arXiv subjects

Hossein Mohasel Arjomandi

Publications and source records attributed to Hossein Mohasel Arjomandi.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Building Weighted PubMed Citation Graphs at Scale: A Pipeline and an Audit of Edge-Similarity Features

Studies of scientific literature often combine citation links with article metadata, but the data preparation needed to do so at the scale of millions of papers is laborious and error-prone. This paper describes a pipeline that turns PubMed metadata and a citation network into a graph whose edges carry seven similarity features: bibliographic coupling and co-citation (each as a count and as a Jaccard coefficient), publication-year proximity, MeSH-term similarity, and similarity of MedCPT title-abstract embeddings. Applied to a citation network derived from the cell biology research literature, the pipeline yields 7,445,898 nodes and 57,512,086 edges with complete year, MeSH, title, and abstract metadata. The paper reports how nodes are matched across sources, how duplicate identifiers are resolved, and which intermediate tables grew to hundreds of gigabytes. An audit of the full feature table shows that 47.2% of the edges share neither references nor citing documents, so their topological features are zero, and that the MeSH feature is nonzero on only 0.28% of edges. Where both kinds of signal exist, they agree: edges with higher coupling also have more similar abstracts and closer publication years. In a pilot, replacing the median by a mean or best-match aggregation makes the MeSH feature nonzero on nearly all article pairs, and near-identical texts point to possible duplicate records that identifier checks miss. The parsing, graph-construction, and feature code are public; the paper states which data are released and which are not. A companion paper uses the resulting weighted graph for clustering.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2026

Similarity-Weighted Leiden-CPM Clustering of a 7.4-Million-Node Biomedical Citation Graph: Weight Alignment, Scale, and Sparsity

Clustering citation networks into research communities supports science mapping, research evaluation, and the analysis of funding portfolios. Biomedical articles also carry metadata, such as MeSH terms, publication year, and abstracts, that can be turned into similarity-based edge weights for Leiden clustering under the Constant Potts Model (CPM). Studies of hybrid relatedness compare the accuracy of such clusterings, but how the weights interact with the CPM resolution parameter on a large graph is less clear. Here it is shown that, on a citation network derived from the cell biology research literature (7.4 million nodes, 57.5 million edges), the effect of the weights is governed mainly by their scale and by edges of weight zero, and that, once these are controlled, weighting gives modestly more coherent clusters. Edges were weighted with seven topological and semantic similarity features and clustered with Leiden-CPM, using a method updated to fix a bug in how earlier code attached weights to edges. Mean weights of 0.0015 to 0.23 raised the effective resolution 4- to 650-fold; dividing by the mean restored most of the coverage, except for topological weightings, in which the 47% of edges with weight zero hold most of it. At equal coverage, weighted clusters were more coherent than unweighted ones, also on features outside the weight. For weighted CPM clustering, weights should therefore be attached to edges by key, normalized or reported with their effective resolution, and checked for zero-weight edges.

cs.SI↗