arXiv subjects

Jiangxu Lin

Publications and source records attributed to Jiangxu Lin.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

IF:CARGO: LLM-Based Semantic Compilation for Al-Native Rule Programming Games

This case study presents IF: CARGO, an experimental puzzle game that uses a large language model as a semantic compiler rather than an autonomous game-playing agent. Players author IF/THEN rules in natural language, which the model translates into a constrained command schema for deterministic validation and execution by the game engine. This architecture creates a playable loop of expression, execution, observation, and revision, framing AI interaction as semantic debugging. A mixed-methods playtest with 24 participants across eight levels examined player attempts, thinking time, perceived controllability, adjustability, and interpretations of the AI's role. Results suggest that players generally understood the model as a translation intermediary and could revise their strategies through feedback, while periodic commands, multi-robot coordination, and rule-priority mechanics created greater cognitive and diagnostic demands. The study proposes a practical pattern for AI-native gameplay: constrain natural-language input, preserve player authorship, and ensure deterministic execution.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

"Pharos Night: Crown Pursuit": An AI-Native Deck-Building and Tactical Arena Game Design Based on Multi-Agent Systems

With advancements in generative AI technology, an increasing number of researchers have begun exploring AI-native games in which gameplay rules are directly driven by generative AI. This paper presents "Pharos Night: Crown Pursuit," an AI-native deck-building and tactical arena game based on a multi-agent system. The game uses large language models to generate materials and cards, support NPC decision-making, and mediate natural-language interactions. During play, players collect materials, describe desired card effects in natural language, and choose whether to negotiate or fight with NPCs in the arena. To constrain model-generated outcomes, the system parses responses as structured JSON, constructs card effects from predefined mechanics, and maps qualitative effect levels to designer-specified numerical values. A small-scale playtest with 13 participants suggests that the system can provide strategically meaningful and engaging AI-driven gameplay, while also revealing challenges related to predictability, transparency, and player control. This work demonstrates the potential of multi-agent generative AI systems for creating more emergent digital game experiences.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Who embraces AI in play? Exploratory modeling of player preference profiles toward game AI

Artificial intelligence is increasingly entering digital games through diverse functions. While prior work has shown that player attitudes toward game AI are strongly context-dependent, less is known about how these attitudes are structurally combined within different groups of players. This study addresses this gap by modeling players' cross-context AI acceptance as interpretable attitude profiles. Based on questionnaire data from 771 digital game players, we apply Archetypal Analysis (AA) to standardized acceptance ratings across eight representative AI application contexts in games. The analysis identifies seven distinctive profiles: AI-Skeptics, Broad AI-Supporters, Creative-Play Explorers, Experience-Oriented Supporters, Systemic Order Advocates, Emotion-Centered Supporters, and Governance-Skeptics. Exploratory one-vs-rest (OvR) logistic regressions further suggest that profile membership is associated with players' perceived AI literacy, gaming habits, disciplinary background, personality traits, and application-specific priorities. By shifting attention from isolated acceptance judgments to patterned preference structures, this study provides an exploratory empirical vocabulary for segmenting game AI audiences and offers preliminary design implications for more context-sensitive and player-sensitive AI integration in digital games.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

"It depends on where AI is used": Players' attitude patterns and evaluative logics toward different AI applications in digital games

As AI becomes increasingly embedded in digital games, players' attitudes de-pend not only on whether AI is used, but also on where and how it intervenes in gameplay. This study examines players' evaluative patterns toward eight AI application contexts, including intelligent NPCs, emergent narrative, dynamic balancing, recommendation systems, review and governance, art asset generation, co-creation gameplay, and gameplay evolution. Based on 1,856 valid open-ended responses from 310 questionnaires, we conducted thematic analysis to identify reasons for acceptance, rejection, and conditional acceptance. Results show that players welcomed AI when it enhanced immersion, personalization, novelty, efficiency, or convenience, but resisted it when it threatened creativity, emotional authenticity, autonomy, fairness, system stability, authorship, or accountability. We further identify six evaluative logics: experiential enrichment, instrumental efficiency, system reliability, agency and control, authorship and compliance, and human oversight. These preliminary findings highlight the context-sensitive nature of AI acceptance in digital games.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

The Double-Edged Sword of Open-Ended Interaction: How LLM-Driven NPCs Affect Players' Cognitive Load and Gaming Experience

This study examines how large language model-driven non-player characters (LLM-NPCs) affect players' cognitive load and gaming experience, with a particular focus on the underlying psychological mechanisms, differences across task scenarios, and the role of individual traits. Conducting a randomized between-subject experiment (N=130) in a self-developed game prototype "Campus Culture Week", we compared player interactions with LLM-NPCs and traditional pre-scripted NPCs across multiple interactive modules. The results showed that LLM-NPCs significantly increased players' cognitive load (p < .001), an effect mediated by factors such as expressive effort and response uncertainty. However, LLM-NPCs did not yield a statistically significant improvement in overall gaming experience (p = .195); while they positively influenced players' perceived autonomy, they exerted a negative influence on system usability and trust. The effects of LLM-NPCs also significantly varied across task scenarios (p < .001), with stronger increases in cognitive load in more open-ended modules such as content creation and relationship building. The influence of individual differences was generally limited, although the personality traits of extraversion (p = .031) and neuroticism (p = .047) demonstrated some predictive power regarding cognitive load. This study provides empirical evidence for understanding the "double-edged sword" effect of LLM-NPCs on player experience, and highlight the importance of scenario-sensitive and user-sensitive design in intelligent NPC systems.

cs.HC↗