Jialin Yu | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

SOLO: Stable Omni-terrain Long-Horizon Perceptive Humanoid Locomotion

Humans traverse complex terrain over long distances without losing balance, whereas perceptive humanoid policies become fragile as perception and control errors accumulate. We present SOLO, a unified framework addressing two compounding causes of this long-horizon fragility: dense terrain reconstruction smooths action-critical details, and pointwise imitation lacks temporal credit assignment. Its Query Reconstructor (QR) uses Fourier-encoded cell queries to retrieve spatially specific evidence from depth-proprioception tokens, preserving sharp terrain boundaries. Trajectory-Aware MSE (TA-MSE) Distillation adds next-state teacher-student disagreement to the PPO reward, enabling Generalized Advantage Estimation to propagate future disagreement penalties to preceding actions. In simulation, QR reduces height-map L1 error by factors of 3.3-4.0, while TA-MSE surpasses PPO and MSE+PPO in curriculum progression. On stress-test terrains, SOLO achieves 97.5% mean traversal success and 96% stepping-stone success, versus 75.0-75.6% and 0-3% for dense-reconstructor variants. Deployed zero-shot with only a chest-mounted depth camera and proprioception, SOLO completes a continuous 1.5-km outdoor route and an indoor mixed-terrain course. Project page: https://sunpihai-up.github.io/solo/

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Conformalized Large Language Models under Configuration Shift

Conformal prediction (CP) is a distribution-free framework for uncertainty quantification that has recently been adapted to large language models (LLMs), providing prediction sets with finite-sample coverage guarantees under exchangeability. Yet for LLMs, nonconformity scores are often induced by an inference pipeline, not just a fixed model, making them depend not only on the data distribution but also on configurable factors such as the prompt template, decoding parameters, and deployment setting. Since such configurations are routinely modified in practice but rarely treated as a source of shift, their impact on CP validity remains poorly understood. We call this \emph{configuration shift} and study it systematically along three axes: prompt template, decoding temperature, and weight quantization. In a broad empirical study spanning $9$ LLMs, $4$ datasets, and $4$ nonconformity scores, we find that configuration shift consistently erodes CP validity, often driving empirical coverage below the target. By contrast, efficiency is largely preserved: valid prediction sets remain close in size to the i.i.d. baseline. We derive coverage lower bounds that attribute this loss to a discrepancy between calibration and test score distributions, and use their finite-sample plug-in versions as empirical diagnostics of shift severity. We further show that these findings lead to practical mitigations: bound-inspired recalibration is effective with limited test examples, while fragility-aware calibration ensembling recovers much of the lost coverage without test data.

cs.LG↗