arXiv subjects

Hugo Gilbert

Publications and source records attributed to Hugo Gilbert.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2023

Robust Ordinal Regression for Subsets Comparisons with Interactions

This paper is dedicated to a robust ordinal method for learning the preferences of a decision maker between subsets. The decision model, derived from Fishburn and LaValle (1996) and whose parameters we learn, is general enough to be compatible with any strict weak order on subsets, thanks to the consideration of possible interactions between elements. Moreover, we accept not to predict some preferences if the available preference data are not compatible with a reliable prediction. A predicted preference is considered reliable if all the simplest models (Occam's razor) explaining the preference data agree on it. Following the robust ordinal regression methodology, our predictions are based on an uncertainty set encompassing the possible values of the model parameters. We define a robust ordinal dominance relation between subsets and we design a procedure to determine whether this dominance relation holds. Numerical tests are provided on synthetic and real-world data to evaluate the richness and reliability of the preference predictions made.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2023

Constrained Serial Dictatorships can be Fair

When allocating indivisible items to agents, it is known that the only strategyproof mechanisms that satisfy a set of rather mild conditions are constrained serial dictatorships: given a fixed order over agents, at each step the designated agent chooses a given number of items (depending on her position in the sequence). Agents who come earlier in the sequence have a larger choice of items; however, this advantage can be compensated by a higher number of items received by those who come later. How to balance priority in the sequence and number of items received is a nontrivial question. We use a previous model, parameterized by a mapping from ranks to scores, a social welfare functional, and a distribution over preference profiles. For several meaningful choices of parameters, we show that the optimal sequence can be computed exactly in polynomial time or approximated using sampling. Our results hold for several probabilistic models on preference profiles, with an emphasis on the Plackett-Luce model. We conclude with experimental results showing how the optimal sequence is impacted by various parameters.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Measuring a Priori Voting Power -- Taking Delegations Seriously

We introduce new power indices to measure the a priori voting power of voters in liquid democracy elections where an underlying network restricts delegations. We argue that our power indices are natural extensions of the standard Penrose-Banzhaf index in simple voting games. We show that computing the criticality of a voter is #P-hard even when voting weights are polynomially-bounded in the size of the instance. However, for specific settings, such as when the underlying network is a bipartite or complete graph, recursive formulas can compute these indices for weighted voting games in pseudo-polynomial time. We highlight their theoretical properties and provide numerical results to illustrate how restricting the possible delegations can alter voters' voting power.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2022

Cautious Learning of Multiattribute Preferences

This paper is dedicated to a cautious learning methodology for predicting preferences between alternatives characterized by binary attributes (formally, each alternative is seen as a subset of attributes). By "cautious", we mean that the model learned to represent the multi-attribute preferences is general enough to be compatible with any strict weak order on the alternatives, and that we allow ourselves not to predict some preferences if the data collected are not compatible with a reliable prediction. A predicted preference will be considered reliable if all the simplest models (following Occam's razor principle) explaining the training data agree on it. Predictions are based on an ordinal dominance relation between alternatives [Fishburn and LaValle, 1996]. The dominance relation relies on an uncertainty set encompassing the possible values of the parameters of the multi-attribute utility function. Numerical tests are provided to evaluate the richness and the reliability of the predictions made.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2022

Budgeted Out-tree Maximization with Submodular Prizes

We consider a variant of the prize collecting Steiner tree problem in which we are given a \emph{directed graph} $D=(V,A)$, a monotone submodular prize function $p:2^V \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+ \cup \{0\}$, a cost function $c:V \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}^{+}$, a root vertex $r \in V$, and a budget $B$. The aim is to find an out-subtree $T$ of $D$ rooted at $r$ that costs at most $B$ and maximizes the prize function. We call this problem \emph{Directed Rooted Submodular Tree} (\textbf{DRSO}). Very recently, Ghuge and Nagarajan [SODA\ 2020] gave an optimal quasi-polynomial-time $O\left(\frac{\log n'}{\log \log n'}\right)$-approximation algorithm, where $n'$ is the number of vertices in an optimal solution, for the case in which the costs are associated to the edges. In this paper, we give a polynomial-time algorithm for \textbf{DRSO} that guarantees an approximation factor of $O(\sqrt{B}/\epsilon^3)$ at the cost of a budget violation of a factor $1+\epsilon$, for any $\epsilon \in (0,1]$. The same result holds for the edge-cost case, to the best of our knowledge this is the first polynomial-time approximation algorithm for this case. We further show that the unrooted version of \textbf{DRSO} can be approximated to a factor of $O(\sqrt{B})$ without budget violation, which is an improvement over the factor $O(\Delta \sqrt{B})$ given in~[Kuo et al.\ IEEE/ACM\ Trans.\ Netw.\ 2015] for the undirected and unrooted case, where $\Delta$ is the maximum degree of the graph. Finally, we provide some new/improved approximation bounds for several related problems, including the additive-prize version of \textbf{DRSO}, the maximum budgeted connected set cover problem, and the budgeted sensor cover problem.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Computation and Bribery of Voting Power in Delegative Simple Games

Following Zhang and Grossi~(AAAI 2021), we study in more depth a variant of weighted voting games in which agents' weights are induced by a transitive support structure. This class of simple games is notably well suited to study the relative importance of agents in the liquid democracy framework. We first propose a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm to compute the Banzhaf and Shapley-Shubik indices for this class of game. Then, we study a bribery problem, in which one tries to maximize/minimize the voting power/weight of a given agent by changing the support structure under a budget constraint. We show that these problems are computationally hard and provide several parameterized complexity results.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

When Can Liquid Democracy Unveil the Truth?

In this paper, we investigate the so-called ODP-problem that has been formulated by Caragiannis and Micha [10]. Here, we are in a setting with two election alternatives out of which one is assumed to be correct. In ODP, the goal is to organise the delegations in the social network in order to maximize the probability that the correct alternative, referred to as ground truth, is elected. While the problem is known to be computationally hard, we strengthen existing hardness results by providing a novel strong approximation hardness result: For any positive constant $C$, we prove that, unless $P=NP$, there is no polynomial-time algorithm for ODP that achieves an approximation guarantee of $\alpha \ge (\ln n)^{-C}$, where $n$ is the number of voters. The reduction designed for this result uses poorly connected social networks in which some voters suffer from misinformation. Interestingly, under some hypothesis on either the accuracies of voters or the connectivity of the network, we obtain a polynomial-time $1/2$-approximation algorithm. This observation proves formally that the connectivity of the social network is a key feature for the efficiency of the liquid democracy paradigm. Lastly, we run extensive simulations and observe that simple algorithms (working either in a centralized or decentralized way) outperform direct democracy on a large class of instances. Overall, our contributions yield new insights on the question in which situations liquid democracy can be beneficial.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2020

Group-Harmonic and Group-Closeness Maximization -- Approximation and Engineering

Centrality measures characterize important nodes in networks. Efficiently computing such nodes has received a lot of attention. When considering the generalization of computing central groups of nodes, challenging optimization problems occur. In this work, we study two such problems, group-harmonic maximization and group-closeness maximization both from a theoretical and from an algorithm engineering perspective. On the theoretical side, we obtain the following results. For group-harmonic maximization, unless $P=NP$, there is no polynomial-time algorithm that achieves an approximation factor better than $1-1/e$ (directed) and $1-1/(4e)$ (undirected), even for unweighted graphs. On the positive side, we show that a greedy algorithm achieves an approximation factor of $\lambda(1-2/e)$ (directed) and $\lambda(1-1/e)/2$ (undirected), where $\lambda$ is the ratio of minimal and maximal edge weights. For group-closeness maximization, the undirected case is $NP$-hard to be approximated to within a factor better than $1-1/(e+1)$ and a constant approximation factor is achieved by a local-search algorithm. For the directed case, however, we show that, for any $\epsilon<1/2$, the problem is $NP$-hard to be approximated within a factor of $4|V|^{-\epsilon}$. From the algorithm engineering perspective, we provide efficient implementations of the above greedy and local search algorithms. In our experimental study we show that, on small instances where an optimum solution can be computed in reasonable time, the quality of both the greedy and the local search algorithms come very close to the optimum. On larger instances, our local search algorithms yield results with superior quality compared to existing greedy and local search solutions, at the cost of additional running time. We thus advocate local search for scenarios where solution quality is of highest concern.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Fairness in Influence Maximization through Randomization

The influence maximization paradigm has been used by researchers in various fields in order to study how information spreads in social networks. While previously the attention was mostly on efficiency, more recently fairness issues have been taken into account in this scope. In this paper, we propose to use randomization as a mean for achieving fairness. Similar to previous works like Fish et al. (WWW '19) and Tsang et al. (IJCAI '19), we study the maximin criterion for (group) fairness. In contrast to their work however, we model the problem in such a way that, when choosing the seed sets, probabilistic strategies are possible rather than only deterministic ones. We introduce two different variants of this probabilistic problem, one that entails probabilistic strategies over nodes (node-based problem) and a second one that entails probabilistic strategies over sets of nodes (set-based problem). While the original deterministic problem involving the maximin criterion has been shown to be inapproximable, interestingly, we show that both probabilistic variants permit approximation algorithms that achieve a constant multiplicative factor of 1-1/e plus an additive arbitrarily small error that is due to the simulation of the information spread. For an experimental study, we provide implementations of multiplicative-weight routines for both problems and compare the achieved fairness values to existing methods. Maybe non-surprisingly, we show that the ex-ante values of the computed probabilistic strategies are significantly larger than the (ex-post) fairness values of previous methods. This indicates that studying fairness via randomization is a worthwhile path to follow. Interestingly and maybe more surprisingly, we observe that even the ex-post fairness values computed by our routines, dominate over the fairness achieved by previous methods on most of the instances tested.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2020

Maximizing Influence-based Group Shapley Centrality

One key problem in network analysis is the so-called influence maximization problem, which consists in finding a set $S$ of at most $k$ seed users, in a social network, maximizing the spread of information from $S$. This paper studies a related but slightly different problem: We want to find a set $S$ of at most $k$ seed users that maximizes the spread of information, when $S$ is added to an already pre-existing - but unknown - set of seed users $T$. We consider such scenario to be very realistic. Assume a central entity wants to spread a piece of news, while having a budget to influence $k$ users. This central authority may know that some users are already aware of the information and are going to spread it anyhow. The identity of these users being however completely unknown. We model this optimization problem using the Group Shapley value, a well-founded concept from cooperative game theory. While the standard influence maximization problem is easy to approximate within a factor $1-1/e-\epsilon$ for any $\epsilon>0$, assuming common computational complexity conjectures, we obtain strong hardness of approximation results for the problem at hand in this paper. Maybe most prominently, we show that it cannot be approximated within $1/n^{o(1)}$ under the Gap Exponential Time Hypothesis. Hence, it is unlikely to achieve anything better than a polynomial factor approximation. Nevertheless, we show that a greedy algorithm can achieve a factor of $\frac{1-1/e}{k}-\epsilon$ for any $\epsilon>0$, showing that not all is lost in settings where $k$ is bounded.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2019

Beyond Pairwise Comparisons in Social Choice: A Setwise Kemeny Aggregation Problem

In this paper, we advocate the use of setwise contests for aggregating a set of input rankings into an output ranking. We propose a generalization of the Kemeny rule where one minimizes the number of k-wise disagreements instead of pairwise disagreements (one counts 1 disagreement each time the top choice in a subset of alternatives of cardinality at most k differs between an input ranking and the output ranking). After an algorithmic study of this k-wise Kemeny aggregation problem, we introduce a k-wise counterpart of the majority graph. This graph reveals useful to divide the aggregation problem into several sub-problems, which enables to speed up the exact computation of a consensus ranking. By introducing a k-wise counterpart of the Spearman distance, we also provide a 2-approximation algorithm for the k-wise Kemeny aggregation problem. We conclude with numerical tests.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2019

Parameterized Complexity of Manipulating Sequential Allocation

The sequential allocation protocol is a simple and popular mechanism to allocate indivisible goods, in which the agents take turns to pick the items according to a predefined sequence. While this protocol is not strategy-proof, it has been shown recently that finding a successful manipulation for an agent is an NP-hard problem (Aziz et al., 2017). Conversely, it is also known that finding an optimal manipulation can be solved in polynomial time in a few cases: if there are only two agents or if the manipulator has a binary or a lexicographic utility function. In this work, we take a parameterized approach to provide several new complexity results on this manipulation problem. More precisely, we give a complete picture of its parameterized complexity w.r.t. the following three parameters: the number $n$ of agents, the number $\mu(a_1)$ of times the manipulator $a_1$ picks in the picking sequence, and the maximum range $\mathtt{rg}^{\max}$ of an item. This third parameter is a correlation measure on the preference rankings of the agents. In particular, we show that the problem of finding an optimal manipulation can be solved in polynomial time if $n$ or $\mu(a_1)$ is a constant, and that it is fixed-parameter tractable w.r.t. $\mathtt{rg}^{\max}$ and $n+\mu(a_1)$. Interestingly enough, we show that w.r.t. the single parameters $n$ and $\mu(a_1)$ it is W[1]-hard. Moreover, we provide an integer program and a dynamic programming scheme to solve the manipulation problem and we show that a single manipulator can increase the utility of her bundle by a multiplicative factor which is at most 2.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2019

Balancing spreads of influence in a social network

The personalization of our news consumption on social media has a tendency to reinforce our pre-existing beliefs instead of balancing our opinions. This finding is a concern for the health of our democracies which rely on an access to information providing diverse viewpoints. To tackle this issue from a computational perspective, Garimella et al. (NIPS'17) modeled the spread of these viewpoints, also called campaigns, using the well-known independent cascade model and studied an optimization problem that aims at balancing information exposure in a social network when two opposing campaigns propagate in the network. The objective in their $NP$-hard optimization problem is to maximize the number of people that are exposed to either both or none of the viewpoints. For two different settings, one corresponding to a model where campaigns spread in a correlated manner, and a second one, where the two campaigns spread in a heterogeneous manner, they provide constant ratio approximation algorithms. In this paper, we investigate a more general formulation of this problem. That is, we assume that $\mu$ different campaigns propagate in a social network and we aim to maximize the number of people that are exposed to either $\nu$ or none of the campaigns, where $\mu\ge\nu\ge2$. We provide dedicated approximation algorithms for both the correlated and heterogeneous settings. Interestingly, for the heterogeneous setting with $\nu\ge 3$, we give a reduction leading to several approximation hardness results. Maybe most importantly, we obtain that the problem cannot be approximated within a factor of $n^{-g(n)}$ for any $g(n)=o(1)$ assuming Gap-ETH, denoting with $n$ the number of nodes in the social network. For $\nu \ge 4$, there is no $n^{-\epsilon}$-approximation algorithm if a certain class of one-way functions exists, where $\epsilon > 0$ is a given constant which depends on $\nu$.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2019

The Convergence of Iterative Delegations in Liquid Democracy in a Social Network

Liquid democracy is a collective decision making paradigm which lies between direct and representative democracy. One of its main features is that voters can delegate their votes in a transitive manner such that: A delegates to B and B delegates to C leads to A indirectly delegates to C. These delegations can be effectively empowered by implementing liquid democracy in a social network, so that voters can delegate their votes to any of their neighbors in the network. However, it is uncertain that such a delegation process will lead to a stable state where all voters are satisfied with the people representing them. We study the stability (w.r.t. voters preferences) of the delegation process in liquid democracy and model it as a game in which the players are the voters and the strategies are their possible delegations. We answer several questions on the equilibria of this process in any social network or in social networks that correspond to restricted types of graphs. We show that a Nash-equilibrium may not exist, and that it is even NP-complete to decide whether one exists or not. This holds even if the social network is a complete graph or a bounded degree graph. We further show that this existence problem is W[1]-hard w.r.t. the treewidth of the social network. Besides these hardness results, we demonstrate that an equilibrium always exists whatever the preferences of the voters iff the social network is a tree. We design a dynamic programming procedure to determine some desirable equilibria (e.g., minimizing the dissatisfaction of the voters) in polynomial time for tree social networks. Lastly, we study the convergence of delegation dynamics. Unfortunately, when an equilibrium exists, we show that a best response dynamics may not converge, even if the social network is a path or a complete graph.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2018

Optimizing a Generalized Gini Index in Stable Marriage Problems: NP-Hardness, Approximation and a Polynomial Time Special Case

This paper deals with fairness in stable marriage problems. The idea studied here is to achieve fairness thanks to a Generalized Gini Index (GGI), a well-known criterion in inequality measurement, that includes both the egalitarian and utilitarian criteria as special cases. We show that determining a stable marriage optimizing a GGI criterion of agents' disutilities is an NP-hard problem. We then provide a polynomial time 2-approximation algorithm in the general case, as well as an exact algorithm which is polynomial time in the case of a constant number of non-zero weights parametrizing the GGI criterion.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2018

Iterative Delegations in Liquid Democracy with Restricted Preferences

In this paper, we study liquid democracy, a collective decision making paradigm which lies between direct and representative democracy. One main feature of liquid democracy is that voters can delegate their votes in a transitive manner so that: A delegates to B and B delegates to C leads to A delegates to C. Unfortunately, this process may not converge as there may not even exist a stable state (also called equilibrium). In this paper, we investigate the stability of the delegation process in liquid democracy when voters have restricted types of preference on the agent representing them (e.g., single-peaked preferences). We show that various natural structures of preferences guarantee the existence of an equilibrium and we obtain both tractability and hardness results for the problem of computing several equilibria with some desirable properties.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2016

Optimizing Quantiles in Preference-based Markov Decision Processes

In the Markov decision process model, policies are usually evaluated by expected cumulative rewards. As this decision criterion is not always suitable, we propose in this paper an algorithm for computing a policy optimal for the quantile criterion. Both finite and infinite horizons are considered. Finally we experimentally evaluate our approach on random MDPs and on a data center control problem.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2016

Quantile Reinforcement Learning

In reinforcement learning, the standard criterion to evaluate policies in a state is the expectation of (discounted) sum of rewards. However, this criterion may not always be suitable, we consider an alternative criterion based on the notion of quantiles. In the case of episodic reinforcement learning problems, we propose an algorithm based on stochastic approximation with two timescales. We evaluate our proposition on a simple model of the TV show, Who wants to be a millionaire.

cs.LG↗