arXiv subjects

Jianwei Tai

Publications and source records attributed to Jianwei Tai.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The Security Budget of Code-LLM Prompt Hardening: Provable Limits Under Pass-Only Acceptance

We give a quantitative impossibility result for pass-only prompt hardening of code LLMs. For any deterministic prompt filter $h$ and a registered family of finite executable-equivalence task variables $\mathcal Y_{\mathrm{exec}}$, the shared filtered-prompt channel $\rmI(h(p);h(\tilde p))$ is lower-bounded by a worst-$Y$ Fano floor; on HumanEval and MBPP the universal pass-only floor evaluates to $\mathcal F^{\mathrm{op}}\ge 0.84$ and $1.20$ nats at $η=0.05$ task-collapse tolerance, and the identity row realizes $\mathcal F^{\mathrm{id}}\ge 1.67$ and $1.80$ nats. An estimator-invariance corollary lifts the floor to any deterministic embedding pipeline; a dataset-agnostic corollary states the floor in visible-spec entropy and is empirically witnessed by $164/164$ HumanEval+ and $224/224$ MBPP+ $V(p)$-invariance. We operationalize the floor as the \emph{Tri-Audit Protocol}, a two-axis reporting protocol that separates a prompt-side deductive registry attribute (Shannon nats on the visible-spec representation) from a model-side empirical proxy (KSG-1 primary, MINE secondary, on hidden states). A constrained best-of-family search over deterministic and guarded learned filters on CodeLlama-7B, Qwen2.5-Coder-7B/1.5B and DeepSeek-Coder-6.7B at $n=164$ yields the \emph{Cross-Model Tri-Audit Invariance}: of twenty-eight pass-preserving rows, twelve antecedent-preserving deterministic rows fail proxy-axis leakage reduction on every backbone with sign-invariant positive deviations, twelve antecedent-changed-of-record learned-canonicalizer rows fail proxy-axis leakage on every backbone, and four antecedent-violating rows are reported as registered-family collapse; no filter produces a shared Tri-pass on a nine-cell gate-sensitivity sweep. Pass@1 alone cannot certify code-LLM prompt hardening.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Auditing CoT Answer-Hijack Patches: Source-Control Certificates with Type-I Guarantees

Chain-of-thought (CoT) answer-hijack templates can flip the final numeric answer of a 7B-8B language model on GSM8K or MATH-500 even when the visible reasoning trace looks fluent. Activation patching is the standard probe for locating where this hijack can be undone, and a successful clean-source patch is often read as evidence that the patched activation carries the recovered content. We show that this reading is unsound: clean-only localization profiles (peak, spread, thresholded band) underidentify the frozen-hook source contrast, and the clean-only profile is an intervention map, not a mediation certificate. We then construct an audit that turns each candidate patch into a source-control certificate with a pre-registered Type-I guarantee. The certificate runs in three stages: SELECT (clean-source band sweep with permutation calibration and held-out validation), FREEZE (lock the hook), and AUDIT (paired-bootstrap source contrasts at the frozen hook). It emits an incorrect mechanism label with probability at most alpha = alpha_sel + alpha_audit under sample-split disjointness. A matching-rate sample-complexity theorem (n_star = Theta(Delta^{-2} log(1/alpha))) bounds the audit cost. On Qwen2.5-7B and Llama3-8B, three few-shot/puzzle cells pass confirmatory K=1 localization with held-out gaps +32.6, +45.1, +17.7; fixed-hook reruns recover 47.0% (Qwen-puzzle) and 39.0% (Llama3-puzzle) at n=100; frozen MATH-500 transfer recovers 26.0%. After audit, Llama3-PZ and Qwen-PZ are identity-light with moderate magnitude (Qwen-PZ also layer-sensitive); Llama3-FS is a single-seed moderate-positive candidate (multi-seed replication queued); Qwen-FS is exploratory non-separation with a layer-sensitive flag. The method is a diagnostic auditing protocol, not an adaptive safety defense.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Pretrained, Frozen, Still Leaking: Auditing Cross-Encoder Attribute Transfer in EEG Foundation Models

EEG foundation-model releases are usually audited one endpoint at a time: raw-reconstruction, membership inference, identity linkage, or DP-SGD on the downstream head. We audit the same released embeddings under all four endpoints jointly, on BIOT, LaBraM, and EEGPT, and show that each single-endpoint audit clears releases that still leak spectral attributes. The decisive evidence is a cross-encoder transfer audit: a single ridge attribute decoder learned from one frozen encoder transfers, via a fitted linear bridge, to held-out-subject test splits of every other encoder, with subject-disjoint matched-control 95% CI lower bound at least 0.081 across all six BIOT/LaBraM/EEGPT directions. We prove a sufficient condition: two encoders sharing a nontrivial attribute-coordinate projector overlap beta admit a chained ridge bridge attacker with centered-gain lower bound sqrt(beta/(1+tau^2)) - eps_br - rho_0, and back-solve beta in [0.008, 0.198]. To turn the joint audit into a deployment-readable decision rule we introduce an audit-endpoint disagreement score (AEDS), prove sufficient conditions for its positivity, and bootstrap-calibrate it per cell; AEDS is positive in all eight matched-CI cells (BIOT/LaBraM/EEGPT on EEGMMI; LaBraM on Sleep-EDF, 54-channel LIMO, CHB-MIT pediatric scalp EEG) with p<0.001, while a head-level Carlini LiRA membership audit reaches AUC only 0.50-0.70. Standard defenses fail under audit: a Wiener-style noise-aware adaptive attacker, the LiRA audit, and DP-SGD at every utility-preserving epsilon in {4,8} leave the attribute channel essentially unchanged. The contribution is an audit framework that turns scattered single-endpoint defenses into a joint release decision, supported by a cross-encoder bridge theorem and adaptive-attacker, LiRA, and DP-SGD baselines; the audit licenses release-blocking, not raw-waveform exfiltration or held-out-subject identity recovery.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Brain-Prompt Injection: A Route-Safety Audit for BCI-LLM Agents

BCI-to-agent pipelines turn decoded neural activity into an authorization channel for tool-use agents, exposing a new attack surface we call \emph{brain-prompt injection}: signal-side perturbations, context-only injections, and adaptive dual-decoder attacks can all change the routed action while EEG-side or text-side monitors remain blind. Route safety in this stack depends on what the audit log can observe, not on decoder accuracy or agreement alone. We define a Route-Safety Audit Contract: a minimal log schema, denominator hierarchy, and endpoint specification, and prove an audit-schema separation theorem together with a C3 attacked-dependence decomposition; clean agreement and marginal robustness do not identify the joint term that controls C3 routing. As a calibration layer on top of the contract, we apply split-conformal calibration to a non-oracle EEG confirmation channel and report the resulting false-accept frontier under an explicit threat-archetype matrix. We instantiate the contract on EEGMMI native left/right command-control over 5{,}400 events, harmless tool stubs, and seed/case denominators. Provenance blocks C2 routes ($0.000$); agreement-plus-provenance routes C3 flips ($1.000$); confirmation-plus-provenance routes them ($0.000$). The conformal frontier reaches FAR $0.000$ at clean utility $0.150$ for $α=.005$ and FAR $0.119$ at clean utility $0.452$ for $α=.10$ under acquisition isolation; an attacker-controllable confirmation channel breaks the bound to $\approx\!1$. Subject-cluster bootstrap confirms these intervals on $60$ subjects; cross-architecture (TinyEEGNet, EEGNetV4) and capacity-sweep results show within-regime saturation. Mediation and confirmation reduce risk; they are not intent certificates.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Same Weights, Different Robot: A Deployment Safety View of VLA Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies are often treated as checkpoint-defined objects: if the weights, prompt, and benchmark suite match, the deployment is assumed to be the same policy. Robot execution breaks this assumption because the same normalized model output can become a different physical action after action unnormalization and controller conventions are applied. This creates a deployment-safety gap: safety review can certify the checkpoint while missing the executable robot policy that reaches the controller. We formalize this gap as an executable policy specification problem: a VLA policy includes the learned model, action representation, metadata-selected unnormalizer, and controller-facing conventions. Under this view, identical checkpoints can be executable-inequivalent. For quantile-style action normalization, we derive a closed-form metadata mismatch transform and an ExecSpec certificate that measures action-space semantic drift without model inference or rollout. On LIBERO-Goal replay, substituting a plausible sibling metadata key yields mean drift 0.199 over six non-gripper action dimensions and reduces success from 28/28 to 2/28 under full substitution. On LIBERO-Spatial replay, the same substituted key reduces success from 26/26 to 0/26. The same full-substitution protocol gives 0/28 success for all four Object substitutions and 0/23 or 1/23 success on Long. Identity-key, replay-validity, no-op filtering, raw-vs-correct replay, mask/gripper, synthetic upper-bound, and OpenVLA-style unnormalizer interface checks rule out several simpler explanations. These results do not certify closed-loop or hardware safety. They support a narrower deployment-safety view: action-space metadata is part of the executable policy and should be checked before rollout.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Capability and Robustness Cannot Both Be Free: An Information-Theoretic Bound for Vision-Language-Action Models

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models reach high success rates on clean inputs but collapse under small adversarial perturbations: a $16/255$ PGD attack drops OpenVLA-7B's LIBERO success from $95\%$ to under $5\%$. Whether this trade-off has a theoretical floor was open. We prove that it does. For any VLA policy, capability $I(\Astar;\Api)$ and robustness $I(\Api;\Atildepi)-I(\Api;δ)$ sum to at most $H(\Astar)+I(X;\Xtilde)$, the task entropy plus adversarial channel capacity. The proof reduces to two applications of the Data Processing Inequality. The pixel-level bound is loose by $\sim 10^3$ nats and serves as a ceiling guarantee; an encoder-specific corollary tightens it by over an order of magnitude, into a regime where realized capability already consumes $5$--$9\%$ of the budget. We validate Theorem~\ref{thm:main} with zero violations across $308$ cells: $252$ closed-form Gaussian-VLA, $48$ OpenVLA-7B$+$LIBERO$+$PGD ($4$ suites $\times$ $4$ $\eps$ $\times$ $3$ seeds), $4$ Square-Attack, and $4$ multi-step ($T{=}10$). A complementary measurability inequality $\Rob_{\text{disc}} \le \Cap_{\text{disc}}$ further holds across $144$ cross-architecture cells spanning OpenVLA, OpenVLA-OFT (continuous-$L_1$), and SmolVLA (flow-matching). The same construction yields three label-free diagnostics: a pre-flight encoder ceiling, a defense-forensics probe that localizes input-side vs.\ language-model intervention, and a head-agnostic robustness ratio comparable across discrete-token, $L_1$-regression, and flow-matching policies. Together these provide the cross-setting axis defense and architecture comparisons currently lack.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

Zero-Shot Neural Architecture Search with Weighted Response Correlation

Neural architecture search (NAS) is a promising approach for automatically designing neural network architectures. However, the architecture estimation of NAS is computationally expensive and time-consuming because of training multiple architectures from scratch. Although existing zero-shot NAS methods use training-free proxies to accelerate the architecture estimation, their effectiveness, stability, and generality are still lacking. We present a novel training-free estimation proxy called weighted response correlation (WRCor). WRCor utilizes correlation coefficient matrices of responses across different input samples to calculate the proxy scores of estimated architectures, which can measure their expressivity and generalizability. Experimental results on proxy evaluation demonstrate that WRCor and its voting proxies are more efficient estimation strategies than existing proxies. We also apply them with different search strategies in architecture search. Experimental results on architecture search show that our zero-shot NAS algorithm outperforms most existing NAS algorithms in different search spaces. Our NAS algorithm can discover an architecture with a 22.1% test error on the ImageNet-1k dataset within 4 GPU hours. All codes are publicly available at https://github.com/kunjing96/ZSNAS-WRCor.git.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

SEEF-ALDR: A Speaker Embedding Enhancement Framework via Adversarial Learning based Disentangled Representation

Speaker verification, as a biometric authentication mechanism, has been widely used due to the pervasiveness of voice control on smart devices. However, the task of "in-the-wild" speaker verification is still challenging, considering the speech samples may contain lots of identity-unrelated information, e.g., background noise, reverberation, emotion, etc. Previous works focus on optimizing the model to improve verification accuracy, without taking into account the elimination of the impact from the identity-unrelated information. To solve the above problem, we propose SEEF-ALDR, a novel Speaker Embedding Enhancement Framework via Adversarial Learning based Disentangled Representation, to reinforce the performance of existing models on speaker verification. The key idea is to retrieve as much speaker identity information as possible from the original speech, thus minimizing the impact of identity-unrelated information on the speaker verification task by using adversarial learning. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework can significantly improve the performance of speaker verification by 20.3% and 23.8% on average over 13 tested baselines on dataset Voxceleb1 and 8 tested baselines on dataset Voxceleb2 respectively, without adjusting the structure or hyper-parameters of them. Furthermore, the ablation study was conducted to evaluate the contribution of each module in SEEF-ALDR. Finally, porting an existing model into the proposed framework is straightforward and cost-efficient, with very little effort from the model owners due to the modular design of the framework.

eess.AS↗

arXiv2020

ET-GAN: Cross-Language Emotion Transfer Based on Cycle-Consistent Generative Adversarial Networks

Despite the remarkable progress made in synthesizing emotional speech from text, it is still challenging to provide emotion information to existing speech segments. Previous methods mainly rely on parallel data, and few works have studied the generalization ability for one model to transfer emotion information across different languages. To cope with such problems, we propose an emotion transfer system named ET-GAN, for learning language-independent emotion transfer from one emotion to another without parallel training samples. Based on cycle-consistent generative adversarial network, our method ensures the transfer of only emotion information across speeches with simple loss designs. Besides, we introduce an approach for migrating emotion information across different languages by using transfer learning. The experiment results show that our method can efficiently generate high-quality emotional speech for any given emotion category, without aligned speech pairs.

cs.SD↗