A normalization issue in a transmitted form of Bloch's diamond formula: anti-invariant subgroup versus regulator quotient
Bloch's regulator formula for an elliptic curve is often quoted with a generator of the anti-invariant subgroup $H_1(E,\mathbb{Z})^-$ and coefficient $1$ in front of the elliptic dilogarithm of the diamond product. We compare this wording with Brunault's published intersection-product formula. The natural map from the anti-invariant subgroup to the regulator quotient $H_1(E,\mathbb{Z})/H_1(E,\mathbb{Z})^+$ has index $1$ when $E(\mathbb{R})$ has two components and index $2$ when it has one. Thus, up to orientation, the coefficient is $1$ for a quotient generator and $ι(E)\in\{1,2\}$ for a subgroup generator. This is an elementary consequence of the published formula, not a new regulator theorem. We illustrate the distinction on 11.a3 using an externally proved regulator anchor and the Brunault--Bertin special values, and on 20.a4 by high-precision numerical integration. We also correct our earlier quotation of Touafek: his printed identity is $πr=D_E((f)\diamond(g))$, with $r=(2π)^{-1}\int_{γ^-}η$. It is compatible with the subgroup normalization when $Δ<0$; when $Δ>0$ the corresponding coefficient is $1/2$, up to orientation. We do not reassess his isogeny theorem or his final exotic relation here. No new proof of Boyd's conductor-11 split-integral identity is included.