arXiv subjects

Johannes Betz

Publications and source records attributed to Johannes Betz.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

PlannerForge: LLM Agents for Scenario-Based Testing of Motion Planners in Autonomous Driving

Ensuring the safety of autonomous driving is a critical challenge. Scenario-based testing is a systematic process used to validate Autonomous Driving Systems (ADSs), but it remains a fragmented modular pipeline in which scenario generation, retrieval, modification, ADS execution, and results analysis are performed by separate tools with little interaction. Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown promise across ADS sub-systems such as perception, planning, and control. However, no prior work covers the whole scenario-based testing pipeline for ADSs with a unified LLM-agent framework. We present PlannerForge, an LLM-agent framework that extends all scenario-based testing stages (from Scenario Generation to ADS Assessment) and adds two further LLM-enhanced stages: ADS Enhancement and ADS Benchmarking. We evaluate PlannerForge with 10 off-the-shelf LLMs across all tasks (Generation, Selection, Modification, Module Routing, Planner Testing, and Enhancement) under 5 prompt conditions. Best-per-task scores range from 0.88 to 1.00, and open-source 20-35B backends match commercial APIs on most tasks. Open-source models such as Qwen3.6:35B match commercial APIs on three of the five tasks. Chaining the modules end-to-end retains 83% / 78% of seed queries (commercial / open). It outperforms Scenario Factory 2.0 (Finkeldei et al., 2025) on natural-language generation (193 vs. 144 executable of 200) and realises 92-96% of requested city, road and vehicle attributes. It outperforms BM25 (Robertson and Zaragoza, 2009) at rank 1 selection (92.0% vs. 67.5%) and From-Words-to-Collisions (Gao et al., 2025) on physically valid edits (>=94% vs. 31%). At N=400, cost-tuning lifts planner success from 50.4% to 70.2% and cuts collisions from 19.0% to 8.4%, without domain-specific fine-tuning.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Driving is a Game: Combining Planning and Prediction with Bayesian Iterative Best Response

Autonomous driving planning systems perform nearly perfectly in routine scenarios using lightweight, rule-based methods but still struggle in dense urban traffic, where lane changes and merges require anticipating and influencing other agents. Modern motion predictors offer highly accurate forecasts, yet their integration into planning is mostly rudimental: discarding unsafe plans. Similarly, end-to-end models offer a one-way integration that avoids the challenges of joint prediction and planning modeling under uncertainty. In contrast, game-theoretic formulations offer a principled alternative but have seen limited adoption in autonomous driving. We present Bayesian Iterative Best Response (BIBeR), a framework that unifies motion prediction and game-theoretic planning into a single interaction-aware process. BIBeR is the first to integrate a state-of-the-art predictor into an Iterative Best Response (IBR) loop, repeatedly refining the strategies of the ego vehicle and surrounding agents. This repeated best-response process approximates a Nash equilibrium, enabling bidirectional adaptation where the ego both reacts to and shapes the behavior of others. In addition, our proposed Bayesian confidence estimation quantifies prediction reliability and modulates update strength, more conservative under low confidence and more decisive under high confidence. BIBeR is compatible with modern predictors and planners, combining the transparency of structured planning with the flexibility of learned models. Experiments show that BIBeR achieves an 11% improvement over state-of-the-art planners on highly interactive interPlan lane-change scenarios, while also outperforming existing approaches on standard nuPlan benchmarks.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Accelerating Reinforcement Learning via MPC Solver-Gradient Guidance for Weights-varying MPC

In Model Predictive Control (MPC), cost-function weights shape closed-loop behavior, yet changing conditions often make fixed parametrizations suboptimal and motivate context-dependent online adaptation. Learning such policies is difficult because behavior depends implicitly on numerical MPC solutions, producing nonlinear, potentially nonsmooth, long-horizon dependencies on policy parameters. This creates a bias-variance tradeoff: Reinforcement Learning (RL) optimizes realized closed-loop return from environment samples but is sample-inefficient, whereas Gradient-Based Policy Learning (GB-PL) uses low-variance solver gradients from differentiable MPC to optimize surrogate losses on predicted trajectories but can be biased under model mismatch. We propose Solver-Gradient Guided Reinforcement Learning (SG-RL), a solver-sensitivity augmentation for RL-based online MPC cost-weight adaptation. SG-RL keeps sampled closed-loop return as the objective and uses bounded solver-derived gradients as auxiliary guidance to improve stability and sample efficiency. We instantiate SG-RL in Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) with four modular algorithms that inject solver-gradient guidance into actor-update scaling, policy loss, advantage estimation, and value-function learning. On two full-scale autonomous racing platforms with intentional model mismatch, SG-RL reaches PPO's best closed-loop return with up to 70.6% fewer samples, outperforms GB-PL baselines by at least 54% in closed-loop return, and generalizes zero-shot to unseen environments.

cs.RO↗