Jordan Eckert | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Skeletal Prototypes on Iterative Nerve Expansions

Prototype reduction replaces a training set with a smaller representation, and the established methods return a finite set of points. We propose Skeletal Prototypes on Iterative Nerve Expansions (SPINE). The model for each class is an embedded 1-complex rather than a point set. Its initial edge set is a class-conditional Mapper graph, so the data decide which localized clusters are joined. Later phases fit the vertices under a classification objective, and an observation is assigned to the class whose complex is nearest. The segments therefore enter the decision rule and not only the fitting. We evaluate SPINE on seventeen benchmark datasets under stratified 10-fold cross validation, against seven other prototype reduction methods at a matched budget. SPINE attains the highest mean accuracy and the best average rank. It is significantly better than five of the seven competitors under Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm correction. A budget sweep shows that the decision rule using the entire graph segments contribute most when prototypes are scarce, while the method as a whole competes best at moderate budgets. Construction cost places SPINE with the discriminative methods, and it is faster than generalized learning vector quantization on fourteen of the seventeen datasets.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Prototype Selection Using Topological Data Analysis

Prototype selection methods compress a training set, but the existing taxonomy of condensation, edition, hybrid, competence-based, optimization-based, and clustering-based families does not include methods that operate on the multi-scale topological structure of the data. This paper introduces two different persistence-based prototype selector variants, Topological Prototype Selector (TPS) and Boundary-Conscious Topological Prototype Selector (BoundaryTPS). TPS uses two sequential Rips filtrations to retain boundary-relevant and interior-typical points. BoundaryTPS is a single-stage variant whose vertex-weighted filtration concentrates retention near the decision boundary. We evaluate both methods against seven classical baselines on fifteen real datasets and find that the topological methods occupy a different operating point in the prototype-selection design space than existing methods. BoundaryTPS achieves the lowest mean Friedman rank on $H_1$ persistence-diagram preservation and is significantly better than five of the seven baselines (Nemenyi, $α= 0.05$). TPS ranks third on the same endpoint. Both methods are more stable under fold perturbation than any chained-decision selector tested, and both inherit the source set's class proportions without label-aware machinery. On aggregate G-Mean both methods are competitive but not leading, with rank-1 frequencies of $11.3\%$ (TPS) and $9.9\%$ (BoundaryTPS) across fold combinations. Empirically, both methods scale sub-quadratically in sample size.

stat.ML↗