arXiv subjects

Huihuang Lin

Publications and source records attributed to Huihuang Lin.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

CASH: A Capability-Aware Subsidy Harness for Advertiser Subsidy Allocation

Advertising platforms subsidize advertisers through billing discounts, and Advertiser Subsidy Allocation (ASA) chooses a subsidy level for every account to maximize total discounted revenue under a platform-wide subsidy-rate constraint. In practice, operators configure these subsidies from business rules, advertiser tiers and operating goals. Such configuration draws on rich business experience, yet as the advertiser base grows, tier-level policies can neither resolve how individual accounts respond across subsidy levels nor allocate a shared budget at the granularity of single accounts. We propose CASH, a Capability-Aware Subsidy Harness for ASA. CASH pairs a knowledge-guided large language model (LLM) with a data-driven numerical response model, learns from realized outcomes where each is locally reliable across accounts and subsidy levels, and turns this reliability into explicit capability licenses that govern source selection, agent review and budget allocation. Its Expected Policy Coverage Gain (EPCG) directs a limited feedback budget toward evidence expected to expand high-value reliable coverage, and the resulting feedback further improves the numerical model and updates capability estimates. In a one-month online experiment with CASH serving 60% of a large-scale advertising platform's traffic, CASH raises revenue per account by 15.35% and ADVV by 19.86% over Control at an essentially unchanged subsidy rate, with further gains in revenue quality, LTV and retention.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

From Understanding to Action: Feedback-Grounded Policy Discovery for Generative Recommendation

Semantic-ID-based generative recommenders enable efficient next-item generation, but their item-level supervision mainly captures behavioral co-occurrence and local transitions. Large language models (LLMs) can complement these models by reasoning over heterogeneous interaction histories to understand the user's current demand. However, LLMs are not inherently trained with recommendation-specific outcome feedback, and linguistically plausible reasoning therefore does not necessarily lead to effective recommendation decisions. We term this mismatch the Understanding-Action Gap. Accordingly, we distinguish intent knowledge, which captures the user's current demand, from policy knowledge, which specifies the recommendation direction and rejection boundary under that demand. To bridge this gap, we propose a feedback-driven agent framework that first induces task-oriented intent and then discovers recommendation policies according to their incremental utility over an intent-only baseline. Candidate policies are evaluated and refined using outcome-derived feedback rather than linguistic plausibility. We further transfer the resulting intent and policy knowledge into two latent tokens of a lightweight Semantic-ID generator through dual-space relational distillation, enabling LLM-free online inference. Experiments on public benchmarks show consistent improvements over baselines, while large-scale online A/B tests achieve gains of 4.506% in Revenue and 4.621% in ADVV.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

AgentX: Towards Agent-Driven Self-Iteration of Industrial Recommender Systems

Recommendation algorithm iteration is moving from an artisanal, engineer-bound process toward an industrialized research loop, but this transition remains blocked by a structural execution bottleneck: the idea-to-launch cycle still depends on human engineers to generate hypotheses, modify production code, launch A/B experiments, and attribute online results. Innovation therefore scales linearly with headcount rather than compounding with evidence, compute, and accumulated experimental knowledge. We present AgentX, a production-deployed multi-agent system that fundamentally restructures this production function. AgentX operates as a self-evolving development engine: it autonomously generates, implements, evaluates, and learns from recommendation experiments at a scale and pace that no manual workflow can sustain. The system orchestrates four tightly coupled stages in a closed loop. A Brainstorm Agent synthesizes evidence from historical experiments, system architecture, data analysis, and external research into ranked, executable proposals. A Developing Agent translates each proposal into production-ready code through repository-grounded generation and multi-dimensional reliability verification. An Evaluation Agent conducts safe online rollout with guardrail-vetoed A/B judgment, converting both successes and failures into structured knowledge assets. A Harness Evolution layer (SGPO) then distills execution trajectories into semantic-gradient updates that continuously sharpen the agents themselves -- making the system not merely automated, but self-improving.

cs.AI↗