Henrik Wüstenberg | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Low-Order Refined Preconditioning for Spectral/hp Element Method for Complex, 3D Geometries

Low-order refined (LOR) preconditioning replaces a high-order operator with a low-order discretisation on a refined nodal mesh. For tensor-product elements, the two operators are spectrally equivalent with bounds independent of the polynomial order $P$, but the construction does not extend directly to simplex and mixed-element discretisations. This work makes two contributions: it extends LOR preconditioning to simplex and mixed-element discretisations, including triangular, tetrahedral, and prismatic elements, and establishes a generalised Vandermonde transformation linking the modal and nodal LOR formulations, showing that the resulting preconditioned spectra and Krylov convergence are independent of the high-order basis. Numerical experiments show controlled iteration growth on triangular meshes despite increasing condition number, and controlled iteration counts up to $P=6$ on tetrahedral, prismatic, and mixed-element meshes. A single algebraic multigrid V-cycle per outer iteration gives the best balance of iteration count and cost. The method is applied to a production incompressible Navier-Stokes simulation of a race-car front-wing and wheel configuration, discretised on a mesh of $2.87\times10^6$ mixed prismatic and tetrahedral elements giving $32.2\times10^6$ pressure degrees of freedom at $P=3$. LOR reduces the mean pressure conjugate gradient (CG) iteration count from $235.3$ to $5.5$, and the pressure-solve time over 1000 timesteps by 16.1%, relative to the default production static-condensation diagonal preconditioner in Nektar++. The one-time cost of constructing the LOR preconditioner is amortised over the production simulation.

math.NA↗

arXiv2026

Implicit Velocity Correction Schemes for Scale-Resolving Simulations of Incompressible Flow: Stability, Accuracy, and Performance

Scale-resolving simulations of high Reynolds number incompressible flows are often limited by the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) stability restriction imposed by explicit time-stepping schemes, resulting in small time step sizes and long time-to-solution. In this work, we systematically compare two implicit formulations of the velocity correction scheme -- a linear-implicit approach and a sub-stepping (or semi-Lagrangian) method -- against a standard semi-implicit formulation within a high-order spectral/hp element framework. The schemes are assessed in terms of stability limits, temporal accuracy, and computational performance for implicit large-eddy simulation of the Imperial Front Wing benchmark, a complex high Reynolds number geometry with curved surfaces that imposes strict CFL constraints. Both implicit schemes extend the stability limit by up to two orders of magnitude in time step size. While increasing the cost per time step, they reduce the overall time-to-solution by up to a factor of eleven. Accuracy analysis shows that time step sizes up to twenty times larger than the explicit limit have only minor impact on resolving laminar-turbulent transition and key flow statistics. The results quantify the trade-off between stability, accuracy, and computational cost for implicit velocity correction schemes on complex geometries and provide guidance for selecting time integration strategies in large-scale scale-resolving simulations.

physics.flu-dyn↗