arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Jiaxin Mao

Publications and source records attributed to Jiaxin Mao.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Collaborative Search Meets Large Language Models: An Empirical Study

Collaborative search enables users to address complex information needs jointly. Advances in large language models (LLMs) enable autonomous agents to support collaborative information seeking within shared communication spaces. However, little is known about how these agents shape search experiences, behaviors, and outcomes compared with conventional search tools. We conduct a user study with 80 students working in 40 pairs. Each pair completes four collaborative search tasks under four scenarios: QAAgent, which answers queries using an LLM's parametric knowledge; CoSearchAgent, which uses multi-user conversational context to reformulate queries, retrieve web information, and generate source-grounded answers, while asking clarifying questions when needed; an in-chat search plugin that returns result lists; and manual Google Search. After each task, participants complete several questionnaires assessing their search experience and independently write a report; after all tasks, they participate in individual interviews. Results show that LLM-based agents reduce perceived workload, support collaboration, and reshape communication and evidence-use practices. They also encourage more independent paraphrasing, albeit at the cost of report richness. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic empirical comparison of LLM-based agents and conventional tools for collaborative search across search experience, user behavior, and collaborative outcomes.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

Directional Posterior Feedback Fusion for Query Reformulation in Dense Retrieval

Dense retrieval has become a fundamental paradigm for modern information retrieval, supporting efficient semantic search across a wide range of applications. Its effectiveness, however, relies critically on query embeddings that adequately capture users' information needs, which can be difficult for short, ambiguous, or underspecified queries. Feedback-based query reformulation approaches like pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) alleviate this by incorporating additional evidence from retrieved or generated content. However, existing embedding-space approaches commonly aggregate or interpolate feedback vectors, implicitly treating them as complete target representations. Such pointwise fusion can unnecessarily suppress query corrections along directions not expressed by individual feedback items, even when these directions are supported by complementary evidence. To address this limitation, we propose Directional Posterior Feedback Fusion (DIFF), a query reformulation framework that models feedback as directional evidence rather than target points. DIFF represents feedback as confidence-weighted directional evidence in the tangent space of the original query and jointly infers a controlled query update through prior-regularized posterior fusion, without retraining the underlying dense retriever. Experiments across multiple dense retrievers and different feedback sources show that DIFF achieves the best overall retrieval performance, demonstrating the effectiveness of explicitly modeling how feedback should constrain query updates.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

OpenSaC: A Python Library for Search as Code in Deep Research Agents

Deep research agents investigate complex questions through iterative search, source examination, and evidence synthesis. A conventional workflow alternates reasoning with individual search and reading actions. Search as Code introduces a new paradigm: agents write programs that compose search, source reading, reranking, model calls, and local processing, returning selected observations for further reasoning. To support this workflow in existing coding agents, we present OpenSaC, an open-source Python library with a companion Search as Code skill. Configurable capability interfaces let agents combine these operations while retaining evidence for inspection and reuse. Compared with standard Codex using its built-in web search, the OpenSaC configuration uses less execution time and fewer model tokens on BrowseComp and WideSearch, with higher accuracy on BrowseComp and slightly lower row F1 on WideSearch. We aim to lower the barrier to adopting Search as Code and provide an open foundation for community development and transparent research on deep research agents.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Video-Browser: Towards Open-web Agentic Video Browsing

Autonomous agents are shifting information seeking from passive retrieval toward proactive, open-ended research, yet this progress has largely bypassed video, one of the web's richest sources of evidence. We formalize Agentic Video Browsing, in which an agent must query video search engines, decide which returned videos to watch, and answer questions grounded in their visual content. To study this setting reproducibly, we introduce Video-BrowseComp, a benchmark and infrastructure suite with 660 human-annotated questions at three difficulty levels, paired online and offline evaluation tracks, and a fixed video search stack of roughly 12,000 videos spanning over 2,000 hours for evaluation and training-data construction. Our analysis reveals that the main bottleneck lies before video understanding: agents often fail to find the answer-bearing video at all. This bottleneck stems from two coupled challenges. Search engines index textual metadata such as titles and tags, whereas questions often target implicit visual or cross-source evidence absent from these surface forms; and exhaustively inspecting the many returned videos is prohibitively expensive. We propose Video-Browser, an evidence-surfacing agent that improves both sides of search. A Translation Memory helps the Planner phrase queries by analogy to past question-to-query transformations that successfully surfaced their target videos, and a Watcher performs sparse visual screening over returned candidates, retaining only videos that plausibly contain answer-bearing evidence for later dense verification. On the offline track, Video-Browser raises overall accuracy from 11.6% to 27.3% with Qwen3-VL-8B and from 39.8% to 45.1% with Gemini-3.1-Pro over the corresponding ReAct search agents, showing that better query formulation and post-search candidate selection improve end-to-end browsing performance.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Proof-of-Use: Mitigating Tool-Call Hacking in Deep Research Agents

While reinforcement learning (RL) enhances their ability to plan and reason across retrieval steps, we identify a critical failure mode in this setting: Tool-Call Hacking. Unlike execution-based tools (e.g., code or math), whose effects are directly observable, the weak observability of causal dependencies between retrieved evidence and reasoning under format- and outcome-level supervision enables agents to maximize surface-level reward signals without genuinely grounding their reasoning in the returned evidence. This leads to distinctive pathologies, including mode collapse via tool overuse and hallucinated tool usage where tool calls are largely decorative. To address this issue, we propose Proof-of-Use (PoU), an evidence grounded RL framework that explicitly optimizes the causal dependency from retrieval to reasoning and final answers. PoU re-fomulate a fine-grained stepwise interaction protocol in which agents must auditably cite normalized evidence identifiers. We operationalize this via a multi-objective reward design consisting of: (1) two progressive process rewards that constrain citation validity at intermediate steps; (2) a global Answer--Support Alignment reward that enforces consistency between final answers and retrieved evidence; and (3) a curriculum-style adaptive reward mixing mechanism that smoothly transitions agents from dense process supervision to sparse outcome-based objectives. Extensive experiments show the strong performance of PoU and demonstrate the effectiveness in mitigating tool-call hacking. Beyond this, PoU exhibits a notable emergent property: adaptive and robust tool-usage patterns naturally arise under domain and tool shifts, even though PoU does not explicitly optimize for tool adaptation.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Learning to Retrieve via Reinforcement Learning in Embedding Space

Dense retrieval models are typically trained with contrastive objectives that learn effective representations but do not directly optimize retrieval metrics or downstream task performance. To address this problem, we introduce RELER (REinforcement LEarning for Retrieval), a reinforcement learning framework that enables existing embedding models to learn to retrieve directly in embedding space and align to task-specific rewards. We train RELER by sampling unit-length query and document embedding actions from von Mises-Fisher (vMF) distributions centered on normalized encoder outputs, scoring the resulting retrieval or downstream outcomes as rewards, and updating the encoder with REINFORCE using a leave-one-out baseline (RLOO). As exploration in the high-dimensional embedding space is prone to sampling noise, we further propose conditional-mean projection (CMP), which projects each sampled embedding onto the low-dimensional subspace spanned by its encoder output and the candidate embeddings it is compared against, reducing noise in the policy gradient while preserving its expectation. We evaluate RELER on BRIGHT, a benchmark with reasoning-intensive queries that remain challenging for existing embedding models. RELER consistently outperforms InfoNCE and LambdaLoss in average nDCG@10 when post-training BGE-M3 and Qwen3-Embedding backbones. We further evaluate downstream utility through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), where we adapt only the query encoder while keeping the document index and generator fixed. Across seven QA datasets, jointly optimizing retrieval and answer rewards improves both average retrieval performance and answer quality in RAG.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

RankBuffer: Efficient Ranking-Based Rewards for Open-Ended Generation

Open-ended generation lacks canonical answers, making pointwise rewards difficult to calibrate for group-based reinforcement learning. Directly ranking same-query rollouts provides a more suitable relative reward signal, but existing ranking-based reward methods can incur substantial judging cost. We introduce RankBuffer, which maintains an ordered, query-specific buffer of previously judged responses as a reusable quality scale. Each rollout is first inserted into an anchor interval through an independent coarse judgment, after which only rollouts assigned to the same interval undergo local fine ranking. The resulting complete order is converted into bounded rank rewards, while boundary expansion, local refinement, and inactive-anchor pruning adapt the buffer as the policy evolves. Across four open-ended benchmarks, RankBuffer consistently outperforms all pointwise baselines. It also achieves nearly on-par performance with the strongest ranking-based reward baseline while substantially reducing judging cost. Ablations demonstrate the importance of both local fine ranking and anchor response content, while buffer analyses show that rollout-derived anchors progressively extend and refine the covered quality scale. These results establish response reuse as an effective approach to efficient relative reward construction.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

DuMateBench: Evaluating Autonomous Agents in Complex Real-World Workflows

Autonomous agents are increasingly adopted to complete complex, multi-tool workflows in real-world settings. However, existing benchmarks typically separate tasks by application or capability and evaluate agents in environments that are cleaner and more stable than those encountered in practice. We introduce DuMateBench, a real-session benchmark reconstructed from anonymized and privacy-screened user sessions collected from a large-scale production agent platform. Each task preserves the relevant pre-solution interaction history, persistent configurations, and workspace state, and is then validated through human verification. The resulting benchmark comprises 200 tasks spanning 8 broad scenarios and 17 fine-grained capability categories, with most tasks requiring multiple capability coordination. We execute these tasks in isolated Docker containers injected with three forms of real-world environmental complexity: Insufficient, Unstable, and Noisy, and assess performance using a hybrid deterministic and LLM-as-Judge evaluation protocol. Experiments across five representative autonomous-agent frameworks paired with four state-of-the-art LLMs reveal substantial gaps in strict task completion. Complementary robustness, efficiency, and diagnostic analyses further show that performance under environmental perturbations is jointly shaped by the capabilities of the LLM and the surrounding agent framework. The code and data are publicly available at https://dumatebench.com/.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

E2Rank: Unifying Text Embedding and Listwise Reranking for Effective and Efficient Search

Text embedding models deliver competitive retrieval performance with high efficiency, but their ranking fidelity remains limited compared to LLM-based listwise rerankers, which capture fine-grained query-document and document-document interactions at high computational cost. We propose E2Rank (Efficient Embedding-based Ranking), a unified framework that extends a single text embedding model to perform both retrieval and listwise reranking via continued training under a listwise ranking objective. The key insight is to treat the listwise prompt---constructed from the query and its top-K candidates---as a pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) query, enabling reranking via cosine similarity against precomputed document embeddings without autoregressive decoding. Empirically, E2Rank achieves state-of-the-art results on BEIR, competitive performance on the reasoning-intensive BRIGHT benchmark, significantly lower latency than existing LLM-based rerankers, and improved embedding performance on MTEB---all within a single model.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Tournament-GRPO: Group-Wise Tournament Rewards for Reinforcement Learning in Open-Ended Long-Form Generation

Reinforcement learning in open-ended long-form generation is challenging because reliable reference answers and automatic metrics are often unavailable. Existing rubric-based methods typically rely on pointwise LLM-as-a-judge scoring, but absolute scores are difficult to calibrate across complex responses, may provide weak discrimination among same-query rollouts, and can become saturated during optimization. We propose Tournament-GRPO, a group-wise reward framework that converts rubric-guided LLM judgments into relative rewards through repeated multi-round tournaments among same-query rollouts. Tournament-GRPO compares candidates within groups, accumulates tournament outcomes, and normalizes them into group-wise rewards for GRPO training. Experiments on Deep Research Bench show that Tournament-GRPO consistently outperforms existing reward-design baselines, achieving a 4.52-point overall-score improvement over the strongest baseline. Further analyses show that tournament rewards provide a favorable effectiveness--efficiency trade-off and that tournament design affects training dynamics. These results suggest that rubric-guided tournament comparison provides an effective reward signal for reinforcement learning in open-ended long-form generation.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

SearchArt: Training Long-Horizon Search Agent with Scalable Synthetic and Verified Task

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled search agents to autonomously tackle complex tasks across extended search and reasoning horizons. However, training effective search agents remains challenging due to the lack of scalable and long-horizon tasks, and the difficulty of evaluating and correcting intermediate reasoning and tool-use behaviors. We introduce SearchArt, a scalable framework for training long-horizon search agents through verification-driven task synthesis and a multi-stage post-training pipeline. SearchArt constructs large-scale datasets for complex search-, research- and user-oriented tasks by synthesizing diverse information-seeking QA pairs and corresponding search trajectories from web documents and automatically generated evidence graphs. To ensure the reliability of the synthesized data, we design a verification pipeline that jointly evaluates QA consistency, trajectory quality, and the relevance of retrieved evidence. The verified trajectories are subsequently used in a multi-stage training process comprising supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning-based policy optimization. Search agents trained with SearchArt exhibit adaptive search planning, iterative evidence aggregation, and complex reasoning over extended interaction horizons. Experimental results demonstrate that, with only (Qwen3.5-) 27B parameters, SearchArt scores 74.39 on BrowseComp-ZH, 70.06 on BrowseComp, and 52.55 on Deepresearch-bench, matching or surpassing frontier closed-source agents on both deepsearch and deepresearch benchmarks.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

Diagnosing Search Behavior and Failure Modes in Long-Horizon Search Agents

Deep search agents answer difficult information-seeking questions by iteratively issuing search queries to gather supporting evidence, but it remains unclear whether and how greater search effort leads to better answers. We study these questions through a trajectory-level diagnosis of long-horizon search agents. Using human-annotated document-level relevance judgments, we evaluate the evidence retrieved at each search step and separate two stages of agent behavior: what evidence an agent retrieves and how effectively it uses that evidence. This distinction further allows us to decompose failures into retrieval gaps, where the necessary evidence is never found, and utilization gaps, where relevant evidence is retrieved but not used correctly. With the retrieval model and evaluation harness held fixed, we compare six agents on BrowseComp-Plus and further validate our findings on BrowseComp with an open-web search API. Across settings, we find that search effort and answer quality are only weakly aligned. Answer accuracy is better correlated with the quality of retrieved evidence, especially cumulative retrieval recall, than with the number of searches or the amount of context consumed. Useful evidence often appears early in the trajectory, yet agents tend to continue searching, producing a long tail of low-yield retrieval steps. At the query level, exploratory reformulations remain useful, but the best-performing agents issue far fewer redundant queries. Overall, by systematically characterizing the search behavior and failure modes of long-horizon search agents, this work points to practical directions for building better deep research systems, including stronger query formulation, more effective evidence selection and context management, and stopping criteria based on whether sufficient supporting evidence has been retrieved.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Fetch-then-Explore: Decoupling Selection from Extraction over a Persistent Workspace for Search Agents

Search agents now answer questions that take dozens of searches to settle, yet how such an agent reads a page has drawn far less attention than how it finds one. Nearly all of them use one of two document interfaces, and both tie a page to the moment it is opened. \emph{Visit-and-read} injects a reading of the page into the message history at fetch time, fixing that reading before the agent knows which fact it will need. Stateful \emph{browsing} instead extracts on demand from the page in hand, but holds one page at a time and releases it as soon as the agent opens another. Either way, a page that turns out to matter many turns later has to be fetched and rendered into context all over again. We propose \textbf{Fetch-then-Explore}, which separates page selection from evidence extraction and keeps what it selects: pages are recorded in a per-question workspace on the filesystem rather than the context window or a transient session, and evidence is pulled from them on demand later. Selection becomes almost free, extraction can wait until the agent knows what to look for and be repeated as its hypothesis sharpens, and pages are not released when the agent moves on, so evidence accumulates across the trajectory. In a unified ReAct harness with fixed search, we compare Fetch-then-Explore against snippet-only, visit-and-read, and browsing baselines on two open-web benchmarks, BrowseComp and WideSearch, across three agent backbones. It leads BrowseComp accuracy at every backbone and generally matches or exceeds the baselines on WideSearch, and a behavioral analysis traces the gains to the workspace's defining move: returning to a page after leaving it, which it does far more than any transient interface, so evidence missed on a first pass can still be recovered later.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

RWGBench: Evaluating Scholarly Positioning in Related Work Generation

Large language models have shown strong fluency in scientific writing, yet the evaluation of related work generation (RWG) remains limited. Existing RWG evaluations largely inherit summarization-oriented metrics, using lexical or semantic similarity to reference sections as proxies for quality. However, related work writing is fundamentally a citation-level scholarly positioning task: it requires selecting, organizing, and framing prior work to clarify how a target paper relates to, differs from, and contributes beyond existing research.As a result, models may generate coherent and semantically-relevant text while exhibiting academically critical failures, such as inappropriate citation selection or misplaced references, that conventional metrics do not capture.To this end, we introduce \textbf{RWGBench}, a benchmark that evaluates RWG from the perspective of citation decision-making rather than text similarity. RWGBench is constructed from a large-scale collection of 40,108 computer science papers and a retrieval corpus of 1.09 million documents, with a carefully curated test set comprising 100 papers and their corresponding published related work sections.We propose a multi-dimensional evaluation framework that assesses citation selection, contextual appropriateness, organization, and discourse structure.Experiments reveal systematic limitations in current systems that are obscured by standard evaluations, while Oracle studies further disentangle retrieval-level and generation-level bottlenecks. Human evaluation further shows that our citation-centric metrics align substantially better with expert judgment than surface-level text metrics. RWGBench offers a citation-centric testbed for developing and evaluating related work generation systems that are better aligned with scholarly writing practices.

cs.DL↗
arXiv2026

UnityMAS-O: A General RL Optimization Framework for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems

LLM-based multi-agent systems decompose complex tasks into interacting roles, but most remain manually orchestrated by prompts, tools, and control rules, while agents are rarely optimized through a unified reinforcement learning interface. Existing RL post-training frameworks mainly target single-policy optimization and lack abstractions for user-defined multi-agent workflows, structured interaction, role-specific credit assignment, and configurable parameter sharing. We present UnityMAS-O, a general RL optimization framework for LLM-based multi-agent systems. UnityMAS-O treats the complete workflow as the optimization unit, rather than a single response or policy trajectory. It represents workflows through four first-class objects: logical agent roles, graph trajectories, user-defined rewards, and agent--model mappings. This decouples logical agents from physical model parameters, supporting full sharing, full separation, and partial sharing, with rewards assigned at role, turn, and trajectory levels. UnityMAS-O extends verl with a Ray-based star-topology runtime. A central controller executes workflows, invokes tools, records structured trajectories, and assembles rewards; model-local worker groups handle rollout, buffering, advantage computation, and distributed PPO-style updates. Users can define agents, workflows, model mappings, and rewards without rewriting the optimization infrastructure. We instantiate UnityMAS-O on retrieval-augmented QA, iterative agentic search, and reflective code generation. Across Natural Questions, HotpotQA, and held-out code tasks, multi-agent RL improves manually specified workflows after optimization, with especially large gains for smaller models and strict code all-passed metrics. These results show that UnityMAS-O can serve as a reusable substrate for converting diverse LLM-based multi-agent workflows into trainable multi-agent RL systems.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

OASES: Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Co-Training for Agentic Search

Agentic search enables language models to solve knowledge-intensive tasks by adaptively acquiring external evidence over multiple steps. Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a widely adopted training paradigm for search agents, yet outcome-only rewards are sparse and provide limited credit assignment for intermediate search actions. Existing process-reward methods therefore seek to densify supervision through proxy signals, external evaluators, or likelihood-based information gain. However, proxy rewards can deviate from the final outcome objective, while fixed evaluators can become stale as the search policy evolves, leading to unreliable process supervision. To address these challenges, we propose OASES, an Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Supervision framework for agentic search. OASES derives outcome-aligned process rewards by evaluating how well each intermediate search state supports answering the original question. It further co-trains the search policy and the state evaluator on policy, allowing the evaluator to adapt to evolving search behavior and provide more reliable process rewards. Experiments on five multi-hop QA benchmarks show that OASES consistently outperforms strong RL baselines, with further analyses confirming the benefits of outcome-aligned process rewards and search-evaluation co-training.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has quickly grown into a pivotal paradigm in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs). Although existing research mainly emphasizes accuracy and efficiency, the trustworthiness of RAG systems remains insufficiently explored. RAG can improve LLM reliability by grounding responses in external and up-to-date knowledge, reducing hallucinations. However, unreliable retrieval or improper knowledge utilization may still lead to undesirable outputs. To address these concerns, we propose a unified framework, Trust-RAG Compass, that assesses the trustworthiness of RAG systems across six key dimensions: factuality, robustness, fairness, transparency, accountability, and privacy. Within this framework, we provide a thorough review of the existing literature along each dimension. Furthermore, we introduce an evaluation benchmark, TRC Bench (\underline{T}rust-\underline{R}AG \underline{C}ompass \underline{Bench}mark), regarding the six dimensions and conduct comprehensive evaluations for a variety of proprietary and open-source models. Our results shed light on the performance gaps between different types of LLMs across varying dimensions of trustworthiness. Finally, we identify key challenges and promising directions for future research based on our findings. Through this work, we aim to provide a structured foundation for subsequent investigations and practical guidance for developing trustworthy RAG systems in real-world scenarios.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

SurGE: A Benchmark and Evaluation Framework for Scientific Survey Generation

The rapid growth of academic literature makes the manual creation of scientific surveys increasingly infeasible. While large language models show promise for automating this process, progress in this area is hindered by the absence of standardized benchmarks and evaluation protocols. To bridge this critical gap, we introduce SurGE (Survey Generation Evaluation), a new benchmark for scientific survey generation in computer science. SurGE consists of (1) a collection of test instances, each including a topic description, an expert-written survey, and its full set of cited references, and (2) a large-scale academic corpus of over one million papers. In addition, we propose an automated evaluation framework that measures the quality of generated surveys across four dimensions: comprehensiveness, citation accuracy, structural organization, and content quality. Our evaluation of diverse LLM-based methods demonstrates a significant performance gap, revealing that even advanced agentic frameworks struggle with the complexities of survey generation and highlighting the need for future research in this area. We have open-sourced all the code, data, and models at: https://github.com/oneal2000/SurGE

cs.CL↗