arXiv subjects

Jonathon Sendall

Publications and source records attributed to Jonathon Sendall.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The Metric Fossil: Emergent Spacetime from Asymmetric Projection

This paper develops a conditional framework for understanding the emergence of measurable physical structure from a pre-metric domain. Contemporary physics provides powerful and precise descriptions of relations among already-defined observables, yet offers comparatively little on the prior question of how observability, separability, and metric structure themselves arise. I propose that if three-dimensional spacetime is the result of an asymmetric projection from a non-orientable pre-geometric regime grounded in a minimal invariant, then a determinate and internally constrained set of consequences follows. These include: time reinterpreted as projection asymmetry rather than as a dimension or entropy gradient; matter as stabilised residue of projection rather than ontological primitive; quantum correlation as pre-separable unity dissolved by non-orientable topology; black holes as regimes of projection saturation rather than information sinks; dark matter as structured lag in the projection process rather than undetected particle species; and gravity as metric tension at sites of high projection density. The framework does not claim empirical confirmation. Its claim is that the proposal is internally coherent, structurally constrained, capable of generating non-trivial research directions, and that several phenomena currently treated as anomalous or paradoxical become expected consequences of the architecture rather than problems requiring additional postulates. An annex presents candidate formal objects and identifies research obligations for each consequence.

physics.hist-ph↗

arXiv2026

The Beta-Bound: Drift constraints for Gated Quantum Probabilities

Quantum mechanics provides extraordinarily accurate probabilistic predictions, yet the framework remains silent on what distinguishes quantum systems from definite measurement outcomes. This paper develops a measurement-theoretic framework for projective gating. The central object is the $\beta$-bound, an inequality that controls how much probability assignments can drift when gating and measurement fail to commute. For a density operator $\rho$, projector $F$, and effect $E$, with gate-passage probability $s = {\rm Tr}(\rho F)$ and commutator norm $\varepsilon = \|[F, E]\|$, the symmetric partial-gating drift satisfies $|\Delta p_F(E)| \leq 2 \sqrt{(1 - s)/s} \cdot \varepsilon$. The constant 2 is sharp. We introduce two diagnostic quantities: the coherence witness $W(\rho, F) = \|F \rho (I - F)\|_1$, measuring cross-boundary coherence, and the record fidelity gap $\Delta_T(\rho_F, R)$, measuring expectation-value change under symmetrisation. Three experimental vignettes demonstrate falsifiability: Hong--Ou--Mandel interferometry, atomic energy-basis dephasing, and decoherence-induced classicality. The framework is operational and interpretation-neutral, compatible with Everettian, Bohmian, QBist, and collapse approaches. It provides quantitative structure that any interpretation must accommodate, along with a template for experimental tests.

physics.hist-ph↗

arXiv2026

Interaction-Conditional Semantics and the Dissolution of Quantum Paradoxes

This paper argues that several canonical puzzles in quantum mechanics, including spin measurement, the double slit, entanglement correlations, and Wigner's friend, share a common origin in a semantic error and the illicit promotion of interaction conditional outcomes to intrinsic properties. I introduce four principles that license only configuration relative predication, grounding outcomes in physical measurement geometry while preserving objectivity. Applying these principles uniformly dissolves each puzzle without new physics or ad hoc interpretive machinery. Bell's theorem and the Kochen-Specker theorem are reframed not as dynamical mysteries but as constraints on permissible explanatory structure, evidence that intrinsic-outcome semantics is incompatible with empirical reality. The result is a relational objectivity that avoids both naive property realism and observer subjectivism.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

From Grounding to Stabilisation: Adequacy as a Criterion for Scientific Explanation

This paper develops a process-based account of scientific explanation that reconceives grounding in terms of stabilisation. Grounding theories capture hierarchical dependence but lack criteria for when explanations remain adequate under model updates, perturbations, and theory change. Stabilisation is formally defined by a schema $C \to P(I)$, where explanatory relations are sufficient when they preserve specified relational invariants under admissible transformations. This replaces the search for ultimate foundations with operational adequacy tests indexed to measurable invariance, resolving infinite regress worries while preserving a modest scientific realism. Applications show unifying power: theory change becomes an empirical question about structural continuity; quantum measurement becomes apparatus-dependent pattern selection; the effectiveness of mathematics reflects convergence on transformation-invariant descriptions; and emergence versus reduction reduces to stability of cross-level mappings. The black hole event horizon illustrates how ontologically identical states can diverge in admissible evolution, revealing process as explanatorily fundamental. Companion work develops apparatus-dependent adequacy protocols, including pointer-basis rotation and coupling-spectra methods, turning the framework into a falsifiable research programme across quantum, thermodynamic, and relativistic domains.

physics.hist-ph↗

arXiv2025

Event Horizons, Spacetime Geometry, and the Limits of Integrated Consciousness

What happens to a unified conscious field when its physical implementation straddles a black hole event horizon? This paper addresses that question for integration-based theories, including Integrated Information Theory, Global Workspace Theory, and Predictive Processing. These views share a structural commitment: unity requires a single strongly connected component (SCC) in an effective causal graph over a finite integration window $\tau$. Using the standard black hole causal structure, I show that no SCC can span an event horizon. Any theory that ties unity to strong connectivity must therefore accept that a single conscious field cannot remain numerically identical and unified across such a configuration. From the perspective of the theories themselves, the outcome is bifurcation: each causally connected subsystem continues to satisfy the very structural criteria the theory declared necessary for a unified field. On any such view, the number and boundaries of unified conscious fields are therefore fixed not by the substrate alone but by the conjunction of its internal architecture with the relativistic causal structure of the spacetime it occupies, a dependency that ordinary spacetime conceals by supplying it so abundantly, but which an event horizon abruptly withdraws.

physics.hist-ph↗