds to a translation surface ${X_T}$. The lattice triangle problem asks to classify those $T$ for which ${X_T}$ is a Veech (lattice) surface, which means that the $\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb R)$-orbit of ${X_T}$ is closed in its stratum (so its projection to moduli space is a Teichm\"uller curve). The most mysterious regime is the "hard obtuse window" (largest angle in $(\pi/2,2\pi/3]$), where it is conjectured that no lattice triangles exist. Using an arithmetic reformulation of the Mirzakhani-Wright rank obstruction, we prove a quantitative theorem that rules out all but a proportion $n^{-1+o(1)}$ of the triangles in this window with denominator $n$. The main technical result in our proof was autoformalized by AxiomProver in Lean (using mathlib).

math.DS

Almost all primes are partially regular

For odd primes $p$, we let $K_p:=\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_p)$ be the $p$th cyclotomic field and let $\omega$ denote its Teichmuller character. For $\alpha>1/2$, we say that an odd prime $p$ is partially regular if the eigenspaces of the $p$-Sylow subgroup of $\operatorname{Cl}(K_p)$ under the Galois action vanish for all characters $\omega^{p-2k}$ with \[ 2\le 2k \le \frac{\sqrt{p}}{(\log p)^{\alpha}}. \] Equivalently, $p\nmid \operatorname{num}(B_{2k})$ throughout this range. We prove that a density-one subset of primes is partially regular in this sense. By Leopoldt reflection, this yields a partial Vandiver Theorem: for a density-one set of primes $p$, the even eigenspaces $A_p(\omega^{2k})$ vanish for all even $2k$ satisfying the inequality above. This result has consequences for Kubota-Leopoldt $p$-adic $L$-functions, congruences between cusp forms and Eisenstein series, and $p$-torsion in algebraic $K$-groups. The theorem proving partial regularity for almost all $p$ is fully formalized in Lean/Mathlib and was produced automatically by AxiomProver from a natural-language statement of the conjecture.

math.NT

Dead ends in square-free digit walks

We study "dead ends" in square-free digit walks: square-free integers $N$ such that, in base $b$, every one-digit extension $bN+d$ is non-square-free. In base $10$, the stochastic independence model of Miller et al. suggests that infinite square-free walks occur with probability near $1$, corresponding to an asymptotic dead-end density of $\approx 5.218\times 10^{-5}$. We prove that the true asymptotic dead-end density satisfies \[ c_{\mathrm{dead}} \approx 1.317\times 10^{-9}, \] roughly a factor of $\sim 4\times 10^4$ smaller than the prediction. For every base $b\geq 2$, we prove that dead-end densities exist and are given by a closed-form expression (as a finite alternating sum of Euler products). The argument is fully formalized in Lean/Mathlib, and was produced automatically by AxiomProver from a natural-language statement of the problem.

math.CO

Fel's Conjecture on Syzygies of Numerical Semigroups

Let $S=\langle d_1,\dots,d_m\rangle$ be a numerical semigroup and $k[S]$ its semigroup ring. The Hilbert numerator of $k[S]$ determines normalized alternating syzygy power sums $K_p(S)$ encoding alternating power sums of syzygy degrees. Fel conjectured an explicit formula for $K_p(S)$, for all $p\ge 0$, in terms of the gap power sums $G_r(S)=\sum_{g\notin S} g^r$ and universal symmetric polynomials $T_n$ evaluated at the generator power sums $\sigma_k=\sum_i d_i^k$ (and $\delta_k=(\sigma_k-1)/2^k$). We prove Fel's conjecture via exponential generating functions and coefficient extraction, solating the universal identities for $T_n$ needed for the derivation. The argument is fully formalized in Lean/Mathlib, and was produced automatically by AxiomProver from a natural-language statement of the conjecture.

math.CO

Parity of $k$-differentials in genus zero and one

Here we completely determine the spin parity of $k$-differentials with prescribed zero and pole orders on Riemann surfaces of genus zero and one. This result was previously obtained conditionally by the first author and Quentin Gendron assuming the truth of a number-theoretic hypothesis Conjecture A.10. We prove this hypothesis by reformulating it in terms of Jacobi symbols, reducing the proof to a combinatorial identity and standard facts about Jacobi symbols. The proof was obtained by AxiomProver and the system formalized the proof of the combinatorial identity in Lean/Mathlib (see the Appendix).

math.NT

CombiBench: Benchmarking LLM Capability for Combinatorial Mathematics

Neurosymbolic approaches integrating large language models with formal reasoning have recently achieved human-level performance on mathematics competition problems in algebra, geometry and number theory. In comparison, combinatorics remains a challenging domain, characterized by a lack of appropriate benchmarks and theorem libraries. To address this gap, we introduce CombiBench, a comprehensive benchmark comprising 100 combinatorial problems, each formalized in Lean~4 and paired with its corresponding informal statement. The problem set covers a wide spectrum of difficulty levels, ranging from middle school to IMO and university level, and span over ten combinatorial topics. CombiBench is suitable for testing IMO solving capabilities since it includes all IMO combinatorial problems since 2000 (except IMO 2004 P3 as its statement contain an images). Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive and standardized evaluation framework, dubbed Fine-Eval (for $\textbf{F}$ill-in-the-blank $\textbf{in}$ L$\textbf{e}$an Evaluation), for formal mathematics. It accommodates not only proof-based problems but also, for the first time, the evaluation of fill-in-the-blank questions. Using Fine-Eval as the evaluation method and Kimina Lean Server as the backend, we benchmark several LLMs on CombiBench and observe that their capabilities for formally solving combinatorial problems remain limited. Among all models tested (none of which has been trained for this particular task), Kimina-Prover attains the best results, solving 7 problems (out of 100) under both ``with solution'' and ``without solution'' scenarios. We open source the benchmark dataset alongside with the code of the proposed evaluation method at https://github.com/MoonshotAI/CombiBench/.

cs.AI

A Formal Proof of the Irrationality of $\zeta(3)$ in Lean 4

We formalize a proof of the irrationality of $\zeta(3)$ in Lean 4, using Beukers' method. To support this, we extend the Lean mathematical library (Mathlib) by formalizing shifted Legendre polynomials and important results in analytic number theory that were previously missing. As part of the Lean 4 PrimeNumberTheoremAnd project, we also formalize the asymptotic behavior of the prime counting function, giving the first formal proof in Lean 4 of a version of the Prime Number Theorem with an error term which is stronger than what had previously been formalized. This result is a crucial ingredient in proving the irrationality of $\zeta(3)$. Our complete Lean 4 formalization is publicly available on GitHub.

math.NT