arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Ivan Stresec

Publications and source records attributed to Ivan Stresec.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

LAVA: Explainability for Unsupervised Latent Embeddings

Unsupervised black-box models are drivers of scientific discovery, yet are difficult to interpret, as their output is often a multidimensional embedding rather than a well-defined target. While explainability for supervised learning uncovers how input features contribute to predictions, its unsupervised counterpart should relate input features to the structure of the learned embeddings. However, adaptations of supervised model explainability for unsupervised learning provide either single-sample or dataset-summary explanations, remaining too fine-grained or reductive to be meaningful, and cannot explain embeddings without mapping functions. To bridge this gap, we propose LAVA, a post-hoc model-agnostic method to explain local embedding organization through feature covariation in the original input data. LAVA explanations comprise modules, capturing local subpatterns of input feature correlation that reoccur globally across the embeddings. LAVA delivers stable explanations at a desired level of granularity, revealing domain-relevant patterns such as visual parts of images or disease signals in cellular processes, otherwise missed by existing methods.

cs.LG

Using Focal Loss to Fight Shallow Heuristics: An Empirical Analysis of Modulated Cross-Entropy in Natural Language Inference

There is no such thing as a perfect dataset. In some datasets, deep neural networks discover underlying heuristics that allow them to take shortcuts in the learning process, resulting in poor generalization capability. Instead of using standard cross-entropy, we explore whether a modulated version of cross-entropy called focal loss can constrain the model so as not to use heuristics and improve generalization performance. Our experiments in natural language inference show that focal loss has a regularizing impact on the learning process, increasing accuracy on out-of-distribution data, but slightly decreasing performance on in-distribution data. Despite the improved out-of-distribution performance, we demonstrate the shortcomings of focal loss and its inferiority in comparison to the performance of methods such as unbiased focal loss and self-debiasing ensembles.

cs.CL