arXiv subjects

Hsiang-Chen Yeh

Publications and source records attributed to Hsiang-Chen Yeh.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Word-Aligned Prosody Reflects Speaker Differences More Than Depression or PTSD Severity

Word-aligned prosody is increasingly used to detect depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), yet the stability and clinical relevance of these measurements remain unclear. We examine stability at two levels. At the word level, we ask whether a speaker produces the same word in a similar speaker-specific way across different utterance contexts. At the speaker level, we ask whether averaging prosody across many words produces consistent speaker scores across separate recordings. Drawing on principles of psychological measurement, we compare these representations in four corpora spanning acted, spontaneous, and clinical speech. Word-specific deviations show little cross-context recurrence (0.01-0.16), whereas speaker summaries are highly consistent, reaching 0.997 in ESD, 0.73-0.90 in MSP-Podcast, and 0.84-0.996 in DAIC-WOZ and PTSD-STOP. Despite this consistency, associations with depression or PTSD severity do not exceed 0.15; equivalence tests exclude effects of 0.30 in all analyses and 0.20 in DAIC-WOZ, while within-person associations with daily PTSD symptoms are near zero ($|ρ|\leq0.04$). Thus, aggregation yields stable speaker-level prosodic measures, but these measures do not detectably track depression or PTSD severity in the studied corpora. Code is available at https://github.com/jen900704/word-aligned-prosody.

eess.AS↗

arXiv2026

Disentangling the Interpretive and Predictive Roles of LIWC: Controlled Substitution in Depression-Related Classification

Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) provides auditable psycholinguistic categories that are widely used to interpret depression-related language, but its incremental predictive role in modern multimodal systems remains unclear. We evaluate LIWC across five English and Chinese depression-related corpora under matched participant-level cross-validation. We ask whether LIWC improves classification and what any performance change reflects. Intact LIWC is compared with three fold-local substitutes: a PCA-rotated version that removes direct access to named category coordinates, a participant-shuffled version that preserves real LIWC profiles while breaking participant alignment, and a random-marginal version that preserves feature-wise distributions. Across multiple fixed representation contexts, the results provide limited evidence for stable LIWC gains under frozen, participant-level early fusion. None of the prespecified dataset-blocked contrasts survives multiple-comparison correction. A separate SBERT calibration produces larger observed intact-versus-shuffled and intact-versus-random separations, indicating that larger participant-aligned signals can produce correspondingly larger separations under the same procedure, while not resolving the five-corpus power limitation. LIWC remains useful as an auditable, corpus-conditioned interpretive layer. These conclusions should not be generalized to fine-tuned, sequence-aware, or end-to-end architectures.

eess.AS↗

arXiv2026

Who is Speaking or Who is Depressed? A Controlled Study of Speaker Leakage in Speech-Based Depression Detection

This study investigates whether speech-based depression detection models learn depression-related acoustic biomarkers or instead rely on speaker identity cues. Using the DAIC-WOZ dataset, we propose a data-splitting strategy that controls speaker overlap between training and test sets while keeping the training size constant, and evaluate three models of varying complexity. Results show that speaker overlap significantly boosts performance, whereas accuracy drops sharply on unseen speakers. Even with a Domain-Adversarial Neural Network, a substantial performance gap remains. These findings indicate that depression-related features extracted by current speech models are highly entangled with speaker identity. Conventional evaluation protocols may therefore overestimate generalization and clinical utility, highlighting the need for strictly speaker-independent evaluation.

eess.AS↗