Jeremy Moebel | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Rethinking One-Step Image Editing through ChordEdit: Reproduction, Simplification, and New Insights

One-step image editing is important for making text-guided editing fast, practical, and easy to deploy, but its underlying mechanism is still not fully understood. We revisit ChordEdit through reproduction, ablation, and simplification. Our analysis shows that a) the chord window $\delta$ largely acts as an effective timestep shift from $t$ to $t - \delta$; b) chord transport acts on high-noise images and mainly performs low-frequency semantic editing; and c) proximal alignment acts on low-noise images and complements it by adding high-frequency target details. In this view, ChordEdit naturally decomposes editing into a coarse low-frequency transport stage and a fine high-frequency alignment stage. These findings suggest a path toward prompt-conditioned dynamic timestep selection for adaptive image editing. All code and results can be found at \href{https://github.com/Harvard-AI-and-Robotics-Lab/ChordEdit-Reproduction}{link}.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

VAGS: Velocity Adaptive Guidance Scale for Image Editing and Generation

Classifier-free guidance (CFG) is the primary control over how strongly text semantics move a flow-based sampler, yet standard practice holds its scale fixed across the entire ODE trajectory. This is a fundamental mismatch: early steps are noise-dominated and carry weak semantic signal, while late steps commit image structure and demand stronger directional commitment; more critically, the value of any guidance strength depends on whether the guided velocity is consistent with the model's current dynamics or working against them. We propose \textit{Velocity-Adaptive Guidance Scale} (VAGS), a training-free replacement that multiplies the nominal scale by a bounded factor combining a temporal signal-level term with the cosine similarity between task-relevant velocity fields. For inversion-free editing, VAGS measures the alignment between source- and target-guided velocities, so edit strength at each step reflects local compatibility between preservation and transformation. For generation, VAGS-Gen uses the alignment between unconditional and conditional velocities as the analogous signal. Neither variant requires fine-tuning, auxiliary networks, or extra forward passes, and fixed CFG is recovered as a special case. On PIE-Bench and DIV2K for editing, and COCO17, CUB-200, and Flickr30K for generation, VAGS consistently improves structural fidelity and generation quality over fixed CFG and recent training-free guidance variants. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/Harvard-AI-and-Robotics-Lab/Velocity_Adaptive_Guidance_Scale.

cs.CV↗