Duality, rigidity, and peeling for multisegments: on hypotheses of Mitra, Offen, and Sayag
Mitra, Offen, and Sayag introduced distinguished multisegments and multisegments of Speh type, and proposed that every distinguished multisegment is of Speh type, together with a related duality hypothesis (see A. Mitra, O. Offen, and E. Sayag, Klyachko Models for Ladder Representations, Documenta Math. 22 (2017), 611-657). They proved these statements for sets of segments and when at most two segments share an endpoint. We develop a combinatorial theory of relevant decompositions and prove that relevance is preserved under the involution $Δ\mapstoΔ^\vee$ together with reversal of standard order. Hence, $\mathfrak m$ is distinguished if and only if $\mathfrak m^\vee$ is distinguished, so the two hypotheses are equivalent. We define $S_{\mathfrak m}(Δ)=\sum_{t\ge0}(-1)^t\mathfrak m(ν^tΔ)$ and show that $\mathfrak m$ is of Speh type if and only if $S_{\mathfrak m}(Δ)\ge0$ for every segment $Δ$. Using rigidity properties, we obtain a peeling theorem and a numerical tameness condition, and prove both hypotheses for every tame multisegment, extending the previously known classes. Finally, we construct a five-segment multisegment that is not distinguished, although every standard order with non-increasing endpoints admits a non-trivial relevant decomposition. Thus, endpoint-ordered witnesses alone cannot prove the hypothesis in general. The remaining case reduces to multisegments for which both $\mathfrak m$ and $\mathfrak m^\vee$ are non-tame.