Isiah M. Holt | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Systematic Effects of Hydrogen and Helium Atmosphere Mismatch on Radius Inference in PSR~J0740+6620-like Synthetic NICER Data

Constraints on neutron star radii provide insight into the properties of the cold, dense matter in their interiors. Previous studies using synthetic Neutron star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER) pulse waveform data have demonstrated that radius inferences derived therefrom are robust against several classes of modeling systematics. Here we explore the consequences of assuming the wrong atmospheric composition, using synthetic data based on the $\sim 2.1~M_\odot$ pulsar PSR~J0740$+$6620. We find that the assumption of a hydrogen atmosphere when the synthetic data assumed a helium atmosphere, or vice versa, produces little bias in the inferred radius at the spot-to-background ratio of the actual PSR~J0740$+$6620 data. However, when we increase the spot-to-background ratio by a factor of $\sim20$ while keeping the total number of counts fixed at the observed $\sim 5.5\times 10^5$, we find that composition mismatch can produce significantly biased radius estimates while remaining hidden inside a fit with statistically acceptable residuals. Even in these cases, the Bayesian evidence consistently identifies the correct atmospheric model. Our findings reinforce the importance of using the Bayesian evidence for model comparison and goodness-of-fit tests.

astro-ph.HE↗

arXiv2026

An Investigation of Systematic Effects from Background Priors on PSR J0740$+$6620 Radius Estimates using Synthetic NICER and XMM-Newton Data

Accurate and precise measurements of neutron star radii provide invaluable information about the cold, dense matter in neutron star cores. Analyses of synthetic X-ray pulse waveform data similar to the data obtained from non-accreting neutron stars using the Neutron star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER) have indicated that mass and radius estimates made using such data are robust against some systematic errors that may be made when modeling these data, such as errors in the assumed pattern of the thermal X-ray emission from the surface of these stars. A potentially important but so far unexplored source of systematic error is misparameterization of unmodulated background components, which can bias the inferred radius, particularly when data from different telescopes are used in the analysis. In this study, we investigate the effects of the background model on radius estimates by jointly analyzing synthetic NICER and XMM-Newton data, using the $\sim 2.1~M_\odot$ pulsar PSR~J0740$+$6620 as a prototypical example. Our analysis shows that even if the background assumed in the model underestimates the actual background by a factor of more than five, the resulting shift of the radius posterior from the true value of the radius corresponds to only $\sim1σ$. In all the cases we examined, the Bayesian evidence for the correct background model is greater than for the incorrect background model. These results add to the evidence that analyses of NICER-like data provide accurate measurements of neutron star radii when the statistical sampling is thorough and the model fits the data well.

astro-ph.HE↗