arXiv subjects

Joyce C. Mhlanga

Publications and source records attributed to Joyce C. Mhlanga.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Automated carotid artery atherosclerotic inflammation segmentation in PET using MSR-Net

Objective. To develop an automated method for segmentation and uptake quantification of carotid atherosclerotic inflammation on 64Cu-CANF-comb PET while accounting for partial-volume and tissue-fraction effects. Approach. Synthetic carotid PET images with known fractional-volume ground truth were generated by combining MR-derived high-resolution activity maps with GATE Monte Carlo simulation incorporating major PET physical processes and matched to the Biograph mMR acquisition and reconstruction. A two-stage network first localized the carotid vessel wall from T1-weighted MR and then estimated voxel-wise inflammation fraction from masked PET. Both stages used a multiscale residual (MSR) convolutional backbone. Performance was compared with U-Net, Transformer U-Net, DUCK-Net, and iterative Yang partial-volume correction. Main results. In a two-alternative forced-choice study, five nuclear-medicine physicians identified real images with 54% accuracy (54/100; Wilson 95% CI 0.44-0.63; exact binomial p = 0.48). On 184 simulated test slices from five held-out patients, the proposed method achieved a weighted DSC of 0.79, compared with 0.73 for U-Net, 0.69 for Transformer U-Net, and 0.75 for DUCK-Net, with corresponding HD values of 1.85, 2.29, 2.32, and 2.23 voxels. Patient-cluster bootstrap comparisons favored the proposed method for DSC and HD against all three baselines (Holm-corrected p <= 0.031). Overall ENRMSE was 0.24 versus 0.59, 0.68, and 0.59 for the three DL baselines and 0.57 for iterative Yang. In seven patients, corrected SUV showed a positive association with MR-derived lipid-rich/necrotic core with hemorrhage. Significance. The proposed framework improved carotid PET segmentation and uptake quantification under simulated conditions. The patient analysis is preliminary and requires external validation with biological reference standards before clinical deployment.

physics.med-ph↗

arXiv2023

Need for objective task-based evaluation of AI-based segmentation methods for quantitative PET

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods are showing substantial promise in segmenting oncologic positron emission tomography (PET) images. For clinical translation of these methods, assessing their performance on clinically relevant tasks is important. However, these methods are typically evaluated using metrics that may not correlate with the task performance. One such widely used metric is the Dice score, a figure of merit that measures the spatial overlap between the estimated segmentation and a reference standard (e.g., manual segmentation). In this work, we investigated whether evaluating AI-based segmentation methods using Dice scores yields a similar interpretation as evaluation on the clinical tasks of quantifying metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of primary tumor from PET images of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The investigation was conducted via a retrospective analysis with the ECOG-ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 multi-center clinical trial data. Specifically, we evaluated different structures of a commonly used AI-based segmentation method using both Dice scores and the accuracy in quantifying MTV/TLG. Our results show that evaluation using Dice scores can lead to findings that are inconsistent with evaluation using the task-based figure of merit. Thus, our study motivates the need for objective task-based evaluation of AI-based segmentation methods for quantitative PET.

physics.med-ph↗

arXiv2022

A Bayesian approach to tissue-fraction estimation for oncological PET segmentation

Tumor segmentation in oncological PET is challenging, a major reason being the partial-volume effects that arise due to low system resolution and finite voxel size. The latter results in tissue-fraction effects, i.e. voxels contain a mixture of tissue classes. Conventional segmentation methods are typically designed to assign each voxel in the image as belonging to a certain tissue class. Thus, these methods are inherently limited in modeling tissue-fraction effects. To address the challenge of accounting for partial-volume effects, and in particular, tissue-fraction effects, we propose a Bayesian approach to tissue-fraction estimation for oncological PET segmentation. Specifically, this Bayesian approach estimates the posterior mean of fractional volume that the tumor occupies within each voxel of the image. The proposed method, implemented using a deep-learning-based technique, was first evaluated using clinically realistic 2-D simulation studies with known ground truth, in the context of segmenting the primary tumor in PET images of patients with lung cancer. The evaluation studies demonstrated that the method accurately estimated the tumor-fraction areas and significantly outperformed widely used conventional PET segmentation methods, including a U-net-based method, on the task of segmenting the tumor. In addition, the proposed method was relatively insensitive to partial-volume effects and yielded reliable tumor segmentation for different clinical-scanner configurations. The method was then evaluated using clinical images of patients with stage IIB/III non-small cell lung cancer from ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 multi-center clinical trial. Here, the results showed that the proposed method significantly outperformed all other considered methods and yielded accurate tumor segmentation on patient images with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.82 (95 % CI: [0.78, 0.86]).

physics.med-ph↗

arXiv2022

No-gold-standard evaluation of quantitative imaging methods in the presence of correlated noise

Objective evaluation of quantitative imaging (QI) methods with patient data is highly desirable, but is hindered by the lack or unreliability of an available gold standard. To address this issue, techniques that can evaluate QI methods without access to a gold standard are being actively developed. These techniques assume that the true and measured values are linearly related by a slope, bias, and Gaussian-distributed noise term, where the noise between measurements made by different methods is independent of each other. However, this noise arises in the process of measuring the same quantitative value, and thus can be correlated. To address this limitation, we propose a no-gold-standard evaluation (NGSE) technique that models this correlated noise by a multi-variate Gaussian distribution parameterized by a covariance matrix. We derive a maximum-likelihood-based approach to estimate the parameters that describe the relationship between the true and measured values, without any knowledge of the true values. We then use the estimated slopes and diagonal elements of the covariance matrix to compute the noise-to-slope ratio (NSR) to rank the QI methods on the basis of precision. The proposed NGSE technique was evaluated with multiple numerical experiments. Our results showed that the technique reliably estimated the NSR values and yielded accurate rankings of the considered methods for ~ 83% of 160 trials. In particular, the technique correctly identified the most precise method for ~ 97% of the trials. Overall, this study demonstrates the efficacy of the NGSE technique to accurately rank different QI methods when the correlated noise is present, and without access to any knowledge of the ground truth. The results motivate further validation of this technique with realistic simulation studies and patient data.

physics.med-ph↗