arXiv subjects

Isaac Corley

Publications and source records attributed to Isaac Corley.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Fields of the Planet: Field Boundary Mapping Beyond 10m

Field-boundary accuracy depends on the model, sensor resolution, label discretization, and evaluation procedure. Measuring the contribution of sensor resolution therefore requires a controlled comparison across sensors. We present Fields of the Planet (FTP), a 3 m PlanetScope companion to Fields of The World (FTW) containing 133,168 co-registered patch-window targets across 24 countries. FTP preserves FTW's vector polygons, seasonal windows, and dataset splits, enabling direct comparison with 10 m Sentinel-2. We first quantify the resolution ceiling by rasterizing and vectorizing the same ground-truth parcels at each resolution to determine which fields the label grid can represent. We evaluate predicted parcels with polygon-level and boundary metrics. With identical PRUE+ training and post-processing across sensors, plus an upsampled Sentinel-2 control, we isolate gains from image content. PlanetScope raises panoptic quality (PQ) from 21.0 to 35.5, improves PQ on sub-$0.5$ ha fields from 5.8 to 15.7, and reduces matched-boundary error from 18.6 m to 7.4 m. Pixel-level metrics understate this improvement, so field-boundary benchmarks should account for sensor resolution.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

PRUE: A Practical Recipe for Field Boundary Segmentation at Scale

Large-scale maps of field boundaries are essential for agricultural monitoring tasks. Existing deep learning approaches for satellite-based field mapping are sensitive to illumination, spatial scale, and changes in geographic location. We conduct the first systematic evaluation of segmentation and geospatial foundation models (GFMs) for global field boundary delineation using the Fields of The World (FTW) benchmark. We evaluate 18 models under unified experimental settings, showing that a U-Net semantic segmentation model outperforms instance-based and GFM alternatives on a suite of performance and deployment metrics. We propose a new segmentation approach that combines a U-Net backbone, composite loss functions, and targeted data augmentations to enhance performance and robustness under real-world conditions. Our model achieves a 76% IoU and 47% object-F1 on FTW, an increase of 6% and 9% over the previous baseline. Our approach provides a practical framework for reliable, scalable, and reproducible field boundary delineation across model design, training, and inference. We release all models and model-derived field boundary datasets for five countries.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Planetary Feature Fields are Scalable Earth Representations

Satellite observations, precomputed embeddings, and map products describe the same evolving Earth, yet are stored as independent, petabyte-scale data products. Their continued growth calls for compact representations of multiple products while preserving spatial and temporal detail. We introduce Planetary Feature Fields (PFFs), which exploit redundancy across data products by modeling them jointly as continuous functions of space and time at planetary scale. PFFs are spatially local explicit-implicit (hybrid) neural fields. Each field shares a factored feature volume---a decomposition of an explicit 3D grid with smaller factors---across products, while lightweight implicit decoders reconstruct individual products across multiple timesteps. PFFs reconstruct EO products over space and time more accurately than single-product fields at matched compression rates. At $1800\times$ compression relative to the uncompressed source data, reconstructed features retain approximately $90\%$ or more of the performance achieved with the original features on pixel-level segmentation, change detection, and patch-level classification tasks. PFFs can add new timesteps by extending their factored feature volumes and add new products by attaching new decoders, while leaving existing outputs unchanged. PFFs reduce end-to-end feature access latency by an order of magnitude relative to evaluated API and cloud-storage pipelines.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

MIND the Gap: A Geographic Implicit Neural Representation with Adjustable Spatial Scale

Geographic measurements are often sparse, leaving large areas without labels for the quantities we want to map. Geographic implicit neural representations (INRs) provide coordinate-based embeddings that can be combined with sparse labels to predict at unsampled locations without satellite imagery at inference. Yet existing INRs are largely evaluated with random holdouts, leaving their ability to generalize across larger geographic gaps unclear. We introduce Matryoshka Implicit Neural Distillation (MIND), a geographic INR whose spatial granularity can be adjusted after training. MIND distills several pretrained geospatial models using nested supervision at increasing embedding dimensions, dividing the representation into contiguous chunks. Early chunks capture broad spatial patterns, while later chunks add increasingly local variation. Downstream models can retain only the leading chunks or use our Chunked Penalty to reduce reliance on later chunks without retraining the INR. We also introduce CoordBench, comprising $52$ datasets and $78$ targets with both random and regional holdouts at multiple spatial scales. Across CoordBench, fine-scale features help most when labels are nearby, while smoother representations generalize better across larger geographic gaps. MIND with the Chunked Penalty achieves the highest aggregate regression and classification performance among tested INRs and the highest overall performance under regional holdout. These results show that geographic representations should be evaluated and adapted according to the spatial separation between labeled and prediction locations.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Chronosphere: Space-Time Tessellation of Local Climate Experts

We introduce Chronosphere, a spatio-temporal neural field that learns representations of climate. A central challenge in geographic representation learning is modeling environmental processes whose spatial and temporal complexity varies widely. Yet existing location encoders typically fix a single level of detail everywhere. Global bases such as spherical harmonics spread capacity uniformly across space and time. Localized bases resolve only predefined regions. Learned tessellations adapt, but are inefficient at representing higher frequencies. Chronosphere unifies these approaches, pairing an adaptive tessellation of learnable sites on the spacetime torus $S^2\times S^1$ with a shared bank of local basis functions. Both where capacity is placed and how much detail each region carries adapt to the data, across space and time. Trained to reconstruct climatology, Chronosphere matches or leads state-of-the-art location encoders across spatial and temporal tasks, with the largest gains under spatial and temporal transfer.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

No One Knows the State of the Art in Geospatial Foundation Models

Geospatial foundation models (GFMs) have been proposed as generalizable backbones for disaster response, land-cover mapping, food-security monitoring, and other high-stakes Earth-observation tasks. Yet the published work about these models does not give reviewers or users enough information to tell which model fits a given task. We argue that nobody knows what the current state of the art is in geospatial foundation models. The methods may be useful, but the GFM literature does not standardize evaluations, training and testing protocols, released weights, or pretraining controls well enough for anyone to compare or rank them. In a 152-paper audit, we find 46 cross-paper disagreements of at least 10 points for the same model, benchmark, and protocol; 94/126 papers with extractable pretraining data use a configuration no other paper uses; and 39% of GFM papers release no model weights. This lack of community standards can be solved. We propose six concrete expectations: named-license weight release, shared core evaluations, copied-versus-rerun baseline annotations, variance reporting, one shared evaluation harness, and data-vs-architecture-vs-algorithm controls. These gaps are a coordination failure, not a fault of any individual lab; the authors of this paper, like many others in the GFM community, have contributed to them. Rather than just critiquing the community, we aim to provide concrete steps toward a shared understanding of how to innovate GFMs.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Infra-Bench CLS: A Global, Open-Source Benchmark for Critical Infrastructure Classification with Earth Observation Foundation Models

Critical infrastructure location data is often incomplete and unevenly distributed globally, especially in developing regions. Earth observation foundation models are proposed as a new step in enabling us to more efficiently understand the natural and built environment, raising questions as to their effectiveness in performing challenging downstream tasks. Yet, foundation models remain largely untested for detecting and classifying the facility-scale critical infrastructure that underpins a range of important societal and economic functions. Subsequently, Infra-Bench CLS is introduced as a benchmark to test foundation models on 18,756 Sentinel-1 SAR and Sentinel-2 multispectral facility-scale critical infrastructure asset images covering seven continents and 13 infrastructure classes, with results reported for the 10 retained classes. Using linear probing and fine-tuning for two training dataset levels (1.0x and 0.3x), seven foundation models are evaluated (SatlasPretrain S2, SatlasPretrain S1, CROMA, Prithvi-EO-2.0, AlphaEarth Foundations, OlmoEarth v1.1-Base, and DINOv3 ViT-L/16). When comparing macro F1 scores to a ResNet-18 supervised baseline of 39.2 percent, the best foundation model achieved 57.9 percent, a 48 percent improvement. Top performing classes were airports (F1 85.3 percent), train stations (F1 82.1 percent), and data centers (F1 77.6 percent). By contrast, many of the power sector classes perform poorly (F1 27.5-46.2 percent). These findings suggest foundation models can enable superior critical infrastructure classification, but future work should evaluate performance on higher-resolution imagery, particularly for poorly performing sectors, such as power.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Beyond Accuracy: Assessing Calibration of Geospatial Foundation Models and Their Sensitivity to Distribution Shifts

Geospatial Foundation Models (GeoFMs) are most commonly ranked and selected by accuracy on standard benchmark conditions via averaged ranks. We show that this protocol is too narrow: the promised deployment in critical EO tasks requires further angles of analysis, mainly calibration, the agreement between a model's confidence and its correctness. Across 16 frozen encoders, four classification and five segmentation datasets, and two orthogonal stress axes, every encoder degrades as corruption intensifies, and the ranking changes as well. Across the four classification benchmarks, EO-pretrained and ImageNet-pretrained encoders are indistinguishable on clean accuracy and clean calibration, and EO pretraining provides no more stability under shift than ImageNet pretraining. Under shift the GeoFMs drift further into overconfidence than the ImageNet-pretrained encoders, at every grade and in every corruption family. A centered kernel alignment (CKA) analysis ties this to representational rigidity: EO-pretrained embeddings move less under corruption while losing just as much task information and remaining overconfident. We apply three commonly explored uncertainty quantification methods and find that temperature scaling and deep ensembles cannot counteract the degradation, while a Gaussian-process probe roughly halves ECE under severe cloud only by tripling it on clean data. In selective prediction experiments, we find that confidence-based abstention cannot defer around confidently wrong predictions, and advocate that benchmark rankings and evaluations should therefore operate across a multitude of conditions and metrics to more holistically evaluate model development progress and close the gap to real world deployment scenarios.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

HeatCast: A Benchmark for Neighborhood-Scale LST Forecasting across 124 U.S. Cities

Land Surface Temperature (LST) is a widely used satellite-derived measure of urban surface heat, but there is no shared benchmark for forecasting it at 30 m. Prior studies usually cover one to three cities, use kilometer-scale products, or do not release data and code. We introduce HeatCast, a Landsat-based benchmark for monthly LST forecasting across 124 U.S. cities from 2013 through June 2025. HeatCast contains 30 m monthly tiles with LST, elevation, surfacereflectance RGB, three spectral indices, broadband albedo, quality masks, and Local Climate Zone (LCZ) labels, together with a fixed temporal split, LCZ-stratified metrics, and a reference evaluation harness. We evaluate a CNN+LSTM and Earthformer on next-month forecasting, where Earthformer reaches 7.74 K RMSE against 10.42 K for the CNN+LSTM. Forecasting from the eight nonLST channels alone reaches 7.72 K, against 8.15 K from LST history and 8.68 K from RGB. The data, code, and weights are released under MIT at https://doi.org/10.57967/hf/9889.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Are Pretrained Image Matchers Good Enough for SAR-Optical Satellite Registration?

Cross-modal optical--SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) registration is a bottleneck in remote-sensing disaster response. Modern image matchers are developed and benchmarked almost exclusively on natural-image domains. We evaluate twenty-four pretrained matcher configurations in a zero-shot setting, with no fine-tuning or domain adaptation on satellite or SAR data. The evaluation spans SpaceNet9 and two additional cross-modal benchmarks under a deterministic protocol that uses tiled large-image inference, robust geometric filtering, and tie-point-grounded metrics. Our results show uneven transfer: matchers with explicit cross-modal training do not uniformly outperform those without it. XoFTR (trained for visible--thermal matching) and RoMa achieve the lowest reported mean tie-point error at $3.0$ px on the labeled SpaceNet9 training scenes. RoMa achieves this result \emph{without any cross-modal training}. MatchAnything-ELoFTR ($3.4$ px), trained on synthetic cross-modal pairs, is close behind. XoFTR also runs roughly an order of magnitude faster than the RoMa family ($0.4$ s vs. $5.0$ s per pair). RoMa's performance is consistent with the hypothesis that frozen DINOv2 features confer robustness to large appearance shifts. Deployment protocol choices (geometry model, tile size, inlier gating) change mean error by up to $33\times$ for a single matcher. This shift can exceed the effect of swapping matchers within our evaluated protocol ablations. Affine geometry alone reduces mean error from $12.3$ to $9.7$ px.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

The first global agricultural field boundary map at 10m resolution

The agricultural field is the natural unit at which crops are planted, managed, regulated, and reported, yet most global remote-sensing products for agriculture are only available at the pixel level. While some high-quality field-level data products exist, they come from parcel registries covering only parts of Europe or from ML-derived products for individual countries. No openly available, globally consistent map of agricultural field boundaries exists to date. Here we present the first global field boundary dataset at 10\,m resolution for the years 2024 and 2025, comprising 3.17 billion remote-sensing field polygons (1.62 B in 2024 and 1.55 B in 2025) across 241 countries and territories, produced by applying a U-Net segmentation model trained on the Fields of The World dataset to cloud-free Sentinel-2 mosaics. Validated against ground-truth field boundaries in 24 countries, the map achieved a mean pixel-level recall of 0.85 with 14 countries exceeding 0.90. Evaluation against full-country ground-truth datasets in Austria, Latvia, and Finland yielded F1 scores of 0.89, 0.88, and 0.74, respectively. Because reference data for global validation is inherently incomplete, we accompanied the map with a 500 m confidence layer that identifies regions where predictions are reliable. We release the dataset openly as three global maps: the confidence-thresholded default field boundary dataset, the full unfiltered dataset, and the continuous-valued confidence raster. These maps provide the first globally consistent field-level unit of analysis for crop monitoring, food security, and downstream agricultural science.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

From Pixels to Patches: Pooling Strategies for Earth Embeddings

Geospatial foundation models increasingly expose pixel-level embedding products that can be downloaded and reused without access to the underlying encoder. In this setting, downstream tasks with patch- or region-level labels require a post-hoc aggregation step that maps dense pixel embeddings to a single representation. The default choice, mean pooling, discards within-patch variability and can underperform under spatial distribution shift. To study this setting, we introduce EuroSAT-Embed: 81,000 embedding GeoTIFFs derived from three foundation models: AlphaEarth, OlmoEarth, and Tessera. Using these fixed embedding products, we benchmark 11 training-free pooling methods and 2 train-set-fitted baselines under both random and geographically disjoint test splits. Richer pooling schemes reduce the geographic generalization gap by over 50% relative to mean pooling and improve accuracy by up to 6% on spatial splits. We recommend a three-tier strategy: (1) mean as a baseline, (2) stats pooling (min/max/mean/std) as the default at 4x the embedding dimension, and (3) covariance pooling for peak accuracy. Across all three embedding products, simple distributional statistics improve spatial-split performance over mean pooling.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Earth Embeddings as Products: Taxonomy, Ecosystem, and Standardized Access

Geospatial Foundation Models (GFMs) provide powerful representations, but high compute costs hinder their widespread use. Pre-computed embedding data products offer a practical "frozen" alternative, yet they currently exist in a fragmented ecosystem of incompatible formats and resolutions. This lack of standardization creates an engineering bottleneck that prevents meaningful model comparison and reproducibility. We formalize this landscape through a three-layer taxonomy: Data, Tools, and Value. We survey existing products to identify interoperability barriers. To bridge this gap, we extend TorchGeo with a unified API that standardizes the loading and querying of diverse embedding products. By treating embeddings as first-class geospatial datasets, we decouple downstream analysis from model-specific engineering, providing a roadmap for more transparent and accessible Earth observation workflows.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Fields of The World: A Field Guide for Extracting Agricultural Field Boundaries

Field boundary maps are a building block for agricultural data products and support crop monitoring, yield estimation, and disease estimation. This tutorial presents the Fields of The World (FTW) ecosystem: a benchmark of 1.6M field polygons across 24 countries, pre-trained segmentation models, and command-line inference tools. We provide two notebooks that cover (1) local-scale field boundary extraction with crop classification and forest loss attribution, and (2) country-scale inference using cloud-optimized data. We use MOSAIKS random convolutional features and FTW derived field boundaries to map crop type at the field level and report macro F1 scores of 0.65--0.75 for crop type classification with limited labels. Finally, we show how to explore pre-computed predictions over five countries (4.76M km\textsuperscript{2}), with median predicted field areas from 0.06 ha (Rwanda) to 0.28 ha (Switzerland).

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

HydroChronos: Forecasting Decades of Surface Water Change

Forecasting surface water dynamics is crucial for water resource management and climate change adaptation. However, the field lacks comprehensive datasets and standardized benchmarks. In this paper, we introduce HydroChronos, a large-scale, multi-modal spatiotemporal dataset for surface water dynamics forecasting designed to address this gap. We couple the dataset with three forecasting tasks. The dataset includes over three decades of aligned Landsat 5 and Sentinel-2 imagery, climate data, and Digital Elevation Models for diverse lakes and rivers across Europe, North America, and South America. We also propose AquaClimaTempo UNet, a novel spatiotemporal architecture with a dedicated climate data branch, as a strong benchmark baseline. Our model significantly outperforms a Persistence baseline for forecasting future water dynamics by +14% and +11% F1 across change detection and direction of change classification tasks, and by +0.1 MAE on the magnitude of change regression. Finally, we conduct an Explainable AI analysis to identify the key climate variables and input channels that influence surface water change, providing insights to inform and guide future modeling efforts.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

InspectVLM: Unified in Theory, Unreliable in Practice

Unified vision-language models (VLMs) promise to streamline computer vision pipelines by reframing multiple visual tasks such as classification, detection, and keypoint localization within a single language-driven interface. This architecture is particularly appealing in industrial inspection, where managing disjoint task-specific models introduces complexity, inefficiency, and maintenance overhead. In this paper, we critically evaluate the viability of this unified paradigm using InspectVLM, a Florence-2-based VLM trained on InspectMM, our new large-scale multimodal, multitask inspection dataset. While InspectVLM performs competitively on image-level classification and structured keypoint tasks, we find that it fails to match traditional ResNet-based models in core inspection metrics. Notably, the model exhibits brittle behavior under low prompt variability, produces degenerate outputs for fine-grained object detection, and frequently defaults to memorized language responses regardless of visual input. Our findings suggest that while language-driven unification offers conceptual elegance, current VLMs lack the visual grounding and robustness necessary for deployment in precision critical industrial inspections.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Landsat-Bench: Datasets and Benchmarks for Landsat Foundation Models

The Landsat program offers over 50 years of globally consistent Earth imagery. However, the lack of benchmarks for this data constrains progress towards Landsat-based Geospatial Foundation Models (GFM). In this paper, we introduce Landsat-Bench, a suite of three benchmarks with Landsat imagery that adapt from existing remote sensing datasets -- EuroSAT-L, BigEarthNet-L, and LC100-L. We establish baseline and standardized evaluation methods across both common architectures and Landsat foundation models pretrained on the SSL4EO-L dataset. Notably, we provide evidence that SSL4EO-L pretrained GFMs extract better representations for downstream tasks in comparison to ImageNet, including performance gains of +4% OA and +5.1% mAP on EuroSAT-L and BigEarthNet-L.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Aerial Infrared Health Monitoring of Solar Photovoltaic Farms at Scale

Solar photovoltaic (PV) farms represent a major source of global renewable energy generation, yet their true operational efficiency often remains unknown at scale. In this paper, we present a comprehensive, data-driven framework for large-scale airborne infrared inspection of North American solar installations. Leveraging high-resolution thermal imagery, we construct and curate a geographically diverse dataset encompassing thousands of PV sites, enabling machine learning-based detection and localization of defects that are not detectable in the visible spectrum. Our pipeline integrates advanced image processing, georeferencing, and airborne thermal infrared anomaly detection to provide rigorous estimates of performance losses. We highlight practical considerations in aerial data collection, annotation methodologies, and model deployment across a wide range of environmental and operational conditions. Our work delivers new insights into the reliability of large-scale solar assets and serves as a foundation for ongoing research on performance trends, predictive maintenance, and scalable analytics in the renewable energy sector.

cs.CV↗