Joseph Thekinen | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

REBOOT: From Failure to Recovery - A Dataset and Benchmark for Precision Assembly

Robot learning policies fail in characteristic ways: they stall in uncertain states, drift during contact-rich alignment, and miss targets by millimetres in precision tasks. Yet training datasets consist largely of successful demonstrations, while real-world benchmarks often reduce performance to binary success. This limits both supervision for recovery and analysis of where failures occur. We introduce REBOOT (Recovery Episode Benchmark for Off-nominal Trajectories), the first robot manipulation benchmark designed around failure as a first-class signal. REBOOT contains 2,160 demonstrations across 18 precision assembly tasks, each decomposed into five shared phases: Align(pick), Engage(pick), Transport, Align(place), and Engage(place), enabling phase-level evaluation beyond terminal success. Failures are introduced across phases and paired with expert recovery trajectories that return the system to a valid continuation state. Tasks are annotated with rotational symmetry, engagement-clearance precision tier, and assembly direction through matched install-remove pairs. Failure episodes are labeled by phase and categorical failure mode, enabling attribution to kinematic stage and tolerance violation. Data includes synchronized RGB-D observations from four viewpoints and grounded natural-language descriptions of phase-level success and failure conditions. Half the dataset contains expert demonstrations; the other half contains recovery demonstrations sampled to reflect failures observed in imitation-learned policy rollouts. We benchmark action-chunked transformer, diffusion, and $π_0$-FAST policies using phase-level completion rates, revealing model-specific failure points hidden by binary evaluation. Dataset and code: https://nanayawoa.github.io/REBOOT

cs.RO↗

arXiv2021

Toward Annotator Group Bias in Crowdsourcing

Crowdsourcing has emerged as a popular approach for collecting annotated data to train supervised machine learning models. However, annotator bias can lead to defective annotations. Though there are a few works investigating individual annotator bias, the group effects in annotators are largely overlooked. In this work, we reveal that annotators within the same demographic group tend to show consistent group bias in annotation tasks and thus we conduct an initial study on annotator group bias. We first empirically verify the existence of annotator group bias in various real-world crowdsourcing datasets. Then, we develop a novel probabilistic graphical framework GroupAnno to capture annotator group bias with a new extended Expectation Maximization (EM) training algorithm. We conduct experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our model in modeling annotator group bias in label aggregation and model learning over competitive baselines.

cs.HC↗