arXiv subjects

Hwan Kim

Publications and source records attributed to Hwan Kim.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2024

Toward Reasoning on the Boundary: A Mixup-based Approach for Graph Anomaly Detection

While GNN-based detection methods excel at identifying overt outliers, they often struggle with boundary anomalies -- subtly camouflaged nodes that are difficult to distinguish from normal instances. This limitation highlights a fundamental gap in the reasoning capabilities of existing methods. We attribute this issue to the reliance of standard Graph Contrastive Learning (GCL) on easy negatives, which fosters the learning of simplistic decision boundaries. To address this issue, we propose ANOMIX, a framework that synthesizes informative hard negatives by linearly interpolating representations of normal and abnormal subgraphs. This graph mixup strategy intentionally populates the decision boundary with hard-to-detect samples. Through targeted experimental analysis, we demonstrate that ANOMIX successfully separates these boundary anomalies where state-of-the-art baselines fail, as shown by a clear distinction in the score distributions for these challenging cases. These findings suggest that synthesizing hard negatives via mixup is a potent strategy for refining GNN representation space, which in turn enhances its reasoning capacity for more robust and reliable graph anomaly detection. Code is available at https://github.com/missinghwan/ANOMIX.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2023

Label-based Graph Augmentation with Metapath for Graph Anomaly Detection

Graph anomaly detection has attracted considerable attention from various domain ranging from network security to finance in recent years. Due to the fact that labeling is very costly, existing methods are predominately developed in an unsupervised manner. However, the detected anomalies may be found out uninteresting instances due to the absence of prior knowledge regarding the anomalies looking for. This issue may be solved by using few labeled anomalies as prior knowledge. In real-world scenarios, we can easily obtain few labeled anomalies. Efficiently leveraging labelled anomalies as prior knowledge is crucial for graph anomaly detection; however, this process remains challenging due to the inherently limited number of anomalies available. To address the problem, we propose a novel approach that leverages metapath to embed actual connectivity patterns between anomalous and normal nodes. To further efficiently exploit context information from metapath-based anomaly subgraph, we present a new framework, Metapath-based Graph Anomaly Detection (MGAD), incorporating GCN layers in both the dual-encoders and decoders to efficiently propagate context information between abnormal and normal nodes. Specifically, MGAD employs GNN-based graph autoencoder as its backbone network. Moreover, dual encoders capture the complex interactions and metapath-based context information between labeled and unlabeled nodes both globally and locally. Through a comprehensive set of experiments conducted on seven real-world networks, this paper demonstrates the superiority of the MGAD method compared to state-of-the-art techniques. The code is available at https://github.com/missinghwan/MGAD.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2022

Graph Anomaly Detection with Graph Neural Networks: Current Status and Challenges

Graphs are used widely to model complex systems, and detecting anomalies in a graph is an important task in the analysis of complex systems. Graph anomalies are patterns in a graph that do not conform to normal patterns expected of the attributes and/or structures of the graph. In recent years, graph neural networks (GNNs) have been studied extensively and have successfully performed difficult machine learning tasks in node classification, link prediction, and graph classification thanks to the highly expressive capability via message passing in effectively learning graph representations. To solve the graph anomaly detection problem, GNN-based methods leverage information about the graph attributes (or features) and/or structures to learn to score anomalies appropriately. In this survey, we review the recent advances made in detecting graph anomalies using GNN models. Specifically, we summarize GNN-based methods according to the graph type (i.e., static and dynamic), the anomaly type (i.e., node, edge, subgraph, and whole graph), and the network architecture (e.g., graph autoencoder, graph convolutional network). To the best of our knowledge, this survey is the first comprehensive review of graph anomaly detection methods based on GNNs.

cs.LG↗