Joo-Young Hwang | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

eBPF-Driven Adaptive Lifetime-Aware Data Placement for Shared FDP SSDs

NVMe Flexible Data Placement (FDP) reduces SSD write amplification by separating data with different lifetimes to minimize garbage collection (GC) copying. However, on shared servers, multiple tenants generate more lifetime classes than the available placement handles. Existing approaches rely on static mappings or application-specific knowledge, failing to capture runtime lifetimes and adapt to changing workloads. The challenge is to identify which data die together and determine which classes should be separated to maximize GC savings under a limited handle budget. We present eFDP, an eBPF-based system that automatically learns data lifetimes and manages FDP placement for unmodified applications on a stock Linux kernel. By tracking writes and invalidations, eFDP identifies lifetime classes and estimates the GC copying saved by separating them. It first assigns each tenant a handle, then allocates the remaining handles to the separations offering the greatest savings. It also re-plans placement when active tenants change. With four database tenants on an emulated FDP SSD, eFDP eliminates twice as much excess write amplification as tenant-level isolation and improves every writing tenant's throughput by 19-23%. On an enterprise FDP SSD, given RocksDB's levels, it matches a manually optimized placement using three handles instead of five. After a tenant switch, eFDP re-plans within seven minutes and maintains 25% lower write amplification than the original layout even after an hour.

cs.OS↗

arXiv2026

Bridging LLM Serving and CXL-SSDs with Chunk-Aware KV Cache Management

NAND-backed storage offers the capacity needed to scale LLM prefix caching, but its block I/O path incurs CPU cache contention and host-DRAM staging in addition to NAND latency. Our characterization shows that these interface costs persist even with DRAM as the storage medium, motivating CXL-SSDs for byte-addressable access to NAND-backed capacity. Surprisingly, however, a stock CXL-SSD remains about 3$\times$ slower than local DRAM and no faster than an NVMe SSD, while generic prefetching provides little benefit. We present LM-CXD, a CXL-SSD specialized for LLM prefix caching. LM-CXD bridges the semantic gap between the serving engine, which knows which KV chunks will be consumed, and the device, which controls their placement and movement. It makes KV chunks device-visible I/O units, exposes NAND-to-DRAM progress to the serving engine, and uses device DRAM as a GPU-accessible buffer. LM-CXD further coordinates request scheduling with windowed prefetching and pipelines layerwise KV movement with GPU computation to hide NAND latency under limited device DRAM. Across five LLM models, LM-CXD reduces average TTFT over a stock CXL-SSD by up to 2.6$\times$ with compute asynchronous prefetching and 4.03$\times$ with layerwise prefetching, achieving TTFT within 1.5$\times$ of local DRAM on average.

cs.AR↗