arXiv subjects

Jethro Odeyemi

Publications and source records attributed to Jethro Odeyemi.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Personalising a Cross-User Surface Electromyography Encoder Under a Small Calibration Budget

A myoelectric interface needs calibration from the user before it will function. Earlier work has treated calibration as a quantity, but has not asked the question of what a device should do with the calibration repetitions once they have been collected. This paper views personalizing the cross-user encoder as a design decision with a cost. Four alternative approaches to using exactly the same labeled repetitions were tested from a single cross-user encoder per held-out subject. Prototypical adaptation, linear probes, scaled fine-tuning and full fine-tuning were tested at every budget up to the maximum each database allows, five repetitions on DB1 and four on DB2 and DB5. Comparing four ways to spend a small calibration budget across 77 subjects, full fine-tuning is the most accurate at every budget, consistently enough that there is no exception among subsets of subjects. The result which impacts how one might make an engineering decision however is that a gradient free prototypical rule recovers 52 to 78 per cent of its benefit with no optimiser and no per-user copy of the weights, which makes personalisation something a worn device can do at donning time. The widespread intuition that a good representation only needs a fresh classifier is incorrect here. How well each method may perform relative to a per-user classifier that would be fitted by a clinic will depend on the specific database.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Intact-to-Amputee Transfer in Surface-EMG Gesture Decoding: Training Source and Calibration Budget

A recogniser trained on one person rarely transfers to the next, and useful performance usually demands a fresh round of labelled calibration from the end user. A systematic review of 1077 studies quantifies where the evidence is thin: amputees appear in about one in six. Here a montage-agnostic cross-user encoder is carried to eleven transradial amputees on a protocol matched to its intact-limb training data. Zero-shot cross-population transfer fails outright: the encoder requires labeled data from the new user before it begins decoding, and it then exceeds the per-user classifier a clinic would fit by 0.190 macro F1 at three repetitions and for every subject in the cohort. Given three labelled repetitions it reaches 0.779 macro-F1 against 0.589 for the per-user pipeline. Training on forty intact subjects produces better transfers to a new amputee than training on ten other amputees, and combining the two produces better transfers than either individually. The prediction pre-registered for this study, which extends the encoder's baseline-strength account with the premise that amputee EMG is less separable, holds true only after a few repetitions become available and after enriching the source pool with additional amputees. At a single repetition, and at every budget under a source matched to the intact-limb comparison, it fails. Thus, it locates the boundary of the proposed account.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

A Montage-Agnostic Encoder for Calibration-Light Cross-User Gesture Recognition from Surface Electromyography

Pattern-recognition control promises a myoelectric prosthesis that responds to many intended gestures rather than one or two, but the promise has stayed in the laboratory. A recogniser trained on one person rarely transfers to the next, and useful performance usually demands a fresh round of labelled calibration from the end user. A montage-agnostic encoder is introduced that reads each electrode with shared weights and locates it by its physical coordinate rather than its index, so one architecture ingests any channel count without montage-specific parameters. Trained across users, it exceeds a per-user Hudgins and linear-discriminant classifier by 0.234 macro-F1 on DB1 for every held-out subject and by 0.108 on DB2, and falls below it on the ten-subject DB5. Each of the encoder's three key components individually accounts for more than half of its 3-shot macro F1 in an otherwise budget-matched ablation study. A controlled subject-count sweep shows the margin is close to flat from nine training subjects to thirty-nine, so the training pool binds only as a stability floor below which cross-user training fails to converge; what tracks the direction of the comparison across the three databases is instead the strength of the per-user baseline, which signal fidelity sets. Comparing against an LDA baseline depends on budget spent training models and on how good that baseline is, and self-supervised pretraining had no benefits once a supervised model was adequately trained.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Recognition and Label-Free Adaptation Across Recording Sessions in Surface-EMG Gesture Decoding

Recognition accuracy obtained during a recording session does not persist when a user puts on the electrodes again after the electrodes had previously been removed. The electrodes may have moved slightly, the skin may be drier or wetter, or the elbow may be positioned differently; these factors all contribute to day-to-day variability and therefore represent a major obstacle to implementing successful pattern-recognition based myoelectric control systems in daily practice. However, simply recalibrating a user's hand for 20 min at every doff/don event is a clearly unrealistic expectation. A montage-agnostic encoder built for cross-user, cross-montage transfer is trained here using data collected during a particular recording session, and then applied to data collected later in a different recording session without adjusting anything, on the ten intact subjects of NinaPro DB6. The performance of this approach is compared to that of a per-user LDA classification pipeline, and to that of two published approaches that only rely on source data collected from the same recording session. Carried unchanged across recording sessions, the encoder retains 0.688 macro-F1 against 0.540 for the per-user pipeline, and, on the per-window metric the published baselines use, sits above both published source-only results, a band of two points that locates the encoder rather than ranking it. Of five label-free test-time adaptations, only feature-statistic alignment improves every subject; batch-normalisation re-estimation, a standard method in the domain-adaptation literature, collapses this architecture entirely. Aligning the encoder's feature statistics to the new session recovers about what a single labelled calibration repetition would.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Benchmarking Randomized Optimization Algorithms on Binary, Permutation, and Combinatorial Problem Landscapes

In this paper, we evaluate the performance of four randomized optimization algorithms: Randomized Hill Climbing (RHC), Simulated Annealing (SA), Genetic Algorithms (GA), and MIMIC (Mutual Information Maximizing Input Clustering), across three distinct types of problems: binary, permutation, and combinatorial. We systematically compare these algorithms using a set of benchmark fitness functions that highlight the specific challenges and requirements of each problem category. Our study analyzes each algorithm's effectiveness based on key performance metrics, including solution quality, convergence speed, computational cost, and robustness. Results show that while MIMIC and GA excel in producing high-quality solutions for binary and combinatorial problems, their computational demands vary significantly. RHC and SA, while computationally less expensive, demonstrate limited performance in complex problem landscapes. The findings offer valuable insights into the trade-offs between different optimization strategies and provide practical guidance for selecting the appropriate algorithm based on the type of problems, accuracy requirements, and computational constraints.

cs.NE↗