arXiv subjects

Hayretdin Bahsi

Publications and source records attributed to Hayretdin Bahsi.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Offline-Verifiable Accountability for Cross-Organization Agent Messaging: A Preserved Evidence-Bundle Approach

Cross-organization agent workflows require preserved evidence that remains independently verifiable during later audit or dispute review. They may involve multiple organizations, delegated actions, policy-relevant events, and disputed accountability claims. This is difficult when live systems are unavailable, controlled by one party, or not trusted by all participants. Existing mechanisms provide useful pieces, including authenticated logging, delegation semantics, signed checkpoints, and consistency checks. What remains missing is a verifier-centered event-level bundle for checking evidence sufficiency offline under an explicit policy. We propose a preserved evidence-bundle model and a policy-controlled offline verifier for agent-to-agent workflow events. Each bundle preserves policy-required evidence, including sender authentication, authenticated log commitment, witness-backed checkpoint evidence, append-only continuity, delegation-aware authorization evidence, and explicit receiver-signed receipt evidence when required. The verifier accepts only claims supported by the selected policy-required evidence, giving a later reviewer an offline basis for assessing evidence sufficiency. It does not infer delivery or receipt from transport behavior or log inclusion alone. In a prototype evaluation over 300 complete workflows and 1200 valid preserved bundles, we measure offline verifier-side latency across policy profiles and workflow-event evidence requirements. Checkpoint-context anchoring has the highest latency in the current prototype, while delegation and workflow-prerequisite evidence require additional verification steps. In targeted negative-evidence tests, all corrupted or policy-insufficient bundles were rejected, with no false acceptance observed. These results support evidence-based audit and dispute review without relying on live services or platform-specific logs.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

When Prompts Control Robots: Prompt Injection Attacks in Multi-Agent Robotic Systems

Large language models are increasingly integrated into autonomous robotic systems for task planning and control, but this integration exposes them to prompt injection attacks that can lead to unsafe decisions and physical harm. Multi-agent settings increase the risks through cross-agent contamination and broader attack surfaces. In this paper, we evaluate prompt injection attacks against an LLM-based multi-agent robotic system, considering both direct injections into task instructions and indirect injections through perception modules. In our experiments across varying attack-goal complexities and injection strategies in both single-agent and multi-agent settings, we show that prompt injection can induce adversarial actions while reducing task completion. We find that attacks can propagate from one agent to others through shared prompt structures, with impacts varying depending on prompt composition and the targeted agent. We further analyze how architectural changes affect LLM queries and, consequently, the attack success. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that systematically investigates prompt injection attacks in a multi-agent LLM-based robotic system.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

From Prompt to Physical Actuation: Holistic Threat Modeling of LLM-Enabled Robotic Systems

As large language models are integrated into autonomous robotic systems for task planning and control, compromised inputs or unsafe model outputs can propagate through the planning pipeline to physical-world consequences. Although prior work has studied robotic cybersecurity, adversarial perception attacks, and LLM safety independently, no existing study traces how these threat categories interact and propagate across trust boundaries in a unified architectural model. We address this gap by modeling an LLM-enabled autonomous robot in an edge-cloud architecture as a hierarchical Data Flow Diagram and applying STRIDE-per-interaction analysis across six boundary-crossing interaction points using a three-category taxonomy of Conventional Cyber Threats, Adversarial Threats, and Conversational Threats. The analysis reveals that these categories converge at the same boundary crossings, and we trace three cross-boundary attack chains from external entry points to unsafe physical actuation, each exposing a distinct architectural property: the absence of independent semantic validation between user input and actuator dispatch, cross-modal translation from visual perception to language-model instruction, and unmediated boundary crossing through provider-side tool use. To our knowledge, this is the first DFD-based threat analysis integrating all three threat categories across the full perception-planning-actuation pipeline of an LLM-enabled robotic system.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Incremental Federated Learning for Intrusion Detection in IoT Networks under Evolving Threat Landscape

The expansion of Internet of Things (IoT) devices has increased the attack surface of networks, necessitating a robust and adaptive intrusion detection systems. Machine learning based systems have been considered promising in enhancing the detection performance. Federated learning settings enabled us to train models from network intrusion data collected from clients in a privacy preserving manner. However, the effectiveness of these systems can degrade over time due to concept drift, where patterns in data evolve as attackers develop new techniques. Realistic detection models should be non-stationary, so they can be continuously updated with new intrusion data while maintaining their detection capability for older data. As IoT environments are resource constrained, updates should consume minimal computational resources. This study provides a comprehensive performance analysis of incremental federated learning in enhancing the long term performance of non stationary IDS models in IoT networks. Specifically, we propose LSTM models within a federated learning setting to evaluate incremental learning approaches that utilize data and model-based measures against catastrophic learning under drift conditions. Using the CICIoMT2024 dataset, which includes various attack variants across five major categories, we conduct both binary and multiclass classification to provide a granular analysis of the intrusion detection task. Our results show that cumulative incremental learning and representative learning provide the most stable performance under drift, while retention-based methods offer a strong accuracy and latency trade off. The study offers new insights into the interplay between training strategy performance and latency in dynamic IoT environments, aiming to inform the development of more resilient IDS solutions considering the resource constraints in IoT devices.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Where Do LLM-based Systems Break? A System-Level Security Framework for Risk Assessment and Treatment

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into safety-critical workflows, yet existing security analyses remain fragmented and often isolate model behavior from the broader system context. This work introduces a goal-driven risk assessment framework for LLM-powered systems that combines system modeling with Attack-Defense Trees (ADTrees) and Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS)-based exploitability scoring to support structured, comparable analysis. We demonstrate the framework through a healthcare case study, modeling multi-step attack paths targeting intervention in medical procedures, leakage of electronic health record (EHR) data, and disruption of service availability. Our analysis indicates that threats spanning (i) conventional cyber, (ii) adversarial ML, and (iii) conversational attacks that manipulate prompts or context often consolidate into a small number of dominant paths and shared system choke points, enabling targeted defenses to yield meaningful reductions in path exploitability. By systematically comparing defense portfolios, we align these risks with established vulnerability management practices and provide a domain-agnostic workflow applicable to other LLM-enabled critical systems.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Goal-Driven Risk Assessment for LLM-Powered Systems: A Healthcare Case Study

While incorporating LLMs into systems offers significant benefits in critical application areas such as healthcare, new security challenges emerge due to the potential cyber kill chain cycles that combine adversarial model, prompt injection and conventional cyber attacks. Threat modeling methods enable the system designers to identify potential cyber threats and the relevant mitigations during the early stages of development. Although the cyber security community has extensive experience in applying these methods to software-based systems, the elicited threats are usually abstract and vague, limiting their effectiveness for conducting proper likelihood and impact assessments for risk prioritization, especially in complex systems with novel attacks surfaces, such as those involving LLMs. In this study, we propose a structured, goal driven risk assessment approach that contextualizes the threats with detailed attack vectors, preconditions, and attack paths through the use of attack trees. We demonstrate the proposed approach on a case study with an LLM agent-based healthcare system. This study harmonizes the state-of-the-art attacks to LLMs with conventional ones and presents possible attack paths applicable to similar systems. By providing a structured risk assessment, this study makes a significant contribution to the literature and advances the secure-by-design practices in LLM-based systems.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Enhancing Continual Learning for Software Vulnerability Prediction: Addressing Catastrophic Forgetting via Hybrid-Confidence-Aware Selective Replay for Temporal LLM Fine-Tuning

Recent work applies Large Language Models (LLMs) to source-code vulnerability detection, but most evaluations still rely on random train-test splits that ignore time and overestimate real-world performance. In practice, detectors are deployed on evolving code bases and must recognise future vulnerabilities under temporal distribution shift. This paper investigates continual fine-tuning of a decoder-style language model (microsoft/phi-2 with LoRA) on a CVE-linked dataset spanning 2018-2024, organised into bi-monthly windows. We evaluate eight continual learning strategies, including window-only and cumulative training, replay-based baselines and regularisation-based variants. We propose Hybrid Class-Aware Selective Replay (Hybrid-CASR), a confidence-aware replay method for binary vulnerability classification that prioritises uncertain samples while maintaining a balanced ratio of VULNERABLE and FIXED functions in the replay buffer. On bi-monthly forward evaluation Hybrid-CASR achieves a Macro-F1 of 0.667, improving on the window-only baseline (0.651) by 0.016 with statistically significant gains ($p = 0.026$) and stronger backward retention (IBR@1 of 0.741). Hybrid-CASR also reduces training time per window by about 17 percent compared to the baseline, whereas cumulative training delivers only a minor F1 increase (0.661) at a 15.9-fold computational cost. Overall, the results show that selective replay with class balancing offers a practical accuracy-efficiency trade-off for LLM-based temporal vulnerability detection under continuous temporal drift.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

Enhancing Security in LLM Applications: A Performance Evaluation of Early Detection Systems

Prompt injection threatens novel applications that emerge from adapting LLMs for various user tasks. The newly developed LLM-based software applications become more ubiquitous and diverse. However, the threat of prompt injection attacks undermines the security of these systems as the mitigation and defenses against them, proposed so far, are insufficient. We investigated the capabilities of early prompt injection detection systems, focusing specifically on the detection performance of techniques implemented in various open-source solutions. These solutions are supposed to detect certain types of prompt injection attacks, including the prompt leak. In prompt leakage attacks, an attacker maliciously manipulates the LLM into outputting its system instructions, violating the system's confidentiality. Our study presents analyzes of distinct prompt leakage detection techniques, and a comparative analysis of several detection solutions, which implement those techniques. We identify the strengths and weaknesses of these techniques and elaborate on their optimal configuration and usage in high-stake deployments. In one of the first studies on existing prompt leak detection solutions, we compared the performances of LLM Guard, Vigil, and Rebuff. We concluded that the implementations of canary word checks in Vigil and Rebuff were not effective at detecting prompt leak attacks, and we proposed improvements for them. We also found an evasion weakness in Rebuff's secondary model-based technique and proposed a mitigation. Then, the result of the comparison of LLM Guard, Vigil, and Rebuff at their peak performance revealed that Vigil is optimal for cases when minimal false positive rate is required, and Rebuff is the most optimal for average needs.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

Evaluating explainable AI for deep learning-based network intrusion detection system alert classification

A Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) monitors networks for cyber attacks and other unwanted activities. However, NIDS solutions often generate an overwhelming number of alerts daily, making it challenging for analysts to prioritize high-priority threats. While deep learning models promise to automate the prioritization of NIDS alerts, the lack of transparency in these models can undermine trust in their decision-making. This study highlights the critical need for explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in NIDS alert classification to improve trust and interpretability. We employed a real-world NIDS alert dataset from Security Operations Center (SOC) of TalTech (Tallinn University Of Technology) in Estonia, developing a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model to prioritize alerts. To explain the LSTM model's alert prioritization decisions, we implemented and compared four XAI methods: Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME), SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Integrated Gradients, and DeepLIFT. The quality of these XAI methods was assessed using a comprehensive framework that evaluated faithfulness, complexity, robustness, and reliability. Our results demonstrate that DeepLIFT consistently outperformed the other XAI methods, providing explanations with high faithfulness, low complexity, robust performance, and strong reliability. In collaboration with SOC analysts, we identified key features essential for effective alert classification. The strong alignment between these analyst-identified features and those obtained by the XAI methods validates their effectiveness and enhances the practical applicability of our approach.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

To Protect the LLM Agent Against the Prompt Injection Attack with Polymorphic Prompt

LLM agents are widely used as agents for customer support, content generation, and code assistance. However, they are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, where adversarial inputs manipulate the model's behavior. Traditional defenses like input sanitization, guard models, and guardrails are either cumbersome or ineffective. In this paper, we propose a novel, lightweight defense mechanism called Polymorphic Prompt Assembling (PPA), which protects against prompt injection with near-zero overhead. The approach is based on the insight that prompt injection requires guessing and breaking the structure of the system prompt. By dynamically varying the structure of system prompts, PPA prevents attackers from predicting the prompt structure, thereby enhancing security without compromising performance. We conducted experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of PPA against existing attacks and compared it with other defense methods.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

A Systematic Literature Review of Cyber Security Monitoring in Maritime

In recent years, many cyber incidents have occurred in the maritime sector, targeting the information technology (IT) and operational technology (OT) infrastructure. One of the key approaches for handling cyber incidents is cyber security monitoring, which aims at timely detection of cyber attacks with automated methods. Although several literature review papers have been published in the field of maritime cyber security, none of the previous studies has focused on cyber security monitoring. The current paper addresses this research gap and surveys the methods, algorithms, tools and architectures used for cyber security monitoring in the maritime sector. For the survey, a systematic literature review of cyber security monitoring studies is conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. The first contribution of this paper is the bibliometric analysis of related literature and the identification of the main research themes in previous works. For that purpose, the paper presents a taxonomy for existing studies which highlights the main properties of maritime cyber security monitoring research. The second contribution of this paper is an in-depth analysis of previous works and the identification of research gaps and limitations in existing literature. The gaps and limitations include several dataset and evaluation issues and a number of understudied research topics. Based on these findings, the paper outlines future research directions for cyber security monitoring in the maritime field.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2024

Using Large Language Models for Template Detection from Security Event Logs

In modern IT systems and computer networks, real-time and offline event log analysis is a crucial part of cyber security monitoring. In particular, event log analysis techniques are essential for the timely detection of cyber attacks and for assisting security experts with the analysis of past security incidents. The detection of line patterns or templates from unstructured textual event logs has been identified as an important task of event log analysis since detected templates represent event types in the event log and prepare the logs for downstream online or offline security monitoring tasks. During the last two decades, a number of template mining algorithms have been proposed. However, many proposed algorithms rely on traditional data mining techniques, and the usage of Large Language Models (LLMs) has received less attention so far. Also, most approaches that harness LLMs are supervised, and unsupervised LLM-based template mining remains an understudied area. The current paper addresses this research gap and investigates the application of LLMs for unsupervised detection of templates from unstructured security event logs.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2024

Harnessing Large Language Models for Software Vulnerability Detection: A Comprehensive Benchmarking Study

Despite various approaches being employed to detect vulnerabilities, the number of reported vulnerabilities shows an upward trend over the years. This suggests the problems are not caught before the code is released, which could be caused by many factors, like lack of awareness, limited efficacy of the existing vulnerability detection tools or the tools not being user-friendly. To help combat some issues with traditional vulnerability detection tools, we propose using large language models (LLMs) to assist in finding vulnerabilities in source code. LLMs have shown a remarkable ability to understand and generate code, underlining their potential in code-related tasks. The aim is to test multiple state-of-the-art LLMs and identify the best prompting strategies, allowing extraction of the best value from the LLMs. We provide an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the LLM-based approach and compare the results to those of traditional static analysis tools. We find that LLMs can pinpoint many more issues than traditional static analysis tools, outperforming traditional tools in terms of recall and F1 scores. The results should benefit software developers and security analysts responsible for ensuring that the code is free of vulnerabilities.

cs.CR↗