arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Haobo Sun

Publications and source records attributed to Haobo Sun.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

RTP-LLM: Building an Evolvable and Reliable LLM Inference Engine at Alibaba Scale

Large language models and inference techniques evolve rapidly, making model enablement a recurring production task rather than a one-time integration effort. At Alibaba, a shared inference infrastructure must keep pace with new models and serving capabilities while remaining reliable across heterogeneous production environments. To reconcile rapid evolution with production reliability, we present RTP-LLM, an open-source production inference engine developed and deployed at Alibaba. Its architecture separates model-specific execution from shared request processing, state management, and resource coordination. Explicit interfaces localize compatible model changes while allowing models and deployment configurations to reuse common serving mechanisms. RTP-LLM has evolved from an exploratory system into a shared production engine that supports $\sim$100 models and processes hundreds of trillions of tokens per day. We describe how its architecture and production practices accommodate model evolution and contain the impact of failures, and share lessons for building evolvable and reliable inference engines at enterprise scale.

cs.OS↗

Legal Evalutions and Challenges of Large Language Models

In this paper, we review legal testing methods based on Large Language Models (LLMs), using the OPENAI o1 model as a case study to evaluate the performance of large models in applying legal provisions. We compare current state-of-the-art LLMs, including open-source, closed-source, and legal-specific models trained specifically for the legal domain. Systematic tests are conducted on English and Chinese legal cases, and the results are analyzed in depth. Through systematic testing of legal cases from common law systems and China, this paper explores the strengths and weaknesses of LLMs in understanding and applying legal texts, reasoning through legal issues, and predicting judgments. The experimental results highlight both the potential and limitations of LLMs in legal applications, particularly in terms of challenges related to the interpretation of legal language and the accuracy of legal reasoning. Finally, the paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of various types of models, offering valuable insights and references for the future application of AI in the legal field.

cs.CL↗