arXiv subjects

Ivan Kitov

Publications and source records attributed to Ivan Kitov.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Recovery of low-magnitude seismic events before the July 29, 2025, Kamchatka megathrust earthquake using waveform cross-correlation enhanced by the addition of stochastic noise

The July 29, 2025, Kamchatka megathrust earthquake is one of the largest events in the 21st century. It is likely the best-instrumented case, with numerous stations at regional and teleseismic distances, including high-performance seismic arrays of the International Monitoring System (IMS). The waveform cross-correlation (WCC) method applied to seismic arrays allowed a significant improvement in signal detection accompanied by enhancements in phase association algorithms. Since the WCC detector is the core algorithm of the matched filter method, its efficiency critically depends on the ambient seismic noise coherency with the template signal, with fully stochastic noise providing optimal detection conditions. To suppress the coherent noise component and improve WCC detection, we add a numerically generated random noise sequence adjusted in amplitude to the natural noise. This method is similar to noise whitening used in many acoustic applications, but in this study, it is applied before the matched filter is used. The detection threshold gain can be several times higher than that obtained with a pure WCC detector. The recovery of the low-magnitude seismicity obtained by the WCC applied to the IMS arrays and three-component stations prior to the July 29, 2025, Kamchatka earthquake is significantly improved by the random noise addition.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2026

Effects of stochastic and natural seismic noise on the performance of waveform cross-correlation used to recover low-magnitude seismicity prior to the July 29, 2025, Kamchatka earthquake

Waveform cross-correlation (WCC) applied to data from seismic arrays allows for the reduction of the detection threshold by approximately an order of magnitude. When applied to the data of the IMS, the smallest WCC detected events were by at least one magnitude unit lower than those reported by the IDC and revealed that the pattern of low-magnitude activity prior to the July 29, 2025, earthquake was similar to that prior to the May 24, 2013, Sea of Okhotsk earthquake. The consistent increase in the number of events with magnitudes approaching the corner value of the Kamchatka recurrence curve can likely be used as a precursory indicator of a mega-earthquake preparation. The WCC-based events are characterized by detections with a signal-to-noise ratio below the IDC detection threshold and are often not visible to analysts. This makes the statistical significance of the WCC event hypotheses uncertain due to the absence of a random noise reference and the potential side-sensitivity of the IMS arrays. Both problems are addressed. Random noise is used to calculate a WCC bulletin. This exercise shows a negligibly low number of WCC events and confirms the statistical significance of the WCC-based events. The side-sensitivity is modelled using the March 11, 2011, Tohoku earthquake. When master events (MEs) within the Kamchatka region are used in the WCC processing, a large number of false events are generated. When MEs from the Tohoku zone are added, all false events disappear since the Tohoku MEs win the conflict resolution process. When the random noise is scaled to a small fraction of the maximum amplitude within the processed interval, the WCC detection is enhanced with more detections and WCC-based events created. This is an effect similar to noise whitening, which makes the matched filter detector more sensitive and closer to its optimal performance under stochastic noise conditions.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2026

Seismic noise suppression: array stations, waveform cross-correlation, and noise stochastization

Seismic noise with an amplitude higher than that of the sought signal is a challenge for detection. Several techniques have been developed to suppress the ambient noise and to reduce the detection threshold in order to find signals with the lowest possible amplitudes produced by events with the magnitudes significant for scientific research and technical applications. Seismic arrays were introduced in the late 1950s as a method for improving underground test monitoring, potentially reducing detection thresholds by fivefold or more by exploiting destructive interference effects of a quasi-random noise. The beamforming method is the backbone of data processing at the International Data Centre (IDC) with more than 30 array stations of the International Monitoring System (IMS) installed around the globe. The matched filter method allows for the suppression of noise incoherent to the sought signal. It employs waveform cross-correlation (WCC) with templates based on actual and simulated seismic signals to improve the signal-to-noise ratio estimates for similar signals. The performance of this method is significantly enhanced when it is applied to a seismic array. A novel technique combined with WCC, is the noise stochastization or the addition of scaled random noise to the actual data before calculating the cross-correlation coefficient. The stochastic component can easily be generated by a computer program. Alternatively, a regular signal propagating at an angle of around 90{\deg} to the plane of the sought signal can play a role of stochastic component at array stations. We demonstrate the separate and joint effects of these noise reduction techniques on the WCC performance, when applied to filtered data from selected IMS arrays and various waveform templates of historical events available at the IDC.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2026

Spatio-temporal evolution of low-magnitude seismicity before the May 24, 2013, Sea of Okhotsk earthquake recovered by waveform cross correlation. Is it an earthquake prediction case?

According to the International Data Centre (IDC), the Sea of Okhotsk earthquake occurred at 05:44:49.7 on May 24, 2013, had coordinates 54.89{\deg}N,153.31{\deg}E, mb=6.27, and depth of 604 km. The USGS moment magnitude is 8.3. The previous event detected by the IDC in the surrounding volume 53{\deg}N-57{\deg}N, 151{\deg}E-155{\deg}E, depth from 400 to 700 km occurred on February 6, 2012. Using the same seismic data from the stations of the International Monitoring System together with detection and phase association methods based on waveform cross correlation, a series of low-magnitude earthquakes was recovered immediately before this major earthquake. More than 200 events obeying the Event Definition Criteria adapted by the IDC were found between May 13 and the mainshock, with a sudden increase in their occurrence rate starting on the afternoon May 19. The evolution of the numbers of these low-magnitude earthquakes in various ranges of statistical significance within the source volume demonstrates some features, which can be related to the approaching initiation of the Sea of Okhotsk earthquake.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2026

An example of regional seismicity recovery on June 22, 2020, using waveform cross-correlation

June 22nd, 2020 was an important day for nuclear test monitoring. The US undersecretary, Thomas DiNanno, made an official claim that a secret nuclear test was conducted at the Lop Nor testing site on that day. However, the Provisional Technical Secretariat (PTS) of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) reported that there were no seismic events consistent with a nuclear explosion on that date. This means that the event was either hidden under the threshold of the international monitoring system (IMS), or it was missed by the international data center (IDC). Alternatively, no event occurred. All scenarios are of interest to the scientific community. The routine processing of seismic data by the IDC is well documented in open sources. The threshold for detection is not uniform across the globe, especially in continental areas. Additionally, it is not low enough to detect weapon-sized explosions using the cavity decoupling method. There are methods to lower this threshold using waveform cross-correlation (WCC) techniques. On June 22th, 2020, the IDC ran a preliminary pipeline for processing seismic data from the IMS. This was done in a testing mode. Since 2020, the development of WCC methods has allowed for revisiting cases and obtaining high-quality reports on events that were not reported five years ago.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2021

Distinguishing the aftershock sequences of the DPRK5 and DPRK6 underground nuclear tests

The rate of aftershocks in the sequence initiated by the DPRK underground tests has been increasing since January 2021. In total, 22 reliable aftershocks were detected between January 13 and October 1, 2021. Their characteristics are similar to the aftershocks in one of two clusters: 1) the fifth DPRK (DPRK5) test (mb(IDC)=5.09) conducted on September 9, 2016, which induced the first DPRK aftershock in the sequence detected at 1:50:48 UTC on September 11, 2016; 2) the sixth DPRK (DPRK6) explosion (mb(IDC)=6.07), which generates its aftershock sequence with characteristics significantly different from the aftershocks in the DPRK5 sequence. The length, intensity, and alternating character of these sequences suggest specific mechanisms of energy release likely associated with the interaction of the damaged zones of the DPRK5 and DPRK6 and the collapse of their cavities with progressive propagation of the collapsing chimneys to the free surface. According to the depth estimates based on the moment tensor modelling, the DPRK5 and DPRK6 were conducted at practically the same depths. The difference in magnitudes suggests that their damaged zones differ by a factor of 2 or more. The first aftershock of the DPRK6 (mb(IDC=4.12) 8.5 minutes after the test is evidence of the cavity collapse and creation of a chimney, which did not reach the surface. The activity in 2021 indicates that the chimney collapse is not finished yet. One can expect more aftershocks in the near future, likely ended with the chimney reaching the free surface.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2021

Seismic events found by waveform cross correlation after the announced underground nuclear tests conducted by the DPRK on 12.02.2013 and 06.01.2016. Aftershocks or hidden nuclear tests?

The multi-master method based on waveform cross-correlation has found several aftershocks of the third (DPRK3) and the fourth (DPRK4) announced underground nuclear tests conducted by the DPRK on 12.02.2013, and 06.01.2016, respectively. The second DPRK test had no reliable aftershock hypotheses at the level of the method sensitivity and resolution. The closest to the test site array station USRK was not operational before 20.12.2008 and the first DPRK test cannot be analyzed by the multi-master method based on waveform templates from two IMS stations - USRK and KSRS. The largest aftershocks of the DPRK3 and DPRK4 are close in magnitude to the first aftershock of the DPRK5 on 11.09.2016, and many aftershocks of the DPRK6. Three big aftershocks of the DPRK3 occurred on 25.05.2014, i.e. 467 days after the mainshock. The DPRK3 aftershock found at 6:43:03 UTC had a relative magnitude of 2.91. There were found two aftershocks of the DPRK4: on 19.02.2016 (0:28:07 UTC) and on 02.07.2016 (19:52:27 UTC). The largest aftershocks of the DPRK3 and DPRK4 could be interpreted as related to the cavity collapse process likely followed by a chimney collapse, not reaching the free surface, however, as no noble gases and/or radionuclide particles were detected. Seismic signals from all events found before the DPRK5 (09.09.2016), had a high level of cross-correlation with the waveform templates of the DRPK5 and DPRK6. These signals prove the shape similarity, and thus, the close spatial proximity of the seismic events after DPRK3/DPRK4 to the DPRK5/DPRK6 aftershocks. There were no other events found by the multi-master method since 01.01.2009, even when the highest resolution regime was used. The resolution and sensitivity of the multi-master method were tuned and tested using the data after 09.09.2016.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2021

Real GDP per capita: global redistribution of economic power

Growth rate of real GDP per capita, GDPpc, is represented as a sum of two components, a monotonically decreasing economic trend and fluctuations related to population change. The economic trend is modelled by an inverse function of GDPpc with a constant numerator which varies for the largest developed economies. In 2006, a statistical analysis conducted for 19 selected OECD countries for the period between 1950 and 2003 showed a very weak linear trend in the annual GDPpc increment for the largest economies: the USA, Japan, France, Italy, and Spain. The UK, Australia, and Canada showed a slightly steeper positive linear trend. The 2012 revision showed that the positive trends became much lower and some of them fell below zero due to the Great Recession. The fluctuations around the trend values are characterized by a quasi-normal distribution with heavy and asymmetric tails. This research revises the previous estimates and extends the set of studied countries by economies in East Europe, Latin America, BRICS, Africa, and Asia including several positive outliers with extremely fast growth. The change in GDP definitions and measuring procedures with time and economic source is discussed in relation to the statistical significance of the trend estimates and data quality requirements for a consistent economic model. The relative performance of all counties since 1960 is compared according to the predicted total GDPpc growth as a function of the initial value. The performance in the 21st century is analyzed separately as revealing potential and actual shifts in the global economic powers.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2021

The link between unemployment and real economic growth in developed countries

Ten years ago we presented a modified version of Okun law for the biggest developed economies and reported its excellent predictive power. In this study, we revisit the original models using the estimates of real GDP per capita and unemployment rate between 2010 and 2019. The initial results show that the change in unemployment rate can be accurately predicted by variations in the rate of real economic growth. There is a discrete version of the model which is represented by a piece wise linear dependence of the annual increment in unemployment rate on the annual rate of change in real GDP per capita. The lengths of the country-dependent time segments are defined by breaks in the GDP measurement units associated with definitional revisions to the nominal GDP and GDP deflator (dGDP). The difference between the CPI and dGDP indices since the beginning of measurements reveals the years of such breaks. Statistically, the link between the studied variables in the revised models is characterized by the coefficient of determination in the range from R2=0.866 (Australia) to R2=0.977 (France). The residual errors can be likely associated with the measurement errors, e.g. the estimates of real GDP per capita from various sources differ by tens of percent. The obtained results confirm the original finding on the absence of structural unemployment in the studied developed countries.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2020

Race and gender income inequality in the USA: black women vs. white men

Income inequality between different races in the U.S. is especially large. This difference is even larger when gender is involved. In a complementary study, we have developed a dynamic microeconomic model accurately describing the evolution of male and female incomes since 1930. Here, we extend our analysis and model the disparity between black and white population in the U.S., separately for males and females. Unfortunately, income microdata provided by the U.S. Census Bureau for other races and ethnic groups are not time compatible or too short for modelling purposes. We are forced to constrain our analysis to black and white population, but all principal results can be extrapolated to other races and ethnicities. Our analysis shows that black females and white males are two poles of the overall income inequality. The prediction of income distribution for two extreme cases with one model is the main challenge of this study.

q-fin.GN↗

arXiv2017

The use of waveform cross correlation to recover the aftershock sequence of the August 14, 2016 earthquake within Sakhalin Island

The method of waveforms cross correlation (WCC) is used to detect signals from aftershocks of the August 14, 2016 earthquake within Sakhalin Island, which had local magnitude ML = 6.1. Arrivals of regular P- and S-waves detected by the WCC method with various master events at 6 regional stations are associated into a set of seismic events called the cross correlation standard event list (XSEL). We compare the XSEL with the bulletin for the same aftershock sequence compiled in routine seismological processing. The principal advantage of the XSEL is expressed in the increasing number of found seismic events with three or more associated stations, a slight decrease in the magnitude threshold of catalogue completeness, and more accurate location of the epicentres for even the smallest aftershocks. The improved aftershock locations tend to cluster in a narrow zone corresponding to the western board of the Central Sakhalin fault, which defines the boundary between the Okhotsk and the Eurasian (Amur) slabs.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2017

Discrimination of the DPRK underground explosions and their aftershocks using the P/S spectral amplitude ratio

We have estimated the performance of discrimination criterion based on the P/S spectral amplitude ratios obtained from six underground tests conducted by the DPRK since October 2006 and six aftershocks induced by the last two explosions. Two aftershocks were detected in routine processing at the IDC. Three aftershocks were detected by a prototype waveform cross correlation procedure with explosions as master events, and one aftershock was found with the aftershocks as master event. Two seismic arrays USRK and KSRS of the IMS and two non-IMS 3-C stations SEHB (South Korea) and MDJ (China) were used. With increasing frequency, all stations demonstrate approximately the same level of deviation between the Pg/Lg spectral amplitude ratios belonging to the DPRK explosions and their aftershocks. For a single station, simple statistical estimates show that the probability of any of six aftershocks not to be a sample from the explosion population is larger than 99.996% at the KSRS and even larger at USRK. The probability of any of the DPRK explosion to be a representative of the aftershock population is extremely small as defined by the distance of 20 and more standard deviations to the mean explosion Pg/Lg value. For network discrimination, we use the Mahalanobis distance combining the Pg/Lg estimates at three stations: USRK, KSRS and MDJ. At frequencies above 4 Hz, the (squared) Mahalanobis distance, D2, between the populations of explosions and aftershocks is larger than 100. In the frequency band between 6 and 12 Hz at USRK, the aftershocks distance from the average explosion D2>21,000. Statistically, the probability to confuse explosions and aftershocks is negligible. These discrimination results are related only to the aftershocks of the DPRK tests and cannot be directly extrapolated to the population of tectonic earthquakes in the same area.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2016

Comprehensive recovery of a weak aftershock sequence in the North Atlantic using waveform cross correlation

We apply cross correlation between multichannel seismic waveforms as a technique for signal detection and automatic event building at the International Data Centre (IDC). This technique allows detecting signals with amplitudes by at least a factor of two lower than those found in the current version of IDC processing. Previously, we processed with a cross correlation detector aftershock sequences of a large earthquake with thousands of aftershocks detected by the International Monitoring System (IMS) and a middle-size earthquake (hundreds of aftershocks). Our study has revealed that the official Reviewed Event Bulletin (REB) of the IDC misses from 50% to 70% valid seismic events. Since the IDC is a major contributor to the International Seismological Centre (ISC) these extra events together with the associated arrivals are missing from the ISC bulletin which is an open data source for the broader seismological and geophysical community.Here, we assess the ultimate resolution of the cross correlation technique with specific IDC constraints. The aftershock sequence of the October 5, 2011 mb(IDC)4.2 earthquake in the North Atlantic is an example of a weak sequence and includes only 38 REB events. The number and quality of these REB events, which are used as master events, allow conducting a comprehensive interactive review by experienced analysts of all event hypotheses obtained by the cross correlation technique. In an iterative procedure starting from the main shock, all 38 REB events were found and analysts added 26 REB events. Therefore, the cross correlation pipeline reduces the detection threshold by a factor of 2 to 3 and approximately doubles the number of events in the REB, and thus, in the ISC bulletin for the North Atlantic.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2016

Remote monitoring of weak aftershock activity with waveform cross correlation: the case of the DPRK September 9, 2016 underground test

The method of waveform cross correlation (WCC) allows remote monitoring of weak seismic activity induced by underground tests. This type of monitoring is considered as a principal task of on-site inspection under the Comprehensive nuclear-test-ban treaty. On September 11, 2016, a seismic event with body wave magnitude 2.1 was found in automatic processing near the epicenter of the underground explosion conducted by the DPRK on September 9, 2016. This event occurred approximately two days after the test. Using the WCC method, two array stations of the International Monitoring System (IMS), USRK and KSRS, detected Pn-wave arrivals, which were associated with a unique event. Standard automatic processing at the International Data Centre (IDC) did not create an event hypothesis, but in the following interactive processing based on WCC detections, an IDC analyst was able to create a two-station event . Location and other characteristics of this small seismic source indicate that it is likely an aftershock of the preceding explosion. Building on the success of automatic detection and phase association, we carried out an extended analysis, which included later phases and closest non-IMS stations. The final cross correlation solution uses four stations, including MDJ (China) and SEHB (Republic of Korea), with the epicenter approximately 2 km to north-west from the epicenter of the Sept. 9 test. We also located the aftershock epicenter by standard IDC program LocSAT using the arrival times obtained by cross correlation. The distance between the DPRK and LocSAT aftershock epicenters is 25.5 km, i.e. by an order of magnitude larger than that obtained by the WCC relative location method.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2015

Gender income disparity in the USA: analysis and dynamic modelling

We analyze and develop a quantitative model describing the evolution of personal income distribution, PID, for males and females in the U.S. between 1930 and 2014. The overall microeconomic model, which we introduced ten years ago, accurately predicts the change in mean income as a function of age as well as the dependence on age of the portion of people distributed according to the Pareto law. As a result, we have precisely described the change in Gini ratio since the start of income measurements in 1947. The overall population consists of two genders, however, which have different income distributions. The difference between incomes earned by male and female population has been experiencing dramatic changes over time. Here, we model the internal dynamics of men and women PIDs separately and then describe their relative contribution to the overall PID. Our original model is refined to match all principal gender-dependent observations. We found that women in the U.S. are deprived of higher job positions. This is the cause of the long term income inequality between males and females in the U.S. It is unjust to women and has a negative effect on real economic growth. Women have been catching up since the 1960s and that improves the performance of the U.S. economy. It will take decades, however, to full income equality between genders. There are no new defining parameters included in the model except the critical age, when people start to lose their incomes, was split into two critical ages for low-middle incomes and the highest incomes, which obey a power law distribution. Such an extension becomes necessary in order to match the observation that the female population in the earlier 1960s was practically not represented in the highest incomes.

q-fin.GN↗

arXiv2015

How universal is the law of income distribution? Cross country comparison

The evolution of personal income distribution (PID) in four countries: Canada, New Zealand, the UK, and the USA follows a unique trajectory. We have revealed precise match in the shape of two age-dependent features of the PID: mean income and the portion of people with the highest incomes (2 to 5% of the working age population). Because of the U.S. economic superiority, as expressed by real GDP per head, the curves of mean income and the portion of rich people currently observed in three chasing countries one-to-one reproduce the curves measured in the USA 15 to 25 years before. This result of cross country comparison implies that the driving force behind the PID evolution is the same in four studied countries. Our parsimonious microeconomic model, which links the change in PID only with one exogenous parameter - real GDP per capita, accurately predicts all studied features for the U.S. This study proves that our quantitative model, based on one first-order differential equation, is universal. For example, new observations in Canada, New Zealand, and the UK confirm our previous finding that the age of maximum mean income is defined by the root-square dependence on real GDP per capita.

q-fin.GN↗

arXiv2013

Does Banque de France control inflation and unemployment?

We re-estimate statistical properties and predictive power of a set of Phillips curves, which are expressed as linear and lagged relationships between the rates of inflation, unemployment, and change in labour force. For France, several relationships were estimated eight years ago. The change rate of labour force was used as a driving force of inflation and unemployment within the Phillips curve framework. The set of nested models starts with a simplistic version without autoregressive terms and one lagged term of explanatory variable. The lag is determined empirically together with all coefficients. The model is estimated using the Boundary Element Method (BEM) with the least squares method applied to the integral solutions of the differential equations. All models include one structural break might be associated with revisions to definitions and measurement procedures in the 1980s and 1990s as well as with the change in monetary policy in 1994-1995. For the GDP deflator, our original model provided a root mean squared forecast error (RMSFE) of 1.0% per year at a four-year horizon for the period between 1971 and 2004. The rate of CPI inflation is predicted with RMSFE=1.5% per year. For the naive (no change) forecast, RMSFE at the same time horizon is 2.95% and 3.3% per year, respectively. Our model outperforms the naive one by a factor of 2 to 3. The relationships for inflation were successfully tested for cointegration. We have formally estimated several vector error correction (VEC) models for two measures of inflation. At a four year horizon, the estimated VECMs provide significant statistical improvements on the results obtained by the BEM: RMSFE=0.8% per year for the GDP deflator and ~1.2% per year for CPI. For a two year horizon, the VECMs improve RMSFEs by a factor of 2, with the smallest RMSFE=0.5% per year for the GDP deflator.

q-fin.GN↗

arXiv2013

Inflation, unemployment, and labour force. Phillips curves and long-term projections for Austria

We model the rate of inflation and unemployment in Austria since the early 1960s within the Phillips/Fisher framework. The change in labour force is the driving force representing economic activity in the Phillips curve. For Austria, this macroeconomic variable was first tested as a predictor of inflation and unemployment in 2005 with the involved time series ended in 2003. Here we extend all series by nine new readings available since 2003 and re-estimate the previously estimated relationships between inflation, unemployment, and labour force. As before, a structural break is allowed in these relationships, which is related to numerous changes in definitions in the 1980s. The break year is estimated together with other model parameters by the Boundary Element Method with the LSQ fitting between observed and predicted integral curves. The precision of inflation prediction, as described by the root-mean-square (forecasting) error is by 20% to 70% better than that estimated by AR(1) model. The estimates of model forecasting error are available for those time series where the change in labour force leads by one (the GDP deflator) or two (CPI) years. For the whole period between 1965 and 2012 as well as for the intervals before and after the structural break (1986 for all inflation models) separately, our model is superior to the na\"ive forecasting, which in turn, is not worse than any other forecasting model. The level of statistical reliability and the predictive power of the link between inflation and labour force imply that the National Bank of Austria does not control inflation and unemployment beyond revisions to definitions. The labour force projection provided by Statistic Austria allows foreseeing inflation at a forty-year horizon: the rate of CPI inflation will hover around 1.3% and the GDP deflator will likely sink below zero between 2018 and 2034.

q-fin.GN↗