arXiv subjects

Jordan Krywonos

Publications and source records attributed to Jordan Krywonos.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Constraints on the remote quadrupole field from the polarized Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect

The polarized Sunyaev Zel'dovich (pSZ) effect is a cosmic microwave background (CMB) polarization anisotropy induced by Thomson scattering from free-electrons in non-linear structure. The pSZ signal is determined by the distribution of ionized gas tracing the cosmic web and the CMB quadrupole at the location of free-electrons - the remote quadrupole field. Measuring the pSZ effect provides a consistency check of the optical depth to reionization and sheds light on the anomalous nature of the large-scale CMB temperature anisotropies, such as the low observed CMB temperature quadrupole. In this paper, we demonstrate that a CMB-CMB-galaxy bispectrum summarizes several existing pSZ statistics, and that in our observable Universe the ideal galaxy sample to detect pSZ is at $z \sim 1-2$. We evaluate the bispectrum using CMB data from Planck and ACT with galaxy density from the unWISE galaxy redshift catalog as well as Planck cosmic infrared background (CIB) maps. We do not make a statistically significant detection of the pSZ effect, which is consistent with the expected O$(1)$ signal-to-noise from this data combination. The measured amplitude of the pSZ bispectrum provides constraints on the optical depth bias associated with large-scale structure (the amplitude of the pSZ signal) of $b_q=1.02 \pm 2.64$, the optical depth to reionization of $\tau_{\rm rei} = -0.01 \pm 0.14$, and the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ of $\sigma_r \sim 150$ ($n_t = 0$) or $\sigma_r \sim 3$ ($n_t = -1$). We forecast that future measurements could tighten the constraints on these quantities by roughly a factor of 3, which is sufficient to provide independent confirmation of the low CMB quadrupole and the optical depth to reionization.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2026

Measuring cosmic bulk flow with kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich velocity reconstruction

Cosmic bulk flow--the volume-averaged peculiar velocity of matter--serves as a fundamental test of the Cosmological Principle when probed on gigaparsec (Gpc) scales. Historically, however, measurements of cosmic bulk flow have been limited to $R\lesssim 100\ h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$. We present an application of kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (kSZ) velocity reconstruction to constrain the bulk flow on cosmological scales, over a volume of effective radius $R\sim2000\ h^{-1} {\rm Mpc}$. We use the WISE$\times$SuperCOSMOS and unWISE galaxy catalogs, combined with CMB temperature maps from Planck to reconstruct large-scale velocities in six tomographic bins spanning $0.1\lesssim z \lesssim 1.5$. We place some of the tightest upper limits to date on bulk velocity at $200 \lesssim R\,[h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}]\lesssim 2000$, finding results fully consistent with the $\Lambda$CDM bulk flow expectation. Our unWISE constraints are in strong tension with the CatWISE quasar number-count dipole measurement if that dipole is due to a coherent bulk flow $\sim 370\ {\rm km\,s^{-1}}$ at $R\sim1000\ h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$. We also derive constraints on the matter power spectrum at low-$k$ ($k\lesssim10^{-3}\, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$) with low-$z$ ($z\sim 1$) galaxy samples. Alongside these cosmological constraints, we introduce a novel approach to map the optical depth bias--an inherent astrophysical degeneracy in kSZ velocity reconstruction--across different data combinations. Our work bridges the theoretical gap between bulk flow and kSZ-reconstructed velocities, and expands the horizon of bulk velocity measurements out to Gpc scales.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2025

Reconstruction of Dark Matter and Baryon Density From Galaxies: A Comparison of Linear, Halo Model and Machine Learning-Based Methods

For many analyses in cosmology it is necessary to reconstruct the likely distribution of unobserved fields, such as dark matter or non-luminous baryons, from observed luminous tracers. The dominant approach in cosmology has been to use the so-called halo model, which assumes radially symmetric profiles centered around luminous tracers such as galaxies. More recently, field-level machine learning methods have been proposed that can learn to estimate the unobserved field after being trained on simulations. However, it is unclear whether machine learning methods indeed significantly improve over linear methods or the halo model. In this paper we make a systematic comparison of different approaches to reconstruct dark matter and non-luminous baryons, from galaxy data using the CAMELS simulations. These simulations are in a $25\ \texttt{Mpc/h}$ box, allowing us to compare performance on the mildly non-linear scales $(k\sim 0.4\ \mathrm{h/Mpc})$ down to the size of individual halos. We find the best results using a combined GNN-CNN approach. We also provide a general analysis and visualization of the relationship of matter, non-luminous baryons, halos, and galaxies in these simulations to interpret our results.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2024

Reconstruction of Continuous Cosmological Fields from Discrete Tracers with Graph Neural Networks

We develop a hybrid GNN-CNN architecture for the reconstruction of 3-dimensional continuous cosmological matter fields from discrete point clouds, provided by observed galaxy catalogs. Using the CAMELS hydrodynamical cosmological simulations we demonstrate that the proposed architecture allows for an accurate reconstruction of both the dark matter and electron density given observed galaxies and their features. Our approach includes a learned grid assignment scheme that improves over the traditional cloud-in-cell method. Our method can improve cosmological analyses in situations where non-luminous (and thus unobservable) continuous fields need to be estimated from luminous (observable) discrete point cloud tracers.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2024

Constraints on cosmology beyond $\Lambda$CDM with kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich velocity reconstruction

Kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich velocity reconstruction uses the statistically anisotropic cross-correlation between cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropies and a galaxy survey to reconstruct the remotely observed CMB dipole. Using a reconstruction based on data from $\textit{Planck}$ and unWISE, we rule out non-linear Gpc-scale voids, provide the tightest constraint on the intrinsic dipole ($<14 \ {\rm km/s}$ at $68\%$ confidence), rule out matter-radiation isocurvature as an explanation of discrepancies between the measured CMB and galaxy number count dipoles, and constrain the amplitude of local-type primordial non-Gaussianity ($-220\lesssim f_{\rm NL}\lesssim 136$ at $68\%$ confidence) and compensated isocurvature ($-147\lesssim A_{\rm CIP} \lesssim 281$ at $68\%$ confidence). This representative set of constraints on beyond-$\Lambda$CDM scenarios demonstrates the breadth of fundamental science possible with measurements of secondary CMB anisotropies such as the kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2024

Improving Photometric Galaxy Clustering Constraints With Cross-Bin Correlations

Clustering studies in current photometric galaxy surveys focus solely on auto-correlations, neglecting cross-correlations between redshift bins. We evaluate the potential advantages and drawbacks of incorporating cross-bin correlations in Fisher forecasts for the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the forthcoming Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). Our analysis considers the impact of including redshift space distortions (RSD) and magnification in model predictions, as well as systematic uncertainties in photometric redshift distributions (photo-$z$). While auto-correlations alone suffer from a degeneracy between the amplitude of matter fluctuations ($\sigma_8$) and galaxy bias parameters, accounting for RSD and magnification in cross-correlations helps break this degeneracy - although more weakly than the degeneracy breaking expected from a combined analysis with other observables. Incorporating cross-bin correlations does not significantly increase sensitivity to photo-$z$ systematics, addressing previous concerns, and self-calibrates photo-$z$ systematics, reducing errors on photo-$z$ nuisance parameters. We suggest that the benefits of including cross-correlations in future photometric galaxy clustering analyses outweigh the risks, but caution that careful evaluation is necessary as more realistic pictures of surveys' precision and systematic error budgets develop.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2024

Cosmological measurements from the CMB and BAO are insensitive to the tail probability in the assumed likelihood

When fitting cosmological models to data, a Bayesian framework is commonly used, requiring assumptions on the form of the likelihood and model prior. In light of current tensions between different data, it is interesting to investigate the robustness of cosmological measurements to statistical assumptions about the likelihood distribution from which the data was drawn. We consider the impact of changes to the likelihood caused by uncertainties due to the finite number of mock catalogs used to estimate the covariance matrix, leading to the replacement of the standard Gaussian likelihood with a multivariate $t$-distribution. These changes to the likelihood have a negligible impact on recent cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing and baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements. We then extend our analysis to perform a sensitivity test on the Gaussian likelihoods typically adopted, considering how increasing the size of the tails of the likelihood (again using a $t$-distribution) affects cosmological inferences. For an open $\Lambda$CDM model constrained by BAO alone, we find that increasing the weight in the tails shifts and broadens the resulting posterior on the parameters, with a $\sim$0.2-0.4$\sigma$ effect on $\Omega_\Lambda$ and $\Omega_{\rm k}$. In contrast, the CMB temperature and polarization constraints in $\Lambda$CDM showed less than 0.03$\sigma$ changes in the parameters, except for $\{\tau$, ln($10^{10}A_{\rm s})$, $\sigma_8$, $S_8$, $\sigma_8\Omega_{\rm m}^{0.25}$, $z_{\rm re}$, $10^9A_{\rm s}e^{-2\tau}\}$ which shifted by around 0.1-0.2$\sigma$. If we use solely $\ell < 30$ data, the amplitude $A_{\rm s} e^{-2\tau}$ varies in the posterior mean by 0.7$\sigma$ and the error bars increase by 6%. We conclude, at least for current-generation CMB and BAO measurements, that uncertainties in the shape and tails of the likelihood do not contribute to current tensions.

astro-ph.CO↗