arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

José Rafael Rojano-Cáceres

Publications and source records attributed to José Rafael Rojano-Cáceres.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Understanding Accessibility Needs of Blind Authors on CMS-Based Websites

This paper addresses the limited attention given to blind users as content creators in Content Management Systems (CMS), a gap that remains under-explored in web accessibility research. For blind authors, effective interaction with CMS platforms requires more than technical compliance; it demands interfaces designed with semantic clarity, predictable navigation, and meaningful feedback for screen reader users. This study investigates the accessibility barriers blind users face when performing key tasks, such as page creation, menu editing, and image publishing, using CMS platforms. A two-fold evaluation was conducted using automated tools and manual usability testing with three blind and one sighted participant, complemented by expert analysis based on the Barrier Walkthrough method. Results showed that block-based interfaces were particularly challenging, often marked as accessible by automated tools but resulting in critical usability issues during manual evaluation. The use of a text-based editor, the integration of AI-generated image descriptions, and training aligned with screen reader workflows, significantly improved usability and autonomy. These findings underscore the limitations of automated assessments and highlight the importance of user-centered design practices. Enhancing CMS accessibility requires consistent navigation structures, reduced reliance on visual interaction patterns, and the integration of AI tools that support blind content authors throughout the content creation process.

cs.HC

Are UX evaluation methods truly accessible

Providing an equitable and inclusive user experience (UX) for people with disabilities (PWD) is a central goal of accessible design. In the specific case of Deaf users, whose hearing impairments impact language development and communication, it is essential to consider their specific needs during software evaluation processes. This study aimed to analyze a set of UX evaluation methods suggested in the literature as suitable for Deaf individuals, with the goal of validating their level of accessibility in real-world contexts. The research was based on a critical review and practical application of these methods, identifying their strengths and limitations in relation to the interaction, perception, and comprehension of Deaf users. Traditional evaluation instruments, commonly designed for hearing individuals, pose significant barriers when applied to Deaf users due to their re-liance on auditory and cognitive abilities, as well as the lack of consideration for commu-nicational accessibility. The results show that although these methods are frequently rec-ommended, they exhibit critical shortcomings that hinder the collection of accurate and representative data. It is concluded that it is essential to adapt UX evaluation methods to ensure genuinely accessible processes that address the communicative and cognitive needs of the Deaf community and accurately reflect their user experience.

cs.HC