arXiv subjects

Ivan Gentile

Publications and source records attributed to Ivan Gentile.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Open-Source Large Language Models for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in ESG Domain

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting is critical for corporate accountability, with Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) offering strong potential to automate KPI extraction. However, open-source LLM performance in domain-specific ESG tasks remains insufficiently understood. This paper evaluates open-source LLMs in ESG contexts using a structured framework and evaluation resource based on 498 real-world ESG reports from EU-listed companies (2010-2024). We evaluate seven open-source models (2B to 30B parameters) -- glm-4.7-flash, nemotron-3-nano:4b, qwen3:4b-instruct, gemma3:4b, gemma4:e4b, gemma4:e2b, and ministral-3:8b -- using 100 persona-based synthetic QA pairs covering ESG information needs. System performance is assessed via RAGAS metrics, including contextual recall, precision, relevance, faithfulness, answer relevancy, and factual correctness. Results show notable performance variations across architectures. Retrieval performance is strong across models (context recall around 0.58-0.61, context precision around 0.78-0.81, context relevance 0.965-0.985). Generation diverges most on faithfulness (0.607-0.822) and least on answer relevancy (0.760-0.881): glm-4.7-flash leads in faithfulness (0.822), qwen3 in factual correctness (0.449), and ministral-3 in answer relevancy (0.881). Low overall factual correctness (0.387-0.449) highlights the need for domain-specific fine-tuning. This work provides data-driven guidance for deploying open-source models in ESG reporting.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Benchmarking Embedding Models for ESG Data

The use of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) data is fundamental for modern corporate accountability, sustainability reporting, and financial decision-making. Embedding models have emerged as a powerful approach for transforming unstructured ESG text into numerical representations suitable for downstream natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, their effectiveness in these ESG-specific tasks has not been systematically studied. In this paper, we construct a benchmark dataset specifically tailored to the ESG domain. We benchmark fourteen models, both open-source and closed-source embedding models, comparing their performance with respect to retrieval, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). The results demonstrate performance variations across different models, with Qwen3-based models achieving the highest overall performance. This study provides practical insights into which models are better suited for ESG RAG tasks.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

On the Properties of Feature Attribution for Supervised Contrastive Learning

Most Neural Networks (NNs) for classification are trained using Cross-Entropy as a loss function. This approach requires the model to have an explicit classification layer. However, there exist alternative approaches, such as Contrastive Learning (CL). Instead of explicitly operating a classification, CL has the NN produce an embedding space where projections of similar data are pulled together, while projections of dissimilar data are pushed apart. In the case of Supervised CL (SCL), labels are adopted as similarity criteria, thus creating an embedding space where the projected data points are well-clustered. SCL provides crucial advantages over CE with regard to adversarial robustness and out-of-distribution detection, thus making it a more natural choice in safety-critical scenarios. In the present paper, we empirically show that NNs for image classification trained with SCL present higher-quality feature attribution explanations than CL with regard to faithfulness, complexity, and continuity. These results reinforce previous findings about CL-based approaches when targeting more trustworthy and transparent NNs and can guide practitioners in the selection of training objectives targeting not only accuracy, but also transparency of the models.

cs.LG↗