arXiv subjects

Hugo Aaronson

Publications and source records attributed to Hugo Aaronson.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Pseudo-deterministic Quantum Algorithms

We initiate a systematic study of pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms. These are quantum algorithms that, for any input, output a canonical solution with high probability. Focusing on the query complexity model, our main contributions include the following complexity separations, which require new lower bound techniques specifically tailored to pseudo-determinism: - We exhibit a problem, Avoid One Encrypted String (AOES), whose classical randomized query complexity is $O(1)$ but is maximally hard for pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms ($\Omega(N)$ query complexity). - We exhibit a problem, Quantum-Locked Estimation (QL-Estimation), for which pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms admit an exponential speed-up over classical pseudo-deterministic algorithms ($O(\log(N))$ vs. $\Theta(\sqrt{N})$), while the randomized query complexity is $O(1)$. Complementing these separations, we show that for any total problem $R$, pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms admit at most a quintic advantage over deterministic algorithms, i.e., $D(R) = \tilde O(psQ(R)^5)$. On the algorithmic side, we identify a class of quantum search problems that can be made pseudo-deterministic with small overhead, including Grover search, element distinctness, triangle finding, $k$-sum, and graph collision.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

Property Testing in Bounded Degree Hypergraphs

We extend the bounded degree graph model for property testing introduced by Goldreich and Ron (Algorithmica, 2002) to hypergraphs. In this framework, we analyse the query complexity of three fundamental hypergraph properties: colorability, $k$-partiteness, and independence number. We present a randomized algorithm for testing $k$-partiteness within families of $k$-uniform $n$-vertex hypergraphs of bounded treewidth whose query complexity does not depend on $n$. In addition, we prove optimal lower bounds of $\Omega(n)$ on the query complexity of testing algorithms for $k$-colorability, $k$-partiteness, and independence number in $k$-uniform $n$-vertex hypergraphs of bounded degree. For each of these properties, we consider the problem of explicitly constructing $k$-uniform hypergraphs of bounded degree that differ in $\Theta(n)$ hyperedges from any hypergraph satisfying the property, but where violations of the latter cannot be detected in any neighborhood of $o(n)$ vertices.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Quantum Channel Testing in Average-Case Distance

We study the complexity of testing properties of quantum channels. First, we show that testing identity to any channel $\mathcal N: \mathbb C^{d_{\mathrm{in}} \times d_{\mathrm{in}}} \to \mathbb C^{d_{\mathrm{out}} \times d_{\mathrm{out}}}$ in diamond norm distance requires $\Omega(\sqrt{d_{\mathrm{in}}} / \varepsilon)$ queries, even in the strongest algorithmic model that admits ancillae, coherence, and adaptivity. This is due to the worst-case nature of the distance induced by the diamond norm. Motivated by this limitation and other theoretical and practical applications, we introduce an average-case analogue of the diamond norm, which we call the average-case imitation diamond (ACID) norm. In the weakest algorithmic model without ancillae, coherence, or adaptivity, we prove that testing identity to certain types of channels in ACID distance can be done with complexity independent of the dimensions of the channel, while for other types of channels the complexity depends on both the input and output dimensions. Building on previous work, we also show that identity to any fixed channel can be tested with $\tilde O(d_{\mathrm{in}} d_{\mathrm{out}}^{3/2} / \varepsilon^2)$ queries in ACID distance and $\tilde O(d_{\mathrm{in}}^2 d_{\mathrm{out}}^{3/2} / \varepsilon^2)$ queries in diamond distance in this model. Finally, we prove tight bounds on the complexity of channel tomography in ACID distance.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

Distribution-Free Proofs of Proximity

Motivated by the fact that input distributions are often unknown in advance, distribution-free property testing considers a setting where the algorithmic task is to accept functions $f : [n] \to \{0,1\}$ with a certain property P and reject functions that are $\eta$-far from P, where the distance is measured according to an arbitrary and unknown input distribution $D \sim [n]$. As usual in property testing, the tester can only make a sublinear number of input queries, but as the distribution is unknown, we also allow a sublinear number of samples from the distribution D. In this work we initiate the study of distribution-free interactive proofs of proximity (df-IPPs) in which the distribution-free testing algorithm is assisted by an all powerful but untrusted prover. Our main result is that for any problem P $\in$ NC, any proximity parameter $\eta > 0$, and any (trade-off) parameter $t\leq\sqrt{n}$, we construct a df-IPP for P with respect to $\eta$, that has query and sample complexities $t+O(1/\eta)$, and communication complexity $\tilde{O}(n/t + 1/\eta)$. For t as above and sufficiently large $\eta$ (namely, when $\eta > t/n$), this result matches the parameters of the best-known general purpose IPPs in the standard uniform setting. Moreover, for such t, its parameters are optimal up to poly-logarithmic factors under reasonable cryptographic assumptions for the same regime of $\eta$ as the uniform setting, i.e., when $\eta \geq 1/t$. For small $\eta$ (i.e., $\eta< t/n$), our protocol has communication complexity $\Omega(1/\eta)$, which is worse than the $\tilde{O}(n/t)$ communication complexity of the uniform IPPs (with the same query complexity). To improve on this gap, we show that for IPPs over specialised, but large distribution families, such as sufficiently smooth distributions and product distributions, the communication complexity reduces to $\tilde{O}(n/t^{1-o(1)})$.

cs.CC↗